Powershell "-eq" operator and "False"

1337

You can test how if-then statement works directly in powershell. Just type/copy it in straight on the command line,

For example:

if ($false) { "True" } else { "False" }
if ("False") { "True" } else { "False" }
if ($true) { "True" } else { "False" }
if ("True") { "True" } else { "False" }
if ("") { "True" } else { "False" }
if (0) { "True" } else { "False" }
if (1) { "True" } else { "False" }

You can also do the same test by forcing powershell to convert whatever you want into a boolean. And telling you if something is true or false.

For example:

[bool]$false
[bool]"False"

This is called type casting. But that belongs to more advanced programming concepts.

pmoncho

@Danp said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

if ($UserE.enabled -eq "False") {

Try if ($UserE.enabled -eq $False) {

if ($UserE.enabled -ne "True") {...

This works, but not in the way you think. It would likely give the incorrect result when enabled is $True.

This worked. Greatly appreciate it.

pmoncho

@Pete-S said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

@pmoncho

You can test how if-then statement works directly in powershell. Just type/copy it in straight on the command line,

For example:

if ($false) { "True" } else { "False" }

if ("False") { "True" } else { "False" }

if ($true) { "True" } else { "False" }

if ("True") { "True" } else { "False" }

if ("") { "True" } else { "False" }

if (0) { "True" } else { "False" }

if (1) { "True" } else { "False" }

You can also do the same test by forcing powershell to convert whatever you want into a boolean. And telling you if something is true or false.

For example:

[bool]$false

[bool]"False"

This is called type casting. But that belongs to more advanced programming concepts.

Thanks for the excellent explanation. Now I just have to try an remember this.

1337

@pmoncho said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

Thanks for the excellent explanation. Now I just have to try an remember this.

Yes, there is always that.

Well, you can take comfort in the fact that all programming languages works about the same in this regard. So the knowledge is not wasted just on powershell.

If you get down to what the CPU is actually doing, all if-then-else statements boils down to a comparison with zero that decides what code to execute.

So the reason why false and true is really represented by zero and non-zero has a deeply technical reason.

Obsolesce

@pmoncho said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

Trying to figure out why this will not work? I'm stumped
$UserID = read-host "UserID to disable"
$UserE = (Get-ADUser $UserID)

write-host "Account Enabled?" $UserE.Enabled

if ($UserE.enabled -eq "False") {
   $a = read-host "Move to Disabled Accounts OU? (Y/N)"
   $answer
}
UserID to disable: test1
Account Enabled? False

C:\windows\system32

If I use the following all is works whether "Enabled" is True or False
if ($UserE.enabled -ne "True") {...

In PowerShell, typically if it's in double quotes, it's a string. That's what you were were checking for, is if a given string equals the word "False".... instead of the boolean true/false, as $true/$false.

To find out what type of output you're dealing with, you can always use the built-in getType() method. You'll notice the Name property of String or Boolean.

pmoncho

@Obsolesce said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

@pmoncho said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":
Trying to figure out why this will not work? I'm stumped
$UserID = read-host "UserID to disable"
$UserE = (Get-ADUser $UserID)

write-host "Account Enabled?" $UserE.Enabled

if ($UserE.enabled -eq "False") {
   $a = read-host "Move to Disabled Accounts OU? (Y/N)"
   $answer
}
UserID to disable: test1
Account Enabled? False

C:\windows\system32

If I use the following all is works whether "Enabled" is True or False
if ($UserE.enabled -ne "True") {...
In PowerShell, typically if it's in double quotes, it's a string. That's what you were were checking for, is if a given string equals the word "False".... instead of the boolean true/false, as $true/$false.

To find out what type of output you're dealing with, you can always use the built-in getType() method. You'll notice the Name property of String or Boolean.

Thanks, as this will be VERY helpful because it was a question burning in the back of my head.

1337

@pmoncho said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

@Obsolesce said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

In PowerShell, typically if it's in double quotes, it's a string. That's what you were were checking for, is if a given string equals the word "False".... instead of the boolean true/false, as $true/$false.

To find out what type of output you're dealing with, you can always use the built-in getType() method. You'll notice the Name property of String or Boolean.

Thanks, as this will be VERY helpful because it was a question burning in the back of my head.

Have a look at the difference between strings in double quotes and single quotes as well.

Best practice is to encapsulate strings in single quotes everywhere and use double quotes only when needed.

The difference is that double quoted strings are evaluated and not static. That's good when you want it but can cause unexpected behavior when you don't.

For example:

PS> $i=1

PS> echo '$i is a string' 
$i is a string

PS> echo "$i is a string"
1 is a string

Obsolesce

@Pete-S said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

Have a look at the difference between strings in double quotes and single quotes as well.

Yes this is a case where one point can lead to another and before you know it, it's a book.

His original post had nothing to do with single quotes so I wanted to watch how far I took it. That's why I purposefully said typically, because unless you cast a type before the double quotes, it's a string. But in that case is quite clear what the type is because it's literally telling you in the brackets.

1337

@Obsolesce said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

Yes this is a case where one point can lead to another and before you know it, it's a book.

Yeah, I here you. Well, you're right that it's vastly more important to know what constitutes a string and what doesn't versus using single or double quotes.

I guess it probably takes at least a hundred hours of study to learn the very basics of programming - if you don't have prior experience. So yeah, the things you need to know would be enough to fill a book for sure.

pmoncho

@Obsolesce said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

@Pete-S said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

Have a look at the difference between strings in double quotes and single quotes as well.

Yes this is a case where one point can lead to another and before you know it, it's a book.

I know what you mean. I once asked my high school math teacher why 1/0 is zero. I wish I could remember but she filled up the entire chalkboard with the math to prove it.

@Pete-S also. I greatly appreciate the extra info. I am always confused by single vs double quotes and when to use them. I will take your advice and use single first.

Obsolesce

@pmoncho said in Powershell "-eq" operator and "False":

I am always confused by single vs double quotes and when to use them. I will take your advice and use single first.

Single quotes are literal, double quotes resolve variables, expressions, cmdlets, anything with a $ or $() in double quotes.