ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Vultr - New Skylake processors - Can I prove I am using one?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    13 Posts 5 Posters 965 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • AdamFA
      AdamF
      last edited by

      It does. Here is what a current one (an old VPS) shows:

      processor       : 0
      vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
      cpu family      : 6
      model           : 61
      model name      : Virtual CPU a7769a6388d5
      stepping        : 2
      microcode       : 1
      cpu MHz         : 2399.998
      cache size      : 16384 KB
      physical id     : 0
      siblings        : 2
      core id         : 0
      cpu cores       : 2
      apicid          : 0
      initial apicid  : 0
      fpu             : yes
      fpu_exception   : yes
      cpuid level     : 13
      wp              : yes
      flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good xtopology unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm arat xsaveopt fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
      bogomips        : 4799.99
      clflush size    : 64
      cache_alignment : 64
      address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
      power management:
      

      Here is what a new one (just spun up with 1 core, on the $10 plan) looks like:

      processor       : 0
      vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
      cpu family      : 6
      model           : 85
      model name      : Virtual CPU 82d9ed4018dd
      stepping        : 4
      microcode       : 0x1
      cpu MHz         : 2600.000
      cache size      : 16384 KB
      physical id     : 0
      siblings        : 1
      core id         : 0
      cpu cores       : 1
      apicid          : 0
      initial apicid  : 0
      fpu             : yes
      fpu_exception   : yes
      cpuid level     : 13
      wp              : yes
      flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl xtopology eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm avx512f avx512dq clwb avx512cd avx512bw avx512vl xsaveopt arat
      bogomips        : 5200.00
      clflush size    : 64
      cache_alignment : 64
      address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
      power management:
      

      CPU Family, model, and Model Name are all different.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • black3dynamiteB
        black3dynamite
        last edited by black3dynamite

        They must be using a different cpu model.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403
          last edited by DustinB3403

          Based on what I can find here it looks like you're on a Xeon, but I also don't see a 2600 MHz unit listed that meets the other reported details. . . so take it with a grain of salt.

          0_1536863048973_2018-09-13_14-23-51.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DustinB3403D
            DustinB3403
            last edited by

            Worth considering as well that they very well could have drivers installed that simply obfuscate this and only present the most basic details based on what you've bought.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AdamFA
              AdamF
              last edited by

              Yep, I would agree. I checked around some other places and it seems that the general thought is that they do exactly what you say...they hide it, so there is no way to tell for sure.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403
                last edited by

                Obfuscating the data could help with keeping their data centers secured so I wouldn't think to much into that. But I would at least give them a call and see if they are able to prove to you where the system is running.

                AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AdamFA
                  AdamF @DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  @dustinb3403 said in Vultr - New Skylake processors - Can I prove I am using one?:

                  Obfuscating the data could help with keeping their data centers secured so I wouldn't think to much into that. But I would at least give them a call and see if they are able to prove to you where the system is running.

                  Agreed. I don't have a problem with them obfuscating the data in support of security. I just want to know if I am getting the new procs that they announced. Not a huge deal, but curious.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    Alex Sage @AdamF
                    last edited by Alex Sage

                    @fuznutz04 said in Vultr - New Skylake processors - Can I prove I am using one?:

                    Agreed. I don't have a problem with them obfuscating the data in support of security. I just want to know if I am getting the new procs that they announced. Not a huge deal, but curious.

                    Open a ticket and ask them? They reply so fast...

                    AdamFA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AdamFA
                      AdamF @Alex Sage
                      last edited by

                      @aaronstuder said in Vultr - New Skylake processors - Can I prove I am using one?:

                      @fuznutz04 said in Vultr - New Skylake processors - Can I prove I am using one?:

                      Agreed. I don't have a problem with them obfuscating the data in support of security. I just want to know if I am getting the new procs that they announced. Not a huge deal, but curious.

                      Open a ticket and ask them? They reply so fast...

                      Already did. Started this thread after I got my response. They don't tell you.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        Without having a skylake processor to compare to with the above command less /proc/cpuinfo it is probably going to be difficult to find this information.

                        If anyone on the community is running linux and has one of these processors can you post the above info and past it here to the topic?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          Its a Xeon W, I heard. Which may be why you don't see it on the list.

                          We ran a bench mark against it recently, and it was pretty obvious that it was a Skylake just for the performance jump.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post