Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
You get people injecting or drinking pure alcohol, all that goes out the door.
Which article said that?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.
If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.
You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.
basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.
I'm sure they know the difference. But they are not controlling for that difference. So it's very likely why they are seeing those results due to the drink and not the alcohol.
-
All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study. It does not factor in whay the drink is, or if they are taking other supplements... which could be the case of they are so healthy.
Bad study imho.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.
If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.
You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.
basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.
I'm sure they know the difference. But they are not controlling for that difference. So it's very likely why they are seeing those results due to the drink and not the alcohol.
If they know the difference, and are not controlling for it, that would mean that they are flat out lying.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study.
That represents something like 90% of all drinkers.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Based on less than 7 drinks per week...? Nothing to do with alcohol alone.
If i had 7 non alcoholic drinks of red wine or pomegranate juice per week... i'm sure that would still apply.
You say that, but that goes against the articles. That's a big assumption, not totally unreasonable as a theory, but it's just that. If there was a reason to believe that that was correct, you'd expect scientific research on that, and it would be obvious that saying alcohol rather than the mixers, was incorrect.
basically, you are claiming that sources like the Mayo Clinic don't know the difference between grape juice and alcohol.
I'm sure they know the difference. But they are not controlling for that difference. So it's very likely why they are seeing those results due to the drink and not the alcohol.
If they know the difference, and are not controlling for it, that would mean that they are flat out lying.
It looks like they are... It's very much a correlation case, not causation.
-
I'm not saying that US doctors aren't willing to flat out lie, or that the Mayo clinic is some gold standard of scientific rigor. I'm only pointing out that knowingly lying about the results of their study is... well lying.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study.
That represents something like 90% of all drinkers.
Where is this statistic?
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
All they are basing it off of is less than 7 drinks per day of very healthy people, as it says in that study.
That represents something like 90% of all drinkers.
Where is this statistic?
It's been published a LOT recently as the US just did a recent study and showed just how little people actually drink. I've seen it several times just this week, so in theory I can find it again.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
I'm not saying that US doctors aren't willing to flat out lie, or that the Mayo clinic is some gold standard of scientific rigor. I'm only pointing out that knowingly lying about the results of their study is... well lying.
Look at this stuff all the way through to the study's themselves. And see what they account for. Nothing to make a real determination of health and alcohol alone.
-
This one is from 2014, but it's not like these numbers change much over time.
80% of Americans have one drink OR LESS per day.
90% of Americans have two drinks or LESS per day.Only 10% of all Americans, the top decile, go past the 2 (or about 2.2) drinks per day average mark. All drinkers of 2.2 or higher fall into just 10% of the total population.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
I'm not saying that US doctors aren't willing to flat out lie, or that the Mayo clinic is some gold standard of scientific rigor. I'm only pointing out that knowingly lying about the results of their study is... well lying.
Look at this stuff all the way through to the study's themselves. And see what they account for. Nothing to make a real determination of health and alcohol alone.
That may be true, but they seem to use more rigor than the studies claiming the alcohol itself is bad. Take the recent study from the UK, they didn't even have a control group and did less, rather than more.
-
All of the "pro alcohol" studies say the same thing... If you have a healthy drink a day, you will see the health benefits of that drink, even if it contains a small amount of alcohol. But If you have more than that and those drinks contain alcohol, the negative impact of alcohol will outweigh the benefits of the drink the alcohol is in.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
This one is from 2014, but it's not like these numbers change much over time.
80% of Americans have one drink OR LESS per day.
90% of Americans have two drinks or LESS per day.Only 10% of all Americans, the top decile, go past the 2 (or about 2.2) drinks per day average mark. All drinkers of 2.2 or higher fall into just 10% of the total population.
That does not say 90 percent of drinkers are healthy.
Even if it did say something like that which it doesnt at all, it would need to account for the relatively new (young) drinkers in which alcohol consumption would not yet had time to diminish their health, and to also determine what healthy is.
Just being alive isn't a good definition of healthy.
I know a large percentage of the population drinks. I also know a large percentage of the population is unhealthy.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
All of the "pro alcohol" studies say the same thing... If you have a healthy drink a day, you will see the health benefits of that drink, even if it contains a small amount of alcohol.
That's not what the studies I've seen (and linked) claim. Maybe that's what they measured, but it is not what they state as the result. The words and meaning you are using are explicitely different than the words and meaning that they use.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
This one is from 2014, but it's not like these numbers change much over time.
80% of Americans have one drink OR LESS per day.
90% of Americans have two drinks or LESS per day.Only 10% of all Americans, the top decile, go past the 2 (or about 2.2) drinks per day average mark. All drinkers of 2.2 or higher fall into just 10% of the total population.
That does not say 90 percent of drinkers are healthy.
No, but you stated that the studies were based on a low number of drinks, I said that that low number was the normal number (or less) for normal drinkers. You asked how I knew that, I showed. No one suggested taht binge drinking around the clock is healthy. Only that heavy drinking is a small percentage of drinkers and that the studies are studying drinking rates that reflect the majority of the real world, not outliers.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
All of the "pro alcohol" studies say the same thing... If you have a healthy drink a day, you will see the health benefits of that drink, even if it contains a small amount of alcohol.
That's not what the studies I've seen (and linked) claim. Maybe that's what they measured, but it is not what they state as the result. The words and meaning you are using are explicitely different than the words and meaning that they use.
I'm not debating what they are claiming. I'm saying what they are claiming is incorrect and inconclusive based on the study they did. You can see that for yourself if you bother to check.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
I know a large percentage of the population drinks. I also know a large percentage of the population is unhealthy.
But only a tiny percentage of the population drinks heavily, and only a tiny percentage is healthy.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
I know a large percentage of the population drinks. I also know a large percentage of the population is unhealthy.
But only a tiny percentage of the population drinks heavily, and only a tiny percentage is healthy.
But if alcohol was healthy like these articles suggest, then so much more people should be healthier than they are. Most people I know wh9 drink have health issues such as high or low blood pressure, weight, or numerous other issues that you claim alcohol helps with... unless they are very young drinkers who islets not effected so much yet.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
All of the "pro alcohol" studies say the same thing... If you have a healthy drink a day, you will see the health benefits of that drink, even if it contains a small amount of alcohol.
That's not what the studies I've seen (and linked) claim. Maybe that's what they measured, but it is not what they state as the result. The words and meaning you are using are explicitely different than the words and meaning that they use.
I'm not debating what they are claiming. I'm saying what they are claiming is incorrect and inconclusive based on the study they did. You can see that for yourself if you bother to check.
That's fine, just be clear that you are saying that they are lying and falsifying the results. Which I agree they likely do, they are doctors mostly and I don't trust the field (I don't trust the process that they have to agree to to become doctors.) But those same problems exist with the studies that say that alcohol is bad. So you can't make that claim, either. If you are going to claim that you have studies that say that all alcohol is bad, then you are stuck accepting these more numerous, more rigous, and less political studies as being even more meaningful. you can't have it both ways.
As much as I don't trust doctors, the study from the UK gov't is far, far more useless as it shows nothing at all based on the complete lack of data collected.
So the bottom line is, until someone does an actual study, what we know is that alcohol poses so little health risk that there is no rational reason to be concerned about it as no one can find conclusive evidence of its risk except in extreme amounts that are not normal and that applies to all things, even things we know are healthy in small dosages. What we don't know is if alcohol in "proper" amounts is actually healthy, unhealthy, or neutral. But we do know that it is so close to neutral that modern medicine can't agree on which side it falls.
