SW rant time
-
@scottalanmiller said in SW rant time:
@tim_g said in SW rant time:
Woah... where did this thread go? Anyone spin me up on the last 150 posts in a sentence or two? No way I have time to back-read.
Summary: "Are US companies bound by the laws of other countries?"
That's really the conversation? That's bizarre.
-
@coliver said in SW rant time:
@scottalanmiller said in SW rant time:
@tim_g said in SW rant time:
Woah... where did this thread go? Anyone spin me up on the last 150 posts in a sentence or two? No way I have time to back-read.
Summary: "Are US companies bound by the laws of other countries?"
That's really the conversation? That's bizarre.
Yes, that's where it went. There was a feeling that ML needed to be bound by EU laws for some reason. And it went from there.
-
Let's get back on track...
SPICEWORKS SUUUUUCKS!!!!!
-
@rojoloco said in SW rant time:
Let's get back on track...
SPICEWORKS SUUUUUCKS!!!!!
and more specifically the biased arbitrary actions of some of the mods!
-
-
@nadnerb I like that one.
-
@nadnerb said in SW rant time:
I feel like this meme should be inserted after every 10 posts on Mango.
-
@mike-davis That many?
-
-
So we went from Spiceworks to Extradition? 0_o
-
@mike-davis said in SW rant time:
@nadnerb said in SW rant time:
I feel like this meme should be inserted after every 10 posts on Mango.
Seems like a good use of ad space
so we always remember to stay off topic... -
-
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
-
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
-
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
I havent been on in a while, and never used it much.. pretty slow witted crowd?
-
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
I havent been on in a while, and never used it much.. pretty slow witted crowd?
I wouldn't say slow witted.... maybe gullible is a better word. . .
-
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
I havent been on in a while, and never used it much.. pretty slow witted crowd?
I wouldn't say slow witted.... maybe gullible is a better word. . .
So rules are required. Do no harm to unwitting IT lackeys. No purchase suggestions or scripts that delete hard drives...
-
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
I havent been on in a while, and never used it much.. pretty slow witted crowd?
I wouldn't say slow witted.... maybe gullible is a better word. . .
So rules are required. Do no harm to unwitting IT lackeys. No purchase suggestions or scripts that delete hard drives...
That's one of the bigger problems, there are SO many people that use the environment as a means to do as much harm as they can get away with because of the high gullibility factor.
-
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
I havent been on in a while, and never used it much.. pretty slow witted crowd?
I wouldn't say slow witted.... maybe gullible is a better word. . .
So rules are required. Do no harm to unwitting IT lackeys. No purchase suggestions or scripts that delete hard drives...
So a 92TB OBR5 on 5200 winchesters would fall into that category . .
-
@scottalanmiller said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
@dustinb3403 said in SW rant time:
@bigbear said in SW rant time:
Maybe every Monday we have a cross-over post, where everyone upvotes a single thread with spoof OP and spoof suggestions/answers/commetns.
Like 4chan vs Reddit
I'd be for this except I'd feel bad if someone went with one of the totally insane and horrible suggestions for production. . .
I havent been on in a while, and never used it much.. pretty slow witted crowd?
I wouldn't say slow witted.... maybe gullible is a better word. . .
So rules are required. Do no harm to unwitting IT lackeys. No purchase suggestions or scripts that delete hard drives...
That's one of the bigger problems, there are SO many people that use the environment as a means to do as much harm as they can get away with because of the high gullibility factor.
What needs to happen ( i find myself in this boat some times) is that I'm lead to water, but don't drink.
Provide concise, concrete evidence for something and leave it at that because if its more than a paragraph or two most people seem to just skip all of it and come up with some summary. Which turns out to be a bastardized version of what was recommended.
