Remix OS Singularity
-
@scottalanmiller said in Remix OS Singularity:
@dafyre said in Remix OS Singularity:
@scottalanmiller said in Remix OS Singularity:
@dafyre said in Remix OS Singularity:
@scottalanmiller said in Remix OS Singularity:
@Dashrender said in Remix OS Singularity:
@scottalanmiller said in Remix OS Singularity:
But I really think that the intended use case here is very, very much the grandmas of the world. They would like something like a laptop at home once in a while, have no power user tasks and mostly just need a phone. This could let them "scale up" once in a while when needed and have it "go away" the rest of the time.
But does it go away? As you mentioned before, it's a monitor keyboard and mouse on a desk somewhere.
Unless you're talking about docking it into a laptop shell?
Television.
We can do that with phones now, as long as you have the right adapters.
But they don't work like a desktop, that's the whole point. Yes, my iPhone will connect to a keyboard and monitor, but it is still very much a phone interface.
I don't see that changing much -- even Remix's tablet interface looks like a phone / touch interface to me... I may be slightly biased by owning one of their tablets, lol.
But it uses a mouse and has windowing right?
Pretty much any Android 6 (and up) device can handle a keyboard, mouse and windowing.
By default each app is full screen (like on a phone), but yes, you can minimize, etc.
Remix seems to do this extremely well.
-
Has anyone heard of the UDOO X86 boards that are coming out this year? - it started off from a kickstarter campaign:
-
Not going to go back an quote things.
The point that the company has to provide two of everything is flawed. If they provide the phone and adapter they can leave the home side on the user. Obviously if they require working from home, they are likely more obligated to provide the environment. Most home based sales people I know have a KVM setup for their laptop at home that they supplied because they like it better than their company laptop alone.
The company can easily handle providing the KVM at the office because they would have it anyway for a desktop.
To another point, of course it is not supposed to be a laptop replacement. It is supposed to be a replacement for a docked laptop (docked being loosed used in this case to refer to one sitting on a desk for long periods or actually docked).
To @Dashrender's point of the documents being with them, well duh, that has nothing to do with the actual hardware and is a solution that would have to be decided with a desktop or laptop at home anyway.
To @scottalanmiller's point of laptops being more usable. They are only in so much that they have the keyboard and screen included. but you pay the price of carrying around that weight. So more usable is a relative term based on perception and use case. With a device and a KVM at home you only have to carry the device and adapter back and forth, instead of the entire laptop.
@DustinB3403 said something about double everything. Well as I think you see, double is the user's choice. Full system at work, work from device on the road and at home unless they choose to enhance the home experience.
tl;dr: I think this is honestly a solid solution once the mobile OS get fully up to speed. People will adapt.
-
@JaredBusch said in Remix OS Singularity:
To @scottalanmiller's point of laptops being more usable. They are only in so much that they have the keyboard and screen included. but you pay the price of carrying around that weight. So more usable is a relative term based on perception and use case. With a device and a KVM at home you only have to carry the device and adapter back and forth, instead of the entire laptop.
I totally get that, but once you are "two points" rather than "generally mobile" it seems like two desktops is cheaper than one phone. A desktop is cheaper to acquire and lasts much longer. I'm not saying that there is no exception, but the idea of it being a tiny desktop that you carry from work to home but can't use anywhere else means it isn't competing with existing mobile solutions, but only existing stationary ones.
If a phone is $700 and good for two to three years, and a desktop is $600 but good for five and I need two desktops, that's $1200 over five years instead of $1,750 and I get two devices instead of one. Now there is a good point about maybe the company is buying phones anyway, and then that changes a lot of things. But for just the desktop piece, I don't think that it competes well at all. If we are looking at "enhancing the phone" there is some argument. If we are looking at "replacing a desktop" I think it looks poor. If we are looking at "replacing a laptop" I think it's no contest.
-
work from a phone at home? really? yeah - no.
I completely agree with you on the laptop side, that if the user wants a better experience at home, that's on them.. because the laptop is a fully workable solution.
But a expecting actual work long term to be done from a phone interface is insane and most likely super inefficient. If the processing power is a phone, then the office should be supplying the better interface at home as well.
-
@Dashrender It won't be a phone interface, but a full working desktop interface, well in theory
-
@StuartJordan said in Remix OS Singularity:
@Dashrender It won't be a phone interface, but a full working desktop interface, well in theory
on the phone screen? JB is claiming that the device while used not in the office would just be on the screen of the device itself, which I'm saying is to small to be useful for doing long term work at home.
-
@Dashrender I believe is should detect what mode you are running in.
-
LOL
that's great - still, not the point.I don't care about the interface - I assume it's working as desired.
I was arguing against JB's opinion that the office shouldn't have to provide the user with home based KVM stuff if they provide them this phone to work from home with.
-
@Dashrender said in Remix OS Singularity:
@StuartJordan said in Remix OS Singularity:
@Dashrender It won't be a phone interface, but a full working desktop interface, well in theory
on the phone screen? JB is claiming that the device while used not in the office would just be on the screen of the device itself, which I'm saying is to small to be useful for doing long term work at home.
That is not what I said, read it again.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Remix OS Singularity:
@JaredBusch said in Remix OS Singularity:
To @scottalanmiller's point of laptops being more usable. They are only in so much that they have the keyboard and screen included. but you pay the price of carrying around that weight. So more usable is a relative term based on perception and use case. With a device and a KVM at home you only have to carry the device and adapter back and forth, instead of the entire laptop.
I totally get that, but once you are "two points" rather than "generally mobile" it seems like two desktops is cheaper than one phone. A desktop is cheaper to acquire and lasts much longer. I'm not saying that there is no exception, but the idea of it being a tiny desktop that you carry from work to home but can't use anywhere else means it isn't competing with existing mobile solutions, but only existing stationary ones.
If a phone is $700 and good for two to three years, and a desktop is $600 but good for five and I need two desktops, that's $1200 over five years instead of $1,750 and I get two devices instead of one. Now there is a good point about maybe the company is buying phones anyway, and then that changes a lot of things. But for just the desktop piece, I don't think that it competes well at all. If we are looking at "enhancing the phone" there is some argument. If we are looking at "replacing a desktop" I think it looks poor. If we are looking at "replacing a laptop" I think it's no contest.
I don't know where you buy business desktops, but they are not $600.
-
@JaredBusch said in Remix OS Singularity:
If they provide the phone and adapter they can leave the home side on the user. Obviously if they require working from home, they are likely more obligated to provide the environment.
You're right - they are IMO much more obligated to provide the environment. If the user wasn't meant to work at home, why would the office even give them your stated adapter?
I was simply stressing the second part of your statement as quoted above to drive home the point that IMO the company would ALWAYS provide that equipment if the user was expected to work at home.
Most home based sales people I know have a KVM setup for their laptop at home that they supplied because they like it better than their company laptop alone.
And I completely agree with this. You want more than the laptop we gave you while at home, that's on you, the end user.
-
@JaredBusch said in Remix OS Singularity:
I don't know where you buy business desktops, but they are not $600.
The last HP version of the NUC I purchased were $800/ea. But that was for the EliteDesk version. I'm guessing the ProDesk version can easily be had for $600 or less.
-
@Dashrender said in Remix OS Singularity:
And I completely agree with this. You want more than the laptop we gave you while at home, that's on you, the end user.
This applies to the hypothetical phone situation in this thread too.
-
Most companies I know would supply the equipment to be able to do the task needed, although users could have the option to use their own keyboard and mouse if they really wanted to.
-
@JaredBusch said in Remix OS Singularity:
@Dashrender said in Remix OS Singularity:
And I completely agree with this. You want more than the laptop we gave you while at home, that's on you, the end user.
This applies to the hypothetical phone situation in this thread too.
You as a business owner would fully expect an employee to do all of your daily tasks from a phone interface if they are unwilling to provide their own KVM while at home? damn you're a horrible boss.
-
@Dashrender said in Remix OS Singularity:
@JaredBusch said in Remix OS Singularity:
@Dashrender said in Remix OS Singularity:
And I completely agree with this. You want more than the laptop we gave you while at home, that's on you, the end user.
This applies to the hypothetical phone situation in this thread too.
You as a business owner would fully expect an employee to do all of your daily tasks from a phone interface if they are unwilling to provide their own KVM while at home? damn you're a horrible boss.
That is not what I said either.
