ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    IT Infrastructure health checkup

    IT Discussion
    infrastructure
    9
    27
    5.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dafyreD
      dafyre @coliver
      last edited by

      @coliver Thanks. That one looks pretty slick.

      coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • coliverC
        coliver @dafyre
        last edited by

        @dafyre said:

        @coliver Thanks. That one looks pretty slick.

        I've been trying to get it working for a bit. I really like the Kibana interface I just need to get NXLog and Logstash working together.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • AmbarishrhA
          Ambarishrh
          last edited by Ambarishrh

          Lets assume this is a one time job for a client, I would assume the tools would be:

          BPA for the corresponding MS product
          Lynis for Linux security Audit
          For exchange, points mentioned by @Breffni-Potter
          AD- tools suggested by @thecreativeone91
          OpenVAS or Nexpose or Nessus or GFI Languard
          MBSA
          Sydi for network documentation

          Not sure on a one time audit, if we can use some sort of log management

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Deleted74295D
            Deleted74295 Banned
            last edited by

            Yes you have to check logs for a one time audit, otherwise what's the point?

            If the DC is screaming about an easily preventable group policy conflict, how will you pick that up apart from logs?

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @Deleted74295
              last edited by

              @Breffni-Potter said:

              Yes you have to check logs for a one time audit, otherwise what's the point?

              If the DC is screaming about an easily preventable group policy conflict, how will you pick that up apart from logs?

              Automation can still be done on the logs so it's not a manual process of looking through everything. It will also centralize it.

              Also a DC is not going to tell you about a GP conflict, that's client side. RoSP or GPresult on the client machine will tell you about those. However, the are avoided by using enforced GPOs where needed. However aside from the setting not being applied there's no actual harm to GP conflicts.

              Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Deleted74295D
                Deleted74295 Banned @A Former User
                last edited by

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                However aside from the setting not being applied there's no actual harm to GP conflicts.

                Speaking broadly, with a badly setup GP you can get delayed logins and other strange issues.

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @Deleted74295
                  last edited by

                  @Breffni-Potter said:

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  However aside from the setting not being applied there's no actual harm to GP conflicts.

                  Speaking broadly, with a badly setup GP you can get delayed logins and other strange issues.

                  Not from conflicting settings you won't get delayed logins. Conflicting settings will just allow one to override the other.

                  Delayed logins come from permissions issues, trying to do to much, bad settings or corrupt Sysvol and too much WMI filtering.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  • 2 / 2
                  • First post
                    Last post