ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CloudatCost Server Vanished

    IT Discussion
    cloudatcost
    6
    40
    4.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User @scottalanmiller
      last edited by A Former User

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @thecreativeone91 said:

      Yep. And Red Hat licensing is actually worse than Windows Server.

      Not really, it comes with awesome support. Windows you just pay to have the right to be unsupported.

      lol. True. The right to be unsupported.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @A Former User
        last edited by

        @thecreativeone91 said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @thecreativeone91 said:

        Yep. And Red Hat licensing is actually worse than Windows Server.

        Not really, it comes with awesome support. Windows you just pay to have the right to be unsupported.

        lol. True. The right to be unsupported.

        The Red Hat equivalent to Windows is...... CentOS. Microsoft doesn't even have a RHEL equivalent offering.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ?
          A Former User @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @Dashrender said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          Same with Red Hat. If you want RHEL, you need it through the cloud provider, you can't bring your own. Only the free, open source OSes transparently work in a cloud setting. The cloud is making open source so much easier to use.

          It is?

          Yes, global workloads are shifting to open source at an unbelievable pace. The cloud is the primary driver. Licensing for things like Windows is so much more dramatic to today's businesses than it used to be.

          There's big pushes to get linux to a centrally controllable system much like group policy even for local deplyoments. FreeIPA has the authentication part down but is suppose to be working on the rest. http://www.freeipa.org/page/Main_Page

          Samaba 4 was suppose to be into this as well.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Just use Chef or whatever.

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Just use Chef or whatever.

              Not really the same thing. Great for cloud and servers. Not good for end users machines.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @A Former User
                last edited by

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                Just use Chef or whatever.

                Not really the same thing. Great for cloud and servers. Not good for end users machines.

                Is that really true? What aspect of it do you find really that different than GPO? I can do pretty similar things with both. Not identical, obviously.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by

                  You're basically having to program everything. It's more like a poorly implemented SCCM than it is group policy. If you want the GUI with Puppet it will cost you quiet a bit.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @thecreativeone91 said:

                    You're basically having to program everything. It's more like a poorly implemented SCCM than it is group policy. If you want the GUI with Puppet it will cost you quiet a bit.

                    True, but often programming things makes things easier in the long run. And there are tons of recipes already available. So you can do a lot with Chef without writing your own stuff.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @Dashrender said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      Same with Red Hat. If you want RHEL, you need it through the cloud provider, you can't bring your own. Only the free, open source OSes transparently work in a cloud setting. The cloud is making open source so much easier to use.

                      It is?

                      Would, keeping open source as easy as it always was but making everything else so much harder, make more sense?

                      I suppose, MS is definitely falling behind. The old days of customers having one, two or even three servers are pretty much over. Anyone, especially SMBs can easily have 3+ servers all on a single host. They definitely need to rework the pricing structure, simplifying it for cloud use as well.

                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User @Dashrender
                        last edited by A Former User

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        Same with Red Hat. If you want RHEL, you need it through the cloud provider, you can't bring your own. Only the free, open source OSes transparently work in a cloud setting. The cloud is making open source so much easier to use.

                        It is?

                        Would, keeping open source as easy as it always was but making everything else so much harder, make more sense?

                        I suppose, MS is definitely falling behind. The old days of customers having one, two or even three servers are pretty much over. Anyone, especially SMBs can easily have 3+ servers all on a single host. They definitely need to rework the pricing structure, simplifying it for cloud use as well.

                        Well, I think Microsoft knows their main focus going forward is not going to be windows at least not with businesses. It will be SaaS and IaaS. Windows for local installs will probably become more of a consumer thing and windows will likely get replace with something else (linux etc) in the enterprise. but that's a good while off.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                          windows will likely get replace with something else (linux etc) in the enterprise. but that's a good while off.

                          That's been happening for years. The shift to Linux from Windows has been huge.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 2 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post