Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers
-
Just adding 2FA to RDP is a better option.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Just adding 2FA to RDP is a better option.
I wonder if that would mitigate the authentication bypass problem that RDP had a few months ago?
-
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
I don't understand how the use of RDP could do anything to cause multiple logins?
If you RDP in to your desktop using the same login as usual then everything is exactly the same as if you're physically there.
Login 1 : User logs into business issued laptop
Login 2 : User connects to company over SSLVPN using domain credentials
Login 3 : User connects to their internal physical PC via RDP using their domain credentialsOn top of this, sometimes the company issued laptop is encrypted and they must enter a password (if there's no TPM chip).
Then there are usually prompts between the SSLVPN and RDP steps such as SSL cert and other pop-ups. Yes they can check "dont ask again" but this all adds to the chunkiness of everything.We also had some telephony/call quality issues (that I won't go into) but I will say that I'm just trying to find something that makes the best use of the remote session in terms of data transmission, so like RDP vs ICA or something. I'm not too knowledgeable in this area though.
I wanted to figure out a solution for allowing the users to login to their company issued laptops and then click one or twice and get to their remote desktops as easily and as efficiently as possible.
-
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Then there are usually prompts between the SSLVPN and RDP steps such as SSL cert and other pop-ups. Yes they can check "dont ask again" but this all adds to the chunkiness of everything.
Those are problems that can be fixed, though. Those particular ones should not be like that.
-
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
I wanted to figure out a solution for allowing the users to login to their company issued laptops and then click one or twice and get to their remote desktops as easily and as efficiently as possible.
You CAN make all or most of the credentials between that laptop and the resulting device be cached or saved. So that it is a really quick and painless process.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Then there are usually prompts between the SSLVPN and RDP steps such as SSL cert and other pop-ups. Yes they can check "dont ask again" but this all adds to the chunkiness of everything.
Those are problems that can be fixed, though. Those particular ones should not be like that.
ok disregard then.. not worth mentioning
-
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Login 1 : User logs into business issued laptop
Login 2 : User connects to company over SSLVPN using domain credentials
Login 3 : User connects to their internal physical PC via RDP using their domain credentialsWhile all of those exist, managing them is the key.
You CAN make Login 2 be automated as something that just connects once the laptop turns on and/or once the user logs in. Transparent to the user.
You CAN do the same with Login 3. Have the RDP client simply save the credentials. Nearly all users choose to do this anyway.
-
Now each time you save the credentials, you make the laptop a bit more risk if it were to be compromised. So it is all about balance. But if you want to, you can make all those piece be pretty much transparent and fast.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
I wanted to figure out a solution for allowing the users to login to their company issued laptops and then click one or twice and get to their remote desktops as easily and as efficiently as possible.
You CAN make all or most of the credentials between that laptop and the resulting device be cached or saved. So that it is a really quick and painless process.
True but if a user's password expires or they change it, they may get themselves locked out. We try not to encourage saving passwords too much.
-
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@scottalanmiller said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
I wanted to figure out a solution for allowing the users to login to their company issued laptops and then click one or twice and get to their remote desktops as easily and as efficiently as possible.
You CAN make all or most of the credentials between that laptop and the resulting device be cached or saved. So that it is a really quick and painless process.
True but if a user's password expires or they change it, they may get themselves locked out. We try not to encourage saving passwords too much.
For security reasons, we avoid expiring passwords. That's what makes users write them down and make them easy to guess. Non-expiring, or rarely expiring passwords, are shown to be far more secure and make things like this much easier.
-
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
We try not to encourage saving passwords too much.
Remember that there are passwords still not-being saved. The issue is eliminating how many times that they have to remember and type them in. Possibly the same one over and over again, as well.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@scottalanmiller said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
I wanted to figure out a solution for allowing the users to login to their company issued laptops and then click one or twice and get to their remote desktops as easily and as efficiently as possible.
You CAN make all or most of the credentials between that laptop and the resulting device be cached or saved. So that it is a really quick and painless process.
True but if a user's password expires or they change it, they may get themselves locked out. We try not to encourage saving passwords too much.
For security reasons, we avoid expiring passwords. That's what makes users write them down and make them easy to guess. Non-expiring, or rarely expiring passwords, are shown to be far more secure and make things like this much easier.
yeah I know its a balance. We have had a few trade offs between password length and expiration time
-
@dave247 said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Login 1 : User logs into business issued laptop
Login 2 : User connects to company over SSLVPN using domain credentials
Login 3 : User connects to their internal physical PC via RDP using their domain credentialsDo they use the domain credentials to log in on the laptop as well?
What's the timeout on the laptop / VPN link / desktop (over RDP) that would require them to have to login again?
Also are you using split tunneling on the VPN connection or is all traffic passing over VPN when connected?
-
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Also are you using split tunneling on the VPN connection or is all traffic passing over VPN when connected?
I'm curious how this plays into the current conversation?
-
@Dashrender said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Also are you using split tunneling on the VPN connection or is all traffic passing over VPN when connected?
I'm curious how this plays into the current conversation?
OP said he wanted to "make the best use of the remote session in terms of data transmission". It also plays into the security issue, together with credentials and logins.
-
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Dashrender said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Also are you using split tunneling on the VPN connection or is all traffic passing over VPN when connected?
I'm curious how this plays into the current conversation?
OP said he wanted to "make the best use of the remote session in terms of data transmission". It also plays into the security issue, together with credentials and logins.
aww - definitely understand the bandwidth portion, but not the creds/logins though.
-
@Dashrender said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Dashrender said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Also are you using split tunneling on the VPN connection or is all traffic passing over VPN when connected?
I'm curious how this plays into the current conversation?
OP said he wanted to "make the best use of the remote session in terms of data transmission". It also plays into the security issue, together with credentials and logins.
aww - definitely understand the bandwidth portion, but not the creds/logins though.
Split tunneling is in general considered less secure because the user's computer is basically bridging the internet and your corporate network. And you have zero or little control over the traffic outside the VPN, unless you have some security in place for this.
When not using multi-factor authentication for the VPN tunnel (which the OP isn't) you are more susceptible to phishing attacks.
With split-tunneling and no 2FA on the VPN it's much easier to trick the users to enter their credentials into something that looks just like real thing.
That's how it ties into the security - overall risk.
Here are some covid-19 recommendations for VPNs.
https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/aa20-073aMicrosoft have some new recommendations on how to do split tunneling VPN, particular with O365 and on-prem, to make it secure and to take load and bandwidth off the VPN connection.
Not related to security but it's also possible to have a bandwidth limitation in the VPN appliance without having a bandwidth limitation on the WAN link. There is usually a maximum VPN bandwidth in the firewall / VPN appliance.
-
I don't know the best solution to @dave247 and his clunkyness problem.
But I'm thinking if you can raise the security on the VPN link with 2FA, you could probably relax screen savers, VPN link timeouts and other things.
Workers that are 100% remote should basically only have to login once per day and establish their RDP session and then just have screen lock on their laptop.
-
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Dashrender said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Dashrender said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Also are you using split tunneling on the VPN connection or is all traffic passing over VPN when connected?
I'm curious how this plays into the current conversation?
OP said he wanted to "make the best use of the remote session in terms of data transmission". It also plays into the security issue, together with credentials and logins.
aww - definitely understand the bandwidth portion, but not the creds/logins though.
Split tunneling is in general considered less secure because the user's computer is basically bridging the internet and your corporate network. And you have zero or little control over the traffic outside the VPN, unless you have some security in place for this.
When not using multi-factor authentication for the VPN tunnel (which the OP isn't) you are more susceptible to phishing attacks.
With split-tunneling and no 2FA on the VPN it's much easier to trick the users to enter their credentials into something that looks just like real thing.
That's how it ties into the security - overall risk.
Here are some covid-19 recommendations for VPNs.
https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/aa20-073aMicrosoft have some new recommendations on how to do split tunneling VPN, particular with O365 and on-prem, to make it secure and to take load and bandwidth off the VPN connection.
Not related to security but it's also possible to have a bandwidth limitation in the VPN appliance without having a bandwidth limitation on the WAN link. There is usually a maximum VPN bandwidth in the firewall / VPN appliance.
We do split tunneling since it doesn't make sense to send/receive ALL traffic through the VPN connection. The connection is secure since we use our security appliance's specific SSLVPN application for users to connect through with specifically configured settings.
-
@Pete-S said in Looking for solutions to allow remote users access to their internal psychical computers:
Split tunneling is in general considered less secure because the user's computer is basically bridging the internet and your corporate network. And you have zero or little control over the traffic outside the VPN, unless you have some security in place for this.
While true, you have that risk with VPNs anyway because even if you don't split the traffic, the end point device goes to "dangerous" locations then returns so acts like it is split all the time. VPNs are just a huge danger in general.
