ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Simple E-Mail Retention Policy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    66 Posts 9 Posters 21.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by Dashrender

      If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

      scottalanmillerS Deleted74295D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
        last edited by

        @Breffni-Potter said:

        I had one incident with a company who had a 7 seven figure contract for a very long term project, retrieving those emails from 2012 meant that a huge amount of money was not lost. They now have an email archiving solution for such incidents.

        Coming from big banking, email retention is not encouraged 🙂 The cost of saving unnecessary emails is huge. And the biggest cost is that you somehow fail to keep them or they don't get kept consistently. The longer you archive, the more the risk goes up.

        Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Deleted74295D
          Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          Archiving isn't the cost. Discovery is the cost.

          if the lawyers are involved, sure.

          With one email archive box I used, emails from 2007 to 2014, in and out. Took a minute or 2 to find what I needed. It's like google-fu.

          scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said:

            If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

            bwahahaha

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
              last edited by

              @Breffni-Potter said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Archiving isn't the cost. Discovery is the cost.

              if the lawyers are involved, sure.

              That's pretty much what all email retention discussions are around. The primary discussion in the US around email retention is only about legal hold and discovery, nothing else. It is so risky and so expensive that everything else is pointless to really consider.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Deleted74295D
                Deleted74295 Banned @Dashrender
                last edited by

                @Dashrender said:

                If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

                Not the whole contract but many companies do have problems.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                  last edited by

                  @Breffni-Potter said:

                  With one email archive box I used, emails from 2007 to 2014, in and out. Took a minute or 2 to find what I needed. It's like google-fu.

                  The concern is not finding "something", it is proving that there is "nothing."

                  DashrenderD Deleted74295D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Deleted74295D
                    Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    Coming from big banking, email retention is not encouraged 🙂

                    2008

                    drops the mic, walks off stage

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @Dashrender said:

                      If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

                      bwahahaha

                      I'm not sure what this means?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

                        bwahahaha

                        I'm not sure what this means?

                        Nor I.

                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @Breffni-Potter said:

                          With one email archive box I used, emails from 2007 to 2014, in and out. Took a minute or 2 to find what I needed. It's like google-fu.

                          The concern is not finding "something", it is proving that there is "nothing."

                          Exactly - look at the Hilary thing - she's trying to prove that classified stuff was never sent to her personal non protected account. Which is pretty much impossible to prove.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by Dashrender

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

                            bwahahaha

                            I'm not sure what this means?

                            Nor I.

                            I know what my statement means, but I don't understand your laughing.. did I miss something?

                            Maybe you're laughing in agreement?

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @Deleted74295
                              last edited by

                              @Breffni-Potter said:

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              Coming from big banking, email retention is not encouraged 🙂

                              2008

                              drops the mic, walks off stage

                              eh?

                              Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Deleted74295D
                                Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                The concern is not finding "something", it is proving that there is "nothing."

                                It's an absurdity. How can a court say "Prove you did not do this" - Imagine being sued for selling racist neo nazi sports-wear, would the court ask you to prove you did not sell them? Or would the burden of proof be on the plantiff?

                                @Dashrender said:

                                Exactly - look at the Hilary thing - she's trying to prove that classified stuff was never sent to her personal non protected account. Which is pretty much impossible to prove.

                                Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Maybe they should arrest people at random for shop-lifting and ask "can you prove you did NOT steal those sweets?"

                                scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  If there was a chance at a loss of a 7 figure contract if you couldn't find the email then you had/have much more severe problems besides email archiving.

                                  bwahahaha

                                  I'm not sure what this means?

                                  Nor I.

                                  I know what my statement means, but I don't understand your laughing.. did I miss something?

                                  Maybe you're laughing in agreement?

                                  I didn't laugh, I just said that I didn't understand either.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Deleted74295D
                                    Deleted74295 Banned @Dashrender
                                    last edited by

                                    @Dashrender said:

                                    @Breffni-Potter said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    Coming from big banking, email retention is not encouraged 🙂

                                    2008

                                    drops the mic, walks off stage

                                    eh?

                                    A small financial crash which left many unemployed and various folks financial worse off. So it's no surprise that the industry largely responsible for such a crash doesn't want to leave a paper trial of what it does.

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                                      last edited by

                                      @Breffni-Potter said:

                                      It's an absurdity. How can a court say "Prove you did not do this" - Imagine being sued for selling racist neo nazi sports-wear, would the court ask you to prove you did not sell them? Or would the burden of proof be on the plantiff?

                                      Welcome to the evils of living under places based on British common law. It's the worst.

                                      With email, in the US at least, you have to be able to prove that you have retained everything and then either search it, pay to search it or let the opposition search it (depending on the scenario I assume) and often all three. When you retain email you risk exposure because someone else might subpoena your emails!! Email retention is a big risk, even if you don't do anything wrong here.

                                      Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                                        last edited by

                                        @Breffni-Potter said:

                                        A small financial crash which left many unemployed and various folks financial worse off. So it's no surprise that the industry largely responsible for such a crash doesn't want to leave a paper trial of what it does.

                                        That's a very outsider view. Inside finance they would have welcomed having those records. Trust me, working in those banks at the time, everything the outside world heard and acted on was a lie. It was the government causing issues, not the banks. And, of course, tons and tons of bad borrowers thinking that they could scam someone and getting burnt trying to get away with something.

                                        Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Deleted74295D
                                          Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          With email, in the US at least, you have to be able to prove that you have retained everything and then either search it, pay to search it or let the opposition search it (depending on the scenario I assume) and often all three. When you retain email you risk exposure because someone else might subpoena your emails!! Email retention is a big risk, even if you don't do anything wrong here.

                                          Ok let's assume they do subpoena them, you let them search them, they find nothing because there is nothing for them to find.

                                          Where's the problem for you? If it's their money and their time to search through the emails?

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Deleted74295D
                                            Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            That's a very outsider view. Inside finance they would have welcomed having those records.

                                            So who is responsible for this:

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            Coming from big banking, email retention is not encouraged 🙂

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post