Why not use the official docker images on fedora?
![](https://i.imgur.com/1vX8MW8.jpg)
Posts made by matteo nunziati
-
RE: Guacamole 0.9.14 on CentOS 7
-
RE: KVM Backing and Support
@black3dynamite said in KVM Backing and Support:
I’m curious if BTRFS and ZFS can do CBT?
They do for snapshotting. ZFS is reference on write. I think btrfs is the same. Then you need to compress and export snapshots.
-
RE: Project Management solutions
@darek-hamann said in Project Management solutions:
Yeah, Jira is good indeed.
I like the design too but he says he doesn't care about...
-
RE: Project Management solutions
@jaredbusch said in Project Management solutions:
So over in this thread @Ambarishrh had this.
Re: Project management for internal IT projects and tasks
@ambarishrh said in Project management for internal IT projects and tasks:
I am looking for a tool that can be used for internal projects with the following features:
- Create project, set milestones and target dates
- create individual tasks and subtasks, assign to 1 or more techs
- Analyse the overall tasks completion/performance of teams
- Generate high-level reports for management
- Add notes, comments etc.
- Self-hosted and free if possible.
Part of our O365, we have MS planner, been using it for few weeks and not really happy with that (mentioned this on another thread in ML)
I do not have the Self-hosted requirement, but I also do not mind self hosting.
I do not want to pay for a solution right now. If we find one and like it and want more features that require payment, I am happy to.
These are the solutions that I saw listed and liked:
- OpenProject - https://www.openproject.org - Self hosted most features - feature comparison
- Asana - https://asana.com - SaaS free to 15 users few features - feature comparison
- MeisterTask - https://www.meistertask.com - free unlimited users/projects, many features - feature comparison
These I saw listed and did not care for:
- Nozbe
- Teamwork
- OrangeScrum
- Jira
Beyond that list, what would people recommend?
Asana is too simple for me. I'm using it as a customer requirement. Openproject is a bit clumsy but quite detailed. Used it in the past. I ignore the last one.
It is a bit overkill for your requirements but I'm liking flowlu currently. -
RE: Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup
@black3dynamite said in Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup:
@lj said in Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup:
Altaro trial does continuous data protection but I think that will cease functioning when the trial plays out.
You would have to purchase the Unlimited Plus Edition.
https://www.altaro.com/vm-backup/pricing.phpNo the free is just limited by the number or vm. No more than 2. But it is always free.
-
RE: Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup
@lj said in Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup:
@matteo-nunziati I appreciate your humble opinion. What do you suggest? BTW for now I only have plans for 2 VMs.
Well if you have just 2vm altaro free gives you the same as paid version with the exception of azure block storage. So I would go altaro.
Other suggested solutions are agent non agentless. They run from within the vm not from outside (hypervisor level)
-
RE: Gsuite and Outlook Archiving
I've used in the past a specific tool from google to upload a pst on gmail. It works great. I've just to find it out again...
-
RE: Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup
In any case both they are a no go. IMHO.
-
RE: Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup
@lj said in Microsoft Hyper-V server 2016 and RD1000 backup:
I installed Altaro VM Backup and it recognized the RD1000 and backed up to it. I can backup VMs to the RD1000 but not the host itself. I don't think that will be too big a problem so I consider this issue solved. Next issue: Altaro free vs. Veeam free.
Altaro free just 2 vm. Veeam free no scheduling must backup supervised.
-
RE: KVM Backing and Support
@scottalanmiller said in KVM Backing and Support:
@matteo-nunziati said in KVM Backing and Support:
@scottalanmiller said in KVM Backing and Support:
@matteo-nunziati said in KVM Backing and Support:
- Why do you worry about these things with agent based and not with agentless, even though they are equal and both affected by them just the same?
Because I install altaro have a single admin interface an can backup delta vm in a few minutes.
Sure, but Veeam agentless will do that, too. There are good options in both directions.
Sure. My point was: I'm not aware of a win/linux solution agent based with central management which costs less then agentless. Therefore when I deployed kvm it was with some mix and match stuff got from github and glued into some.bash script. Ok for me but not really nice to offload to others. My ignorance about Good non diy backup solutions is the only reason I do not deploy kvm again.
Grr... Damn phone. Lot of typos...
-
RE: Hyper-V replication, Starwind, or something else?
@jaredbusch done replication outside of AD not complex just a matter of certificates. If I dig I should find some notes. But I have to translate them.
-
RE: KVM Backing and Support
@scottalanmiller said in KVM Backing and Support:
@matteo-nunziati said in KVM Backing and Support:
My biggest concerns w/ agent based are:
- A nas IS cheap don't bore too much about space. Just backup.
- is there a cheap solution with centraluzed management of backups? Cross platform?
Any hints?!
- The storage component is not related to agent vs. agentless. I'm not sure what you are asking here. You need a place to store the backups identically between different backup approaches.
Its about the price and perf for a full bloated vm backup vs small data backup
- Agent based is the norm, agentless is the niche. There are 10-100 options of agent based for every agentless one. And the big players, like Veeam, Unitrends, etc offer both. It's "how you deploy the product", not what product you choose in many cases. And yes, there are free options.
Yes I'm aware of pay options but they are expensive. What I miss is a cheap centrslized backup solution w/ agents. Just to say Veeam is expensive here.
- What does cross platform mean in this context?
I mean I can install the same agent both on win and linux
- Why do you worry about these things with agent based and not with agentless, even though they are equal and both affected by them just the same?
Because I install altaro have a single admin interface an can backup delta vm in a few minutes.
-
RE: KVM Backing and Support
@scottalanmiller said in KVM Backing and Support:
@jaredbusch said in KVM Backing and Support:
@scottalanmiller said in KVM Backing and Support:
Use agent based,
Screw that shit. Let's just jump back to 1999 shall we?
It's not a jump back, it's sticking with the more enterprise solution. Agentless is limited in scope and requires support at the hypervisor, OS, and application level. Essentially no enterprise shop can use it, as there is no agentless system that supports the range of apps that shops use. So no enterprise has moved to agentless. Many use it as an "extra" piece, making backups more complex and more expensive, rather than less.
Really, for the time being, agentless is mostly just marketing hype. So jumping to "tried and true" rather than "sounds impressive and is rarely thought through" is exactly what we should want.
My biggest concerns w/ agent based are:
- A nas IS cheap don't bore too much about space. Just backup.
- is there a cheap solution with centraluzed management of backups? Cross platform?
Any hints?!
-
RE: Issue with python2-tornado-5.0.2 and Salt
What is the need
For tornado? Python has virtualenv in case. You can run an "isolated" version of tornado for your app leaving the system wide version for salt -
RE: I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?
@pete-s said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
@jaredbusch said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
How is it a huge gotcha when most business have an AD infrastructure anyway?
How about when you want to virtualize the AD?
You virtualize it and then join the hypervisor. Sort of hyperconverged stuff.
-
RE: I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?
@pete-s said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
@matteo-nunziati said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
Xen still crippled until xcp-ng will be declared stable by the community.
How could xcp-ng not be stable when it's the same source code as xenserver 7.4?
That makes no sense.They patch the source of a number of xenserver components. Btw my fault it is not xen per se it is xenserver. No one in smb uses xen outside of xenserver+xoa
-
RE: I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?
My 2 cents.
Vmware too expensive if you do not run 15k€ stuff. Still over 15k€ has budget impact.KVM no agentless backup a la altaro/veeam.
Xen still crippled until xcp-ng will be declared stable by the community.
Would you like freebsd/netbsd/openbsd virtualization? Good luck.
Hyperv simply satisfies my requirements.
Matter of tastes it is really commodity. Like Dell vs HPE.
-
RE: I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?
@momurda thats the only benefit if you are in vendor backup. I am. While I really like kvm I would not recommend it to the average italian sysadmin who unfortunately ignores linux.
-
RE: I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?
@bnrstnr said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
@obsolesce said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
It's very simple to set up in a properly configured AD environment. You basically just install it, join it to the domain, configure it remotely. It just works. (so long as your AD environment is set up correctly)
This is the huge gotcha. The fact that it has to be domain joined to easily manage it is silly, IMO. Other hypervisors don't require this at all. Other hypervisors just work without this step.
@obsolesce said in I think I am missing something about Hyper-V....?:
Also, it's the most compatible solution for Windows-world stuff.
What specifically makes it more compatible than other hypervisors? I've run windows on several hypervisors and can't tell any difference.
I've easily deployed it without AD
-
RE: salt-master: error: Failed to load configuration: Cannot load native module 'Cryptodome.Cipher._raw_des'
You seem to miss some encryption libs...