I was dealing with a new customer with that error recently that accidentally had included their old backup solution's folders in the Unitrends backup, resulting in a backup that was a few TB larger than the appliance capacity... thus the no space error.

@Minion-Queen said:

But I have a hard time keeping a train of thought when I can't use my hands!

I thought you were busy right now. Why are you posting?!?

@IRJ said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@IRJ said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@IRJ said:

I believe everyone is at fault here, the son, the father, and AT&T. Everyone already mentioned why the father and son our at fault, but AT&T should have proactive monitors that send out redflags once a data bill hits a certain threshold. Especially if the family's typical phone bill is $150 and all the sudden is $2000. That should send a redflag somewhere and something should be done to ensure the customer really wants to accept the outrageous data charges.

But they did, right?

a single text message

how much hounding does one need. The message was sent and received and they didn't care. I don't see how AT&T has any more responsibility here. They have the status on the phone itself, they have an account status AND a courtesy, but unnecessary, text alert that they were being foolish. How many layers must AT&T do?

I would think an alert at every GB over the limit would be appreciated by customers.

I would think that anyone who cared about their bill would be watching their usage after seeing that warning. Once again, not AT&T's fault. Everyone needs to stop being a victim and take some personal responsibility. For AT&T to send any notification at all is a courtesy to the customer. You know what your terms of service are. You know what the cost is if you go above the limit. That's not their problem. They offer the service and you pay them for what you use. That's where it ends. If you can't be bothered to pay attention and monitor your own use of the service that you alone are responsible to pay for, why is it their job to be your babysitter?

OK, got it... but stop calling it an IOP. It's an Input/Output, not an Input/output Per. (sorry :P)

...and I just caught up with the new notifications coming in

@MattSpeller I'm glad you don't feel too bad about it. Maybe next time...

I didn't read the rest of this post, but when did you get a small rack?

Well, in NY, they are talking on their cell phones and doing 20mph over the speed limit. But don't you forget to count to "3-Mississippi" at a stop sign. Don't get me started.

@MattSpeller said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@MattSpeller said:

If you compare the two on snow, FWD is just better.

How? It has less control, it is dramatically more dangerous.

You're just 100% incorrect. The weight of the engine and trans sitting right on the wheel gives traction. You can start, you can stop. Much more safe than RWD.

That's why anyone with a lick of sense puts weight in the back of their RWD for the winter...

Here's the first article to refer to, although I am sure you already looked at it.

http://support.unitrends.com/ikm/questions.php?questionid=781

Dang she's short.

@DustinB3403 said in Cambridge Proves FBI Lied About Needing iPhone Backdoor:

@art_of_shred The erosion of freedoms here isn't what happened though. Poor programming methods, and a lack of physical control to the device allowed the phone to be hacked.

Sure the government is always attempting to find more ways to monitor more, but the matter of the discussion is that not having physical security of the device allows as many attempts as desired to crack security.

It's bruteforce 101. Physical access wins eventually..

I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm stating that while it's obvious that the backdoor wasn't required, the FBI pushed for it anyway. That's not an argument against what you're pointing out. It's an argument that the government uses opportunities like this to push against the public for broader power, to see if they can get it. If you think they did it solely for that investigation, that's a dangerously myopic view.

IOOP... Aye-Oop!

@Dominica said:

@art_of_shred said:

Dang she's short.

That's EXACTLY what I was thinking! Her head is barely in frame!

Good thing it wasn't you in that pic... just couldn't resist!

Just a tad behind the curve, eh?

Thanks, Matt!

I was going to say something about a picture of a small rack, but I digress.

@Minion-Queen said in 3D Printed House:

Youtube Video

Uh oh, now the queen wants a castle...

Yeah, I'm not allowed to say anything. She gets all cranky on me, so you go ahead and enjoy.

@thecreativeone91 said:

Trying to explain to someone that Wifi Channels and interference is an issue still today, while he refuses to believe and says that's not an issue with G very much and not at all with N. It was apparently mainly an issue with B... FAIL!

My guitar wireless kills all the wifi in the house when I use it. Of course, it has to be 2.4GHz. What a nuisance.