License Compliance Software/tools
-
With virtual PCs, make sure that you're also covering yourself for Windows with those virtual OSEs.
-
So they don't have to have the software installed, I just have to license the product to their device. Does that mean I have to change my RDS to devices instead of users? Also how do I prevent other users from accessing the software?
-
The licenses are not tied to RDS licenses. No need to change anything there.
And yes, it is just a license, not an install for the device doing the accessing.
-
@technobabble said:
Also how do I prevent other users from accessing the software?
You can set permissions on the folders so only certain users can open them, but that doesn't change the licensing.. if the aforementioned thin clients, etc access the server, even if the user does not have rights to launch the program, they still require a license.
-
Perfect! Thanks to all that participated, I really appreciate it!
-
@technobabble Office 2010 can quite happily be installed on a server for RDS/Terminal Server access. Done it loads of times.
Licensing is as previously mentioned. If you have 60 people with access to the server, that's 60 licenses.
-
After rereading everyones post, I understand that an Office license is needed per user of server. Paying for the 20 users is cool, paying for the other 40 because they have to login to the same server to use a different product seems crazy.
If that's the way the licensing works, I would have to build another RDP server just for Office so those 20 users can use office. Any reason that won't work?
-
@technobabble said:
After rereading everyones post, I understand that an Office license is needed per user of server. Paying for the 20 users is cool, paying for the other 40 because they have to login to the same server to use a different product seems crazy.
If that's the way the licensing works, I would have to build another RDP server just for Office so those 20 users can use office. Any reason that won't work?
Yes, I think that that might be how you handle it.
-
@technobabble said:
After rereading everyones post, I understand that an Office license is needed per user of server. Paying for the 20 users is cool, paying for the other 40 because they have to login to the same server to use a different product seems crazy.
If that's the way the licensing works, I would have to build another RDP server just for Office so those 20 users can use office. Any reason that won't work?
That would do the trick. make sure to lock RDS permissions down on the original server once complete.
-
What we see companies do, simply from an ease of management and licensing, is to put users on a ProPlus subscription or E3 from Office 365. That way, everyone's covered regardless of what they do. It may not be the least hard cost method, but there's no concern over compliance anymore.
-
ProPlus looks quite affordable especially since they are using Word/Excel and don't need email.(Yes they have tried Open Office and had formatting and other Excel issues)
-
Since my company provides support for this client am I liable for the unlicensed software on the server?
-
@technobabble said:
Since my company provides support for this client am I liable for the unlicensed software on the server?
I guess that would depend... did you (your company) install it? If they did and didn't ensure the proper licensing, it's possible you could be brought to court at the very least.
-
@technobabble said:
Since my company provides support for this client am I liable for the unlicensed software on the server?
Providing support does not make you responsible. It is the party violating the license who is liable. That could be you, but being the service provider doesn't make that you.
-
@Dashrender said:
@technobabble said:
Since my company provides support for this client am I liable for the unlicensed software on the server?
I guess that would depend... did you (your company) install it? If they did and didn't ensure the proper licensing, it's possible you could be brought to court at the very least.
I'm not aware of any legal need to check on other's licensing. The licensing is not in his control and it is not his responsibility to enforce it.
-
That would go for CALs. The RDS server itself is different. Maybe if that was not licensed. But even then, all he can do is trust the company to have the licenses.
-
That's why I'm saying they could be drug to court... but it would be pretty difficult for either side to prove anything unless there are recorded conversations (voice or email) and basically shows you are telling the client they don't need to purchase, then you're in trouble.
