Fanless Security DVR... anybody got a favorite
-
still hunting to no avail. just bumping this to see if any new members have any products in mind.
-
No DVR experience here, I'm afraid. You could always build one.
-
Only ones I saw at the show that were really fanless were mobile DVRs but none were IP.
Plenty like everfocus, honeywell but had quite a few moving parts (Fans). Most were saying locate the DVR somewhere less dirty... Or use a filtered housing...
Brickcom had some new camera 1mp pinhole and their NVR is PC based so you could build your own.
Pretty much could Build your own for anything.
Would look really similar to a fanless home theater PC. (htpc). -
I'm not sure how much floor space you have to work with, but you could use a rack-mounted unit inside of a harsh environment rack. The rack has all the filters and such, allowing for regular equipment.
-
found this, gonna give it a shot.
http://www.dx.com/p/mini-8-ch-dvr-degital-video-recorder-home-surveillance-security-d1-resolution-h-264-hdd-support-289024#.U1O0rFdZi_k -
@Hubtech I hope it works for you and hopefully you will have time write up a review of the product for the Mangoladdies and Mangolassies!
-
We are using DVR CCTV
https://www.q-see.com/
As 3 years of using this in our office, its a good quality of camera.I never encountered any problem. -
i've used qsee before, but I was looking for a fanless DVR for a nasty environment. Lots of flower and fryer grease in the air.
-
@Hubtech said:
i've used qsee before, but I was looking for a fanless DVR for a nasty environment. Lots of flower and fryer grease in the air.
have you look at this .
http://www.smartcctvltd.com/we are also using this. but i am not sure if it will fit to your needs
-
@Joyfano Not a fan of qsee / lorex brands..
they work - but are pretty cheap...
the remote viewing can be a pain with the applications... have setup countless of these and they work - but reviewing recordings isn't as reliable smooth as it could be...that said many have this issue in that price range... qsee/lorex are both pretty "Cost Effective"