Move ESXi VM and keep MAC address
-
Thanks for that
I'll have a go at that when I can shut the server down again -
Did you forget to account for the MAC address problem when setting up the VM?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Did you forget to account for the MAC address problem when setting up the VM?
Well, no. I didn't set up the VM and I didn't know about the MAC address problem.
Also, I'm not entirely sure which MAC address problem you are referring to... the one in @thecreativeone91's link or a different one? -
If you want mobile MAC addresses, there is a way to set that up from the beginning. If you use dynamic ones it becomes much more complicated.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
If you want mobile MAC addresses, there is a way to set that up from the beginning. If you use dynamic ones it becomes much more complicated.
Yep, I'd forgotten that. Hopefully, I'll remember that for future VM's
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Did you forget to account for the MAC address problem when setting up the VM?
I don't know about you, but how often do you learn about the fact that a machine ties it's licensing to a MAC until you try to move said license?
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Did you forget to account for the MAC address problem when setting up the VM?
I don't know about you, but how often do you learn about the fact that a machine ties it's licensing to a MAC until you try to move said license?
Hard to say, can't think of any modern product that we'd be willing to use that would do that. But in theory, you generally know that ahead of time. I'm not sure I've ever heard of someone being caught unaware that the MAC address was the licensing.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Did you forget to account for the MAC address problem when setting up the VM?
I don't know about you, but how often do you learn about the fact that a machine ties it's licensing to a MAC until you try to move said license?
Hard to say, can't think of any modern product that we'd be willing to use that would do that. But in theory, you generally know that ahead of time. I'm not sure I've ever heard of someone being caught unaware that the MAC address was the licensing.
Well I guess you can count me in that list. I've walked into several shops trying to do a migration not knowing that. Granted it doesn't happen much anymore, but it does on a scanner software I currently employ, luckily a call to their support desk to reset the license and it locks in on the new MAC upon first use.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Did you forget to account for the MAC address problem when setting up the VM?
I don't know about you, but how often do you learn about the fact that a machine ties it's licensing to a MAC until you try to move said license?
Hard to say, can't think of any modern product that we'd be willing to use that would do that. But in theory, you generally know that ahead of time. I'm not sure I've ever heard of someone being caught unaware that the MAC address was the licensing.
Well I guess you can count me in that list. I've walked into several shops trying to do a migration not knowing that. Granted it doesn't happen much anymore, but it does on a scanner software I currently employ, luckily a call to their support desk to reset the license and it locks in on the new MAC upon first use.
You can count me in on this list as well. Both of the large CAD developers tie their licensing server to a specific MAC address. The good news is that Hyper-V allows you to assign whatever MAC address you want...so that solved that issue.
-
@Dashrender said:
Well I guess you can count me in that list. I've walked into several shops trying to do a migration not knowing that.
That's after the fact. We are talking about at deployment time. Migrating something is too late. Did the person installing the application not know?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Well I guess you can count me in that list. I've walked into several shops trying to do a migration not knowing that.
That's after the fact. We are talking about at deployment time. Migrating something is too late. Did the person installing the application not know?
Nope they did not, nor did I when I installed the above listed Scanning software. It wasn't until I tried to move the scanner (and software) to another computer and it told me I was out of licenses. Call to the support desk is how I learned it was tied to the MAC.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Well I guess you can count me in that list. I've walked into several shops trying to do a migration not knowing that.
That's after the fact. We are talking about at deployment time. Migrating something is too late. Did the person installing the application not know?
Nope they did not, nor did I when I installed the above listed Scanning software. It wasn't until I tried to move the scanner (and software) to another computer and it told me I was out of licenses. Call to the support desk is how I learned it was tied to the MAC.
That's REALLY weird. It was a secret licensing that no one was informed about?
-
I've always known that when installing. It's part of the planning. A lot of the server side apps for fire, rescue and engineering that have floating licenses client side use the mac to tie in activation on the server side.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
That's REALLY weird. It was a secret licensing that no one was informed about?
How licensing works rarely if ever comes up. The end user/installer gets a install file and an installation Key, you install and away you go. I'll admit, I rarely read EULAs, so if it was listed in there that it was tied to the MAC I wouldn't know about it until after the fact.
Our scanner solution definitely didn't spell out the fact that it was tieing it's use to the MAC. And I've installed AutoCAD server before and don't recall it saying that it tied to the MAC either.
Are you saying that either a) you are expressly told in the software you typically deal with, or b) you expressly inquire so you know how it works?
What lead you to asking in the first place?
-
@Dashrender said:
And I've installed AutoCAD server before and don't recall it saying that it tied to the MAC either.
AutoDesk specifically tells you this when you ask about licensing.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Dashrender said:
And I've installed AutoCAD server before and don't recall it saying that it tied to the MAC either.
AutoDesk specifically tells you this when you ask about licensing.
when you ask? meaning you are talking to a person? the last time I installed Autodesk was 15 years ago.. so it could be completely different today.
-
@Dashrender said:
Are you saying that either a) you are expressly told in the software you typically deal with, or b) you expressly inquire so you know how it works?
I feel like the software selection process has somehow always enabled us to avoid these kinds of products. A trial, for example, would normally tell you or reviews. I can't imagine quality software that would work this way. Hard to believe that there weren't warning signs.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Are you saying that either a) you are expressly told in the software you typically deal with, or b) you expressly inquire so you know how it works?
I feel like the software selection process has somehow always enabled us to avoid these kinds of products. A trial, for example, would normally tell you or reviews. I can't imagine quality software that would work this way. Hard to believe that there weren't warning signs.
You can't really avoid solidworks & AutoDesk both with engineering
-
Everyone gets caught by weird licensing sometime. But nearly always I found that it is from a time when IT decision making was bypassed. Never seen IT get caught by this, only IT get stuck cleaning it up. I've seen IT have things like this, but they knew about it before installing.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Are you saying that either a) you are expressly told in the software you typically deal with, or b) you expressly inquire so you know how it works?
I feel like the software selection process has somehow always enabled us to avoid these kinds of products. A trial, for example, would normally tell you or reviews. I can't imagine quality software that would work this way. Hard to believe that there weren't warning signs.
You can't really avoid solidworks & AutoDesk both with engineering
True. But I think people tend to be aware of how the licensing works with those. How often do you see those catching people "by surprise" after install time?
