CloudatCost OpenDNS Issue
-
And given that they run VMware, I'm pretty sure they are load balancing.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@Aaron-Studer said:
I would never trust that DC again. Time to rebuild.
It's secured with Webroot. Also, there's been no indication of an attack. I'm not decomming it without a good reason.
It's not like he'll have it for long anyway. He doesn't have a datacenter license for every CPU in the cloud so he can't run anything but a demo license that expires in 90 days there.
Not sure what you're talking about. My key is fully activated.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
At least you don't have any open SMB shares.
Nope, this is a straight DC.
-
-
See?
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@Aaron-Studer said:
I would never trust that DC again. Time to rebuild.
It's secured with Webroot. Also, there's been no indication of an attack. I'm not decomming it without a good reason.
It's not like he'll have it for long anyway. He doesn't have a datacenter license for every CPU in the cloud so he can't run anything but a demo license that expires in 90 days there.
Not sure what you're talking about. My key is fully activated.
Just because it is activated doesn't mean that it meets the licensing terms. Either way I'm not sure one way or the other about the Microsoft licensing in this scenario, it is above and beyond what I have an understanding of.
-
-
@coliver said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@Aaron-Studer said:
I would never trust that DC again. Time to rebuild.
It's secured with Webroot. Also, there's been no indication of an attack. I'm not decomming it without a good reason.
It's not like he'll have it for long anyway. He doesn't have a datacenter license for every CPU in the cloud so he can't run anything but a demo license that expires in 90 days there.
Not sure what you're talking about. My key is fully activated.
Just because it is activated doesn't mean that it meets the licensing terms. Either way I'm not sure one way or the other about the Microsoft licensing in this scenario, it is above and beyond what I have an understanding of.
I can activate Volume licenses copies of MS office on many computers.. Doesn't mean I'm legally allowed too.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
Not sure what you're talking about. My key is fully activated.
We are talking about having a valid license, which you do not.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
See?
I only see you posting something unrelated that suggests you are not aware of how to license a server.
-
Have you every experienced an Audit?? Maybe you wouldn't abuse software rights so much if you had.
-
@coliver said:
Just because it is activated doesn't mean that it meets the licensing terms. Either way I'm not sure one way or the other about the Microsoft licensing in this scenario, it is above and beyond what I have an understanding of.
You can think of it the same as having the scenario in house. That it is hosted isn't really a factor. You need the same info and licensing you would need if this was a private cloud.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
Just because it is activated doesn't mean that it meets the licensing terms. Either way I'm not sure one way or the other about the Microsoft licensing in this scenario, it is above and beyond what I have an understanding of.
You can think of it the same as having the scenario in house. That it is hosted isn't really a factor. You need the same info and licensing you would need if this was a private cloud.
So you need to know the underlying hardware before you can make any licensing decisions in the public cloud?
-
@coliver said:
So you need to know the underlying hardware before you can make any licensing decisions in the public cloud?
FTFY: So you need to know the underlying hardware before you can make any licensing decisions
That it is public cloud has no bearing. Windows licensing requires you to know the hardware details. Plain and simple. That's how they license. This is no different than any Windows licensing, ever. It's just that when you do it in house, you know these details and don't think about how impossible it would be if they were hidden from you.
-
It's a student copy that I got about 3 years ago. My understanding was the key was for life but only allowed to be used for educational purposes and not business purposes, which this falls under.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
It's a student copy that I got about 3 years ago. My understanding was the key was for life but only allowed to be used for educational purposes and not business purposes, which this falls under.
Is that a DreamSpark key? If it is then it is only valid for the duration that you are in college... I asked a Microsoft Licensing person that when I graduated from undergrad. Either way, from what @scottalanmiller is saying licensing for the public cloud is generally implausible since you don't know the underlying hardware.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
It's a student copy that I got about 3 years ago. My understanding was the key was for life but only allowed to be used for educational purposes and not business purposes, which this falls under.
That part seems fine, but irrelevant to the situation. You keep providing information that doesn't line up with the licensing concerns listed.
-
@coliver said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
It's a student copy that I got about 3 years ago. My understanding was the key was for life but only allowed to be used for educational purposes and not business purposes, which this falls under.
Is that a DreamSpark key? If it is then it is only valid for the duration that you are in college... I asked a Microsoft Licensing person that when I graduated from undergrad. Either way, from what @scottalanmiller is saying licensing for the public cloud is generally implausible since you don't know the underlying hardware.
It is Dreamspark but that isn't how it was explained to me at the time.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
It is Dreamspark but that isn't how it was explained to me at the time.
Again, that's fine but not related to the situation.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
It is Dreamspark but that isn't how it was explained to me at the time.
Again, that's fine but not related to the situation.
Anyways, if Microsoft wants to come yell at me for it, I'll let them. Until then, it's staying as is.
