Comparing a Small Server and a Printer
-
@JaredBusch said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
Absolutely not. An AIO has a printer, but also a scanner (with scan to USB, email, or folder), and fax.
To customers, it's printer 100% of the time.
-
@JaredBusch said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
A printer - sure, you're right - but who deploys printers anymore?
Um, everyone. We have a full time printer guy because we do like a dozen a day.
So AIO to you, is "printer" to the whole world.
Absolutely not. An AIO has a printer, but also a scanner (with scan to USB, email, or folder), and fax.
A printer is a printer only. I deploy both all of the time.
See - I very specifically called out AIOs over printers to prevent the opposite from happening to me.. OHHHH you're talking about AIOs.. and I was talking about print only devices.. lol instead I now got it this way - AIO/printer - same difference
LOL
-
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@JaredBusch said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
A printer - sure, you're right - but who deploys printers anymore?
Um, everyone. We have a full time printer guy because we do like a dozen a day.
So AIO to you, is "printer" to the whole world.
Absolutely not. An AIO has a printer, but also a scanner (with scan to USB, email, or folder), and fax.
A printer is a printer only. I deploy both all of the time.
See - I very specifically called out AIOs over printers to prevent the opposite from happening to me.. OHHHH you're talking about AIOs.. and I was talking about print only devices.. lol instead I now got it this way - AIO/printer - same difference
LOL
Really what they all are is copiers. At some point, they started removing the scanning from copiers, then they put it back. AIOs if anything are "copiers" to anyone older than a Gen Zer. We had fax, scan, print, etc. from copiers for a really long time before the trending new "AIO" term came about.
But since you could print to the copiers, they were called printers, too. Smaller printers didn't have scanners. But now, most do.
But for purposes of this discussion, AIO doesn't matter. We are still talking tiny devices.
-
Whether scanning, faxing or printing... printers are primarily bound by their mechanical components. There isn't much processing that goes on in those things. Some, for sure, but relatively little.
Faxing, especially, was traditionally done even without a CPU, for a CPU to be a bottleneck on a fax would be pretty weird.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
Faxing, especially, was traditionally done even without a CPU, for a CPU to be a bottleneck on a fax would be pretty weird.
Memory more than CPU in a few cases I've dealt with, someone sent 100's of pages (probably intentionally) to our fax which tied it up.
But restarting the thing resolved it.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@JaredBusch said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@scottalanmiller said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
A printer - sure, you're right - but who deploys printers anymore?
Um, everyone. We have a full time printer guy because we do like a dozen a day.
So AIO to you, is "printer" to the whole world.
Absolutely not. An AIO has a printer, but also a scanner (with scan to USB, email, or folder), and fax.
A printer is a printer only. I deploy both all of the time.
See - I very specifically called out AIOs over printers to prevent the opposite from happening to me.. OHHHH you're talking about AIOs.. and I was talking about print only devices.. lol instead I now got it this way - AIO/printer - same difference
LOL
Really what they all are is copiers. At some point, they started removing the scanning from copiers, then they put it back. AIOs if anything are "copiers" to anyone older than a Gen Zer. We had fax, scan, print, etc. from copiers for a really long time before the trending new "AIO" term came about.
But since you could print to the copiers, they were called printers, too. Smaller printers didn't have scanners. But now, most do.
But for purposes of this discussion, AIO doesn't matter. We are still talking tiny devices.
I do agree with the point that normal people call all those things printers these days, rarely will you find someone to call it anything else.
But - waiting at my devices when using the control panel at the device is still very much a thing - because they are bloody slow, the displays respond slowly, etc. They use the old style of touch sensing, which unlike modern phones frequently misses touches, etc. I'd be happy to add $50 onto my $7K AIO to have it run 100% (though likely much more) faster. Yeah $50 on a $350 desktop model is a lot to add... but knowing what I have now compared to a machine that's $50 more, over the life of 5 years.. yeah, it would be worth it to spend it even on a $350 device.
-
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
They use the old style of touch sensing, which unlike modern phones frequently misses touches, etc.
Agreed, but that's not CPU, that's interface hardware. Different issue.
-
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
I'd be happy to add $50 onto my $7K AIO to have it run 100% (though likely much more) faster. Yeah $50 on a $350 desktop model is a lot to add... but knowing what I have now compared to a machine that's $50 more, over the life of 5 years.. yeah, it would be worth it to spend it even on a $350 device.
Agreed, but you aren't talking about the same thing that we are discussing here. The interface can go as fast as you can type or see from a 8088 or Z80 processor. That's not CPU or RAM related. So while your final point, of wanting a faster input device, is completely valid, it's also not related to the context of this discussion or the one that spawned it (surprised that printers don't have AD services baked in.)
This is like stating that you wish the computer in your car was more powerful because it takes so long to drive places. While the computer in your car is important, it's not really a factor in how fast your car can go.
-
The waiting for a response on those LCDs and on the web interface I'm assuming are CPU/RAM bound.
-
@Dashrender said in Comparing a Small Server and a Printer:
The waiting for a response on those LCDs and on the web interface I'm assuming are CPU/RAM bound.
Web, maybe. LCD very unlikely. Can't be RAM bound, if that was a case you'd need swap space but printers don't have hard drives and swap space. So RAM is either enough or not enough, not fast or slow like a desktop.
CPU is possible, but displaying an LCD screen at full speed is trivial for a 486 or an M68000. So it's safe to assume that that is no the case. Web? Possible. But does the web interface impact using the product?
