ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Contabo VPS

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    6 Posts 2 Posters 711 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Alex Sage
      last edited by

      https://contabo.com/?show=vps

      Very Interesting Offering...

      How are they keeping prices so low?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Always a good question. Let's run some numbers and see...

        Entry level server (often the hardest to make money on) is $7.38/mo. They are using KVM so no surprises here. Let's look at a server with, say, 128GB of RAM which would probably be common. That will give us 21 VMs on it at 6GB each. RAM is the real bottleneck as it cannot be reasonable oversold like CPU or storage. Nor can it be deduped in a reliable way. So RAM is generally our capacity gauge on a VPS.

        At 21 that is $155/mo in revenue for a single physical host. As Tier IV colocation can house a server like this for $50/mo that would give us $105/mo to cover the hardware and support. Realistically a VPS provider may not be in a Tier IV and certainly is not buying their space by the U but is buying it by the rack or larger or building out their own. So really, we'd expect the cost for this to be closer to $20 - $30/mo, so there is a lot of profit room in there, and I've seen places doing it for closer to $10, but none that we'd considered viable.

        So even assuming $105/mo that is $1260/yr per host. A 128GB whitebox server for this workload might easily be under $3,000. Over five years, that would imply $3,300 for labour and any replacement parts needed for the unit. If the unit is stretched to six years (not very likely) the profits would likely increase significantly. Since the labour is nearly all in the racking and this is assumed to be done at volume, clearly this is not creating any millionaires overnight. But the cost is not impossible to see turning a profit.

        If they can get the servers to higher densities, say 256GB of RAM for $4,000, which is very reasonable, you can extrapolate the vastly higher profit potential. Running that number again, that would be 42 VMs per server for $11,600 total revenue over five years with the same monthly costs and labor. Much easier to see that labour could be covered during that time.

        In reality, a VPS provider is likely using boxes with 512GB or more. Even if the boxes are a little more costly, the labour reduction offset is likely well worth it.

        A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • A
          Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller Do you know how well nested KVM works?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller Did you see this? https://contabo.com/?show=colocation

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
              last edited by

              @aaronstuder said in Contabo VPS:

              @scottalanmiller Did you see this? https://contabo.com/?show=colocation

              Nice, wish that I had a quick guide to how much power is needed for different scenarios.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                last edited by

                @aaronstuder said in Contabo VPS:

                @scottalanmiller Do you know how well nested KVM works?

                Have not tested it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post