What does your desk look like?
-
@tonyshowoff said:
I used to use mostly plain text editors, I didn't even like highlighting before I started using PhpStorm. After I got into the groove it's pretty crazy how much time I save and I don't have to take the same sort of short cuts which lead to bad practices/breaking standards.
Like your big long post, this just reinforces to me that you don't really know what you're talking about, and have no idea what Sublime can actually do.
I actually had to remap a few of the preset short cut keys as well, some of the more useful features had some of the most obscure ones, but they're easy to change in the settings.
Right, so it's a struggle that you have to bandaid to serve its purpose, :D. Just moderni"s"e dude, find a legit IDE like Sublime Text
-
@tonyshowoff said:
Well, yes, I mean having to defend the use of an IDE is sort of unusual and I can only presume that someone who needed justification for standardised and IDE enforced code organisation hadn't dealt with a large project.
By almost all definitions Sublime Text, when writing code for the WEB, qualifies as an IDE. The only real deficit someone that was less-informed could argue is that it doesn't have integrated debugging but guess what? You wouldn't want it to. The debugging of cutting edge web apps is actually best done, you guessed it, on the clients they run on: Web browsers ( and their heavily-integrated debugging toolsets, this is extremely important because different things happen in different browsers ). So in my opinion it's the perfect IDE, functionally at least.
And you edit that only in Sublime Text know what ever file does, and where every class is, etc?
Yes. Unlike some other options ( PHP ), with ColdFusion you don't have to hunt down, scavenger through a ton of libraries and third party classes and plug them into your app, it can do a gigantor quantity of those things out of the box, because they're architected into the product itself and dead simple to utilize.
That's part of it, yes. But the organisation is important because it helps with refactoring, naming, maintenance, etc. Your perspective seems to be based on much smaller projects, even if you seem to be dealing with an obscenely large one. Our ERP is up to about 2 million lines and it's only 4,500 files, including HTML templates.
Just flat out inaccurate. "The organization" is something that you determine as an author or team, independent of any IDE or editor. You can and will achieve an IDENTICAL CODE ORGANIZATION whether in Sublime or Web Storm because ultimately you decide how to organize each code asset and what to name it. This is a silly argument because you keep misusing "organization" to mean "navigation".
I doubt that, I can ctrl + click any class or anything and find it's origin, or right click and find all usages of it anywhere, and the context, or do the same with alt + b if I don't want to leave my keyboard, and since all the code is indexed, it barely takes a second despite 2 million lines of code in this ERP.
Yeah, and in the time it takes you to execute your mouse travel to the spot you have to click on I've already fired up the file I want with the keyboard, so if that's your primary mode of code navigation then I probably navigate substantially faster than you depending on where your mouse cursor was at any point in time. The laundry list of competitive advantages of using Sublime over your favorite "IDE" are stacking up pretty quickly here
I never said it wasn't a great editor, I said it was better than Notepad++ earlier.
My point was you're trying to polarize Sublime and WebStorm based on the classification of editor versus IDE, but functionally they do almost all of the same things, and from your comments it just sounds like you don't comprehend that, and see it as some kind of simple text editor that colorizes your code, which is wildly misinformed.
This is from the perspective of someone who hasn't worked on a team with probably more than two people and really doesn't know what a large project is, at least that's my perception. This is sort of silly, honestly, the idea you could know hundreds or thousands of classes, especially if you work on multiple large projects. Not only that, why spend the extra effort to do that in the first place if you don't have to?
I've worked on a team of 7, but you'll rarely find a ColdFusion team bigger than 4 or so because of how productive it makes you. 1 highly-skilled and experienced CF developer can often do the work of multiple highly-skilled and experienced PHP developers, that's just a byproduct of the nature of the language, its feature set, and the methodologies and workflows necessary to achieve identical end results with each option. I'm sorry you had to find out like this.
IRL enterprise doesn't work this way, sorry, it just doesn't, and it can't, otherwise large projects would never get done if everyone on the team had to create a special bond with all of the code. Personal projects that does happen though.
It can and does, depending on the diversity of experience and skill within any given team, and the cumulative need of any given team to rely on 3rd party code and libraries, and the nature of the team's management and coordination, best practice enforcement, and a host of other factors. It sounds like large-scale PHP products are a lot more convoluted and unwieldy ( Java ones definitely are, but I didn't imagine the problem being as extreme w/ PHP, sounds like it is ), which in turn makes relying on some of the code-navigation features of a tool like JetBrains' a necessary evil. With 3rd party ColdFusion resources, you're not having to hop in and work with internal classes, you throw the library into your project, and work with it like a black box, using its documentation as an instruction manual and leveraging its formal functionality according to plan instead of sogging through the swamp of its internals manually, which is the experience you semi-describe in your stories about code navigation ( referred to as "code organization" in your posts ). In summary, the better the synchronicity and coordination of any given team the less necessary stuff like you're referring to will be, and the less difficult it'll be to find what you're looking for even in large projects.
You seem to believe that structure and names are meaningless beyond what you feel like
Ok, you're definitely miscomprehending my posts, that's the exact opposite of what I said. Structure and naming are EVERYTHING and are what, when done correctly and with uniform and standardized convention, can TOTALLY EXEMPT YOU from the having to rely on your IDE indexing and babysitting your finding of where any given chunk of code originates from. So no, it's not "what you feel like", it's "what is a solid naming and structural strategy that'll let me know where any given piece of code I may need to work with or edit is at any given time. I promise, once you learn about and adopt proper conventions it'll make your projects so, so much quicker to author and not to mention maintain. You can thank me later
It's just sort of weird to defend using an IDE and have it called training wheels, that's certainly not a professional perspective on development, and is basically out of line with probably much of the professional programming world; especially in team environments.
Again mischaracterizing my posts. I was asking you what you personally felt like your chosen IDE offered you over what I stated was my preferred code authoring platform, Sublime. I didn't say "why are IDEs, generally speaking, better for certain types of coding tasks than basic text editors" ( even though Sublime Text isn't one ), which is how it seems like you keep trying to paint my question. The training wheels comment was SPECIFICALLY ABOUT RELYING ON YOUR CHOSEN IDE'S ABILITY TO LET YOU NAVIGATE TO OTHER FILES BY CLICKING SMALL NODES OF CODE IN A CURRENT FILE. Please read the posts again if you still disagree.
You can probably create a short cut for that, you can for damn near everything else. I suggest using it longer than a day, the problem is it takes time to really understand how to use it properly to get everything out of it, because you can approach it like a regular text editor and get no benefits at all; I've seen this happen.
Maybe so, but at this point, because I'm already at a point where my team's projects adhere to well-enforced conventions and best practices, I don't find myself struggling in a pool of code to figure out where some cryptic function or class came from, and you, as an experienced champion of your favorite IDE, still haven't really listed one compelling reason to use it over Sublime, at least for people that aren't working on big, klugdy, PHP monsters.
That's really weird, my specs are almost the same and I don't experience that sort of latency. Sometimes on larger files, first view, there's a lag as it renders in the background, but that's substantially large files, and that's why the single responsibility principle is your friend.
I bet you're seeing it you just aren't as sensitive to it as I am. It's not huge it's just perceptible. With Sublime, within 30 milliseconds of your second click to open a file it's colorized with an active cursor. In WebStorm, you've got at least a few hundred milliseconds before the file is ready to go. Probably another byproduct of the Java as-an-interface mistake, but who knows. I'm kind of ADD about computers and performance tends to bug me way more than most people, even if not especially other developers. It's not a good or bad thing, just how my brain works.
-
Shouldn't all this programing stuff be split off into a topic in the developer discussions? @Minion-Queen Can this be done?
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
Shouldn't all this programing stuff be split off into a topic in the developer discussions? @Minion-Queen Can this be done?
Don't worry, I think it's pretty much over. 
-
No "splitting" functionality, yet. Hopefully the developers of NodeBB take note.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
No "splitting" functionality, yet. Hopefully the developers of NodeBB take note.
NodeBB is clearly a clone of Discourse, I figured it'd be on their to do list sin ce Discourse allows that.
-
Found a pic of my previous desk setup! It's a NextDesk automated sit/stand Terra ( later converted into an Air ).
Before:
After:
-
@creayt said:
Found a pic of my previous setup! NextDesk Terra ( later converted into an Air ).
That's entirely to clean.....I wouldn't want to touch it.
-
My desk is still a mess, I need a maid, any volunteers?
-
I suppose this counts as part of my desk too, even though it's in a closet.
-
@BMarie said:
My desk is still a mess, I need a maid, any volunteers?
I suggest the use of the off site bulk archiving solution that your company utilises.
At most work places that I've seen, they (the archiving company) are kind enough to provide a large archiving receptacle to allow for several desks worth of stuff.
Ā
The really cool thing is that you just grab the stuff that needs archiving and drop it in. Some archiving places will sort it, others will just toss it all in together.
Ā
If you are unsure of what the bulk archiving receptacle looks like, here is an example:
-
-
@creayt The RAID card that was the original T110 couldn't rebuild RAIDs if you can believe it, you could setup a RAID 1 and if a disk failed it was basically a warning to transfer everything and start all over. I don't know if this is true in what you have, but I'd certainly look into it to be sure, they didn't tell us this when we ordered like 10 of them nor was it apparent even when setting up the RAIDs
-
@tonyshowoff said:
@creayt The RAID card that was the original T110 couldn't rebuild RAIDs if you can believe it, you could setup a RAID 1 and if a disk failed it was basically a warning to transfer everything and start all over. I don't know if this is true in what you have, but I'd certainly look into it to be sure, they didn't tell us this when we ordered like 10 of them nor was it apparent even when setting up the RAIDs
It could rebuild with the original S100 but it was a software based raid really. You had to use Dell Open Manage Server to control it and rebuild the array, which took forever on that card. It was a bad implementation but it could rebuild arrays.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@tonyshowoff said:
@creayt The RAID card that was the original T110 couldn't rebuild RAIDs if you can believe it, you could setup a RAID 1 and if a disk failed it was basically a warning to transfer everything and start all over. I don't know if this is true in what you have, but I'd certainly look into it to be sure, they didn't tell us this when we ordered like 10 of them nor was it apparent even when setting up the RAIDs
It could rebuild with the original S100 but it was a software based raid really. You had to use Dell Open Manage Server to control it and rebuild the array, which took forever on that card. It was a bad implementation but it could rebuild arrays.
Really? Well, we sold them all so no big deal, but yes you're on the money with the exact card.
-
@tonyshowoff @thecreativeone91
Good to know, thanks.
I actually use that box as a local web/app/database server atop a Raid 0 of SSDs, so if it dies it dies anyway.
-
-
I am in Madrid today, right in the heart of things on Gran Via. Nice location.
-
-
Enjoying my espresso....
