ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Unitrends on CloudatCost?

    IT Discussion
    unitrends ueb cloudatcost centos linux
    4
    21
    4.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thanksajdotcomT
      thanksajdotcom @IRJ
      last edited by

      @IRJ said:

      I would not have any type of disaster recovery server on C@C servers at this point. We have seen downtime almost weekly.

      I'm thinking more as a replication source than anything.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thanksajdotcomT
        thanksajdotcom @IRJ
        last edited by

        @IRJ said:

        I would not have any type of disaster recovery server on C@C servers at this point. We have seen downtime almost weekly.

        I definitely agree. Not as a primary backup location!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          Well my first thought is that Unitrends, I believe, only can run on CentOS 5 (hence no Pertino on there yet) and CloudatCost is CentOS 6 and 7 only. So that rules that concept out, I think.

          Pretty sure mine is running CentOS 6.5
          But yeah it's not really possible

          thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • thanksajdotcomT
            thanksajdotcom @A Former User
            last edited by

            @thecreativeone91 said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            Well my first thought is that Unitrends, I believe, only can run on CentOS 5 (hence no Pertino on there yet) and CloudatCost is CentOS 6 and 7 only. So that rules that concept out, I think.

            Pretty sure mine is running CentOS 6.5
            But yeah it's not really possible

            I doubt it. Mine is fully up-to-date and still on CentOS 5.

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              Same here. But it could easily be different generations of installs.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @thanksajdotcom
                last edited by

                @thanksajdotcom said:

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                Well my first thought is that Unitrends, I believe, only can run on CentOS 5 (hence no Pertino on there yet) and CloudatCost is CentOS 6 and 7 only. So that rules that concept out, I think.

                Pretty sure mine is running CentOS 6.5
                But yeah it's not really possible

                I doubt it. Mine is fully up-to-date and still on CentOS 5.

                cat /etc/redhat-release
RecoveryOS release 6.5 (Final)

 uname -a
2.6.32-504.1.3.el6_bp.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 21 16:41:42 EST 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64      GNU/Linux


cat install.log
Installing glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.57rhs-1.el6_5.x86_64
warning: glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.57rhs-1.el6_5.x86_64: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key I     D c105b9de: NOKEY
Installing glusterfs-api-3.4.0.57rhs-1.el6_5.x86_64
Installing libgcc-4.4.7-4.el6.x86_64
Installing setup-2.8.14-20.el6_4.1.noarch
Installing filesystem-2.4.30-3.el6.x86_64
Installing mailcap-2.1.31-2.el6.noarch
Installing basesystem-10.0-4.el6.noarch
Installing ncurses-base-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64

                I didn't list all the install.log but it's definetly. CentOS 6. The Packages even have EL6 and EL6_5 in some of them.

                thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • thanksajdotcomT
                  thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  @thanksajdotcom said:

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  Well my first thought is that Unitrends, I believe, only can run on CentOS 5 (hence no Pertino on there yet) and CloudatCost is CentOS 6 and 7 only. So that rules that concept out, I think.

                  Pretty sure mine is running CentOS 6.5
                  But yeah it's not really possible

                  I doubt it. Mine is fully up-to-date and still on CentOS 5.

                  cat /etc/redhat-release
RecoveryOS release 6.5 (Final)

 uname -a
2.6.32-504.1.3.el6_bp.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 21 16:41:42 EST 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64      GNU/Linux


cat install.log
Installing glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.57rhs-1.el6_5.x86_64
warning: glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.57rhs-1.el6_5.x86_64: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key I     D c105b9de: NOKEY
Installing glusterfs-api-3.4.0.57rhs-1.el6_5.x86_64
Installing libgcc-4.4.7-4.el6.x86_64
Installing setup-2.8.14-20.el6_4.1.noarch
Installing filesystem-2.4.30-3.el6.x86_64
Installing mailcap-2.1.31-2.el6.noarch
Installing basesystem-10.0-4.el6.noarch
Installing ncurses-base-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64

                  I didn't list all the install.log but it's definetly. CentOS 6. The Packages even have EL6 and EL6_5 in some of them.

                  Hmmm...odd...I'm on the latest release...

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                    last edited by

                    @thanksajdotcom said:

                    Hmmm...odd...I'm on the latest release...

                    Did you miss my point about the age of the install? Even if they moved up to CentOS 6... how would your older install have gotten updated?

                    thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @thanksajdotcom said:

                      Hmmm...odd...I'm on the latest release...

                      Did you miss my point about the age of the install? Even if they moved up to CentOS 6... how would your older install have gotten updated?

                      I would think they'd push out an update to update the core OS files too, or change the repos or something.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @thanksajdotcom said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @thanksajdotcom said:

                        Hmmm...odd...I'm on the latest release...

                        Did you miss my point about the age of the install? Even if they moved up to CentOS 6... how would your older install have gotten updated?

                        I would think they'd push out an update to update the core OS files too, or change the repos or something.

                        That's not how CentOS works. That would just stop updates. They would have to write a massive OS updating system to handle this. CentOS didn't have that between CentOS 5 and CentOS 6. So what you are asking of them, while not crazy, is extreme. It's not something that they can "just do". They'd have to make this a major focus of development.

                        thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • thanksajdotcomT
                          thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @thanksajdotcom said:

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @thanksajdotcom said:

                          Hmmm...odd...I'm on the latest release...

                          Did you miss my point about the age of the install? Even if they moved up to CentOS 6... how would your older install have gotten updated?

                          I would think they'd push out an update to update the core OS files too, or change the repos or something.

                          That's not how CentOS works. That would just stop updates. They would have to write a massive OS updating system to handle this. CentOS didn't have that between CentOS 5 and CentOS 6. So what you are asking of them, while not crazy, is extreme. It's not something that they can "just do". They'd have to make this a major focus of development.

                          Ok, I'd think it'd be a simple thing to add the CentOS 6 repos, run a yum update, and allow the packages to update. What makes it not that simple?

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                            last edited by

                            @thanksajdotcom said:

                            Ok, I'd think it'd be a simple thing to add the CentOS 6 repos, run a yum update, and allow the packages to update. What makes it not that simple?

                            That it does nothing. A CentOS 5 system, pointed to CentOS 6 repos will simply see the as not applying. You can't change your OS version using YUM.

                            thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • thanksajdotcomT
                              thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              @thanksajdotcom said:

                              Ok, I'd think it'd be a simple thing to add the CentOS 6 repos, run a yum update, and allow the packages to update. What makes it not that simple?

                              That it does nothing. A CentOS 5 system, pointed to CentOS 6 repos will simply see the as not applying. You can't change your OS version using YUM.

                              Oh, I was not aware of that.

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @thanksajdotcom
                                last edited by

                                @thanksajdotcom said:

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                @thanksajdotcom said:

                                Ok, I'd think it'd be a simple thing to add the CentOS 6 repos, run a yum update, and allow the packages to update. What makes it not that simple?

                                That it does nothing. A CentOS 5 system, pointed to CentOS 6 repos will simply see the as not applying. You can't change your OS version using YUM.

                                Oh, I was not aware of that.

                                Maybe you are thinking of Minor release updates, not major release.

                                thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • thanksajdotcomT
                                  thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                                  @thanksajdotcom said:

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @thanksajdotcom said:

                                  Ok, I'd think it'd be a simple thing to add the CentOS 6 repos, run a yum update, and allow the packages to update. What makes it not that simple?

                                  That it does nothing. A CentOS 5 system, pointed to CentOS 6 repos will simply see the as not applying. You can't change your OS version using YUM.

                                  Oh, I was not aware of that.

                                  Maybe you are thinking of Minor release updates, not major release.

                                  Yeah, must be.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1
                                  • 2
                                  • 1 / 2
                                  • First post
                                    Last post