I need help installing vmware tools for Centos!
-
There is something basic being missed here. CentOS comes with the VMware tools already installed and fully managed by the OS. If you follow the VMware docs it says this right in them.
Also your OS is telling you this. That's why it is saying that the tools are already there. There is nothing to install, everything is already working.
-
This is another case of CentOS being so easy that it is confusing for people coming from harder operating systems.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
This is another case of CentOS being so easy that it is confusing for people coming from harder operating systems.
CentOS has VMware Tools installed by default? Is this on VMs only or on any install of CentOS period?
-
CentOS has the VMware tools built in in version 7.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
CentOS has the VMware tools built in in version 7.
That just seems odd to me...
-
@thanksaj said:
That just seems odd to me...
I'm curious, why does that seem odd to you?
I think it's very clever. One less thing to install later. -
@thanksaj said:
That just seems odd to me...
Most Linux distros already come with the equivalent tools from Xen and KVM, why not VMware. Some, like Suse, come with HyperV's tools already as well. I think that it is both the most natural thing ever, given the way that all other packages in Linux work, and one of the smartest as it makes Linux so much easier than ever before and than anyone else.
-
@nadnerB said:
I think it's very clever. One less thing to install later.
While that's nice, I think that it is minor. The far better thing is that the package is tested and maintained and automatically updated!
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksaj said:
That just seems odd to me...
Most Linux distros already come with the equivalent tools from Xen and KVM, why not VMware. Some, like Suse, come with HyperV's tools already as well. I think that it is both the most natural thing ever, given the way that all other packages in Linux work, and one of the smartest as it makes Linux so much easier than ever before and than anyone else.
CentOS 7 also comes with Hyper-V tools pre-installed.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
CentOS has the VMware tools built in in version 7.
With that being said, should I try to delete the files that I extracted from the vmware disc that I mounted? Will it cause any problems having extra vmware folder in /tmp.
Thank for that feed back.
-
-
@MrWright4hire said:
With that being said, should I try to delete the files that I extracted from the vmware disc that I mounted? Will it cause any problems having extra vmware folder in /tmp.
Just wastes space. Just delete everything from /tmp. Many systems, like Solaris, mount /tmp into memory so that it is automatically flushed after every reboot. Many other systems use a cron job to blow away /tmp when it is on disk on a routine basis so that it doesn't collect dust.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@MrWright4hire said:
With that being said, should I try to delete the files that I extracted from the vmware disc that I mounted? Will it cause any problems having extra vmware folder in /tmp.
Just wastes space. Just delete everything from /tmp. Many systems, like Solaris, mount /tmp into memory so that it is automatically flushed after every reboot. Many other systems use a cron job to blow away /tmp when it is on disk on a routine basis so that it doesn't collect dust.
Will do! Thanks again for the feed back.
-
Hello Mango fam. I need a lil help with linux command. The issue is that I added a group and added users that group, but when I use "ls -l" I don't see the group listed by the users name. When I go into each individual user directory I don't see the group that I assign them to. However, when I do cat /etc/group I see the group and the members I assigned.
Why can I not see them when I'm in the user dir, home dir and use "ls -l"? -
The ls command is short for "list" and it simply lists the files in a directory, nothing more. It shows who the owner is of a file or folder and who the group owner is, but it tells you nothing about which users and members of which groups. That's a different concept not related to the filesystem.
Use the "id" command instead.
-
This post is deleted! -
@MrWright4hire said:
Here you go @scottalanmiller:
[New Microsoft Office Word Document (2).docx](uploading 100%)
You posted while it was still uploading. You have to wait until it completes and the portion that says (uploading 100%) turns into the image link rather than a status message.
-
Here you go Scott:
You see how bob has projectX by his name in the first exhibit. I want to make it like that.
-
Why are you putting screenshots into Word before uploading them? Just upload the screenshot directly.
-
Okay, so what you are showing here, with the ls command, is which user (UID) and which group (GID) are assigned as the owners of a set of files or folders (folders are a type of file in Linux.)
So the folder (a.k.a. directory) named Bob used to belong to Bob (user) and ProjectX (group.) Now it has been changed to Bob (the user) and Bob (the group.) None of this alters either Bob the user nor Bob the group but just changed who is listed as the owners of the directory named Bob.
