Oracle VM Server versus Xen
-
For what it's worth, I completely agree'd with everything said here about it, why do it? There would be no gain etc.
It's all in the OP.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller Do you have a need for RHEL 3?
Because it is old and pointless, just like Oracle VM is now.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
So I should wipe everything out, and start over with Oracle VM?
Thx will get started now!
I know, we should use Red Hat Linux 5.0 Hurricane!
-
@travisdh1 said:
@DustinB3403 said:
So I should wipe everything out, and start over with Oracle VM?
Thx will get started now!
I know, we should use Red Hat Linux 5.0 Hurricane!
Wasn't someone on SW running that this week?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@travisdh1 said:
@DustinB3403 said:
So I should wipe everything out, and start over with Oracle VM?
Thx will get started now!
I know, we should use Red Hat Linux 5.0 Hurricane!
Wasn't someone on SW running that this week?
omg, I thought I was joking!
-
Really Red Hat Linux 5.0?
SW never ceases to amaze and wonder!
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@travisdh1 said:
@DustinB3403 said:
So I should wipe everything out, and start over with Oracle VM?
Thx will get started now!
I know, we should use Red Hat Linux 5.0 Hurricane!
Wasn't someone on SW running that this week?
Is that the same as RHEL 5? Because we have one or two of those still.
-
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@travisdh1 said:
@DustinB3403 said:
So I should wipe everything out, and start over with Oracle VM?
Thx will get started now!
I know, we should use Red Hat Linux 5.0 Hurricane!
Wasn't someone on SW running that this week?
Is that the same as RHEL 5? Because we have one or two of those still.
No, the RH series was spent and replaced by the RHEL series. So RHEL 5 is a full five generations after the RH series died off. And RH 5 was nowhere near the end of the line.
-
The latest Red Hat Linux release was Red Hat Linux 9 in early 2003. Thirteen years ago!
-
RH 5 was the first Red Hat Linux that I used. It released in 1997!! About to turn twenty!
