ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb

    IT Discussion
    6
    42
    4.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @matteo nunziati
      last edited by

      @matteo-nunziati said in OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb:

      @Doyler3000 xfs+lvm or zfs. In any case consider an hba and passthru disks/hba to the vm making soft raid if you can manage it.

      Definitely don't do that. Passthrough to a VM is terrible. Very complex and it bypasses loads of the critical abstraction.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        It would also keep ESXi from being able to use those disks in any way as an additional problem. ESXi can't use software RAID in any form. So no way to even share them.

        matteo nunziatiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • matteo nunziatiM
          matteo nunziati @scottalanmiller
          last edited by matteo nunziati

          @scottalanmiller I was thinking about a dedicated array not something used by esxi.
          Does passthru cause all these issues? I've used it some time ago and it was really nice. Anyway it was not esxi

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @matteo nunziati
            last edited by

            @matteo-nunziati said in OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb:

            @scottalanmiller I was thinking about a dedicated array not something used by esxi.
            Does passthru cause all this issues? I've used it some time ago and it was relly nice. Anyway it was not esxi

            Passthrough will do things like break backups and snapshotting, for example. It makes the system have two different consistency layers. Requires lots of complexity on the hardware side where you have to know which drives and physically handled in what way.

            And then your RAID has to be handled in the VM rather than in the hardware, which isn't horrific, but it isn't great. That's stuff you want at super low latency that putting into a VM means there is more overhead. And things like restores, failovers... become very hard and complex itself of simply restoring from backup.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Doyler3000D
              Doyler3000 @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller Sorry, my choice of terminology didn't make things very clear there. By replicating I mean replicating the functionality rather than the snapshots themselves. At the moment if I developer deletes a file by mistake they can go to the .zfs folder in the root of their home and restore the file from one of the daily snapshots. I think if they were no longer able to do the equivalent of this, that I might get some resistance.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Doyler3000D
                Doyler3000 @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb:

                @Doyler3000 said in OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb:

                We're almost entirely a linux operation here though we have a few windows clients.

                Just have to mention that this fact makes ESXi a weird choice as you need a range of skills instead of being able to focus on the ones that you have. If you have Linux skills, you are ready for KVM or Xen 🙂

                In my (shaky) defence I had stronger VMWare skills than Linux skills at the time 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Doyler3000D
                  Doyler3000
                  last edited by

                  Thanks all, I very much appreciate lots of great advice.
                  I've already got a XenServer installed and I'm going to take a look at Xen Orchestra now. As regards OS/Filesystems OpenSuse (or Centos) with XFS and LVM will get some testing in the near future.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Doyler3000
                    last edited by

                    @Doyler3000 said in OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb:

                    Thanks all, I very much appreciate lots of great advice.
                    I've already got a XenServer installed and I'm going to take a look at Xen Orchestra now. As regards OS/Filesystems OpenSuse (or Centos) with XFS and LVM will get some testing in the near future.

                    I'm not sure if LVM will be as convenient for the end users or not. If not, ZFS might make sense still. ZFS on openSuse would likely be a good place to start.... but ZFS on Ubuntu is the most mature at this point.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Doyler3000D
                      Doyler3000
                      last edited by

                      I've not used LVM snapshotting before so it'll be good to experiment with it and understand it's advantages and limitations. It may not keep the end users (almost all developers) happy so I might need to revisit.

                      If ZFS is a requirement do you think ZFS on Ubuntu rather than ZFS on FreeBSD say?
                      I'd need to get a lot more familiar with FreeBSD which is the disadvantage but maybe it's worthwhile?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Doyler3000
                        last edited by

                        @Doyler3000 said in OS/Filesystem for file server ~ 8Tb:

                        I've not used LVM snapshotting before so it'll be good to experiment with it and understand it's advantages and limitations. It may not keep the end users (almost all developers) happy so I might need to revisit.

                        If ZFS is a requirement do you think ZFS on Ubuntu rather than ZFS on FreeBSD say?
                        I'd need to get a lot more familiar with FreeBSD which is the disadvantage but maybe it's worthwhile?

                        ZFS on Ubuntu is fine. Especially for a VM. No need for FreeBSD in this case.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        • 3 / 3
                        • First post
                          Last post