@emad-r No issues booting from Raid 1, system has been live for 4 years.
No it is not using UEFI.

EVENTUALLY
if you really want a comma separated list of items into a string you must format it:

 print("%s; %s" % t)

in this case I've used a semicolon to point out the difference.

Just to add a little bit to the formatting of strings.

If you are using python 3.6+ you can use formatted string literals or f-strings which in my opinion are much easier to read and use, rather than formatting with % or .format() or concatenating strings.

print(f'{name},{dob}')
romo,1986

You can use dnsmasq to achieve what you want. It will block all requests except the domains you choose. You have to add the following to your dnsmasq.conf file.

bogus-priv
domain-needed
no-resolv  # blocks the usage of your resolv.conf file and hosts files, and only allows upstream servers set in this file.

#  Whitelist - will forward dns request to the following domains
server=/mangolassi.it/1.1.1.1 # Dns to which to forward the allowed request

@rojoloco that does change the complexity of the solution then.

Crazy idea, if you have any sort of configuration management tool, you could still do one vm, 3 dnsmasq containers and push manual dns settings via the config-management tool to your users to their respective dns server.

Sorry to resurrect an old thread

@JaredBusch Did you ever get the phones to talk to the pbx (Freepbx 14) via https using the Let's Encrypt certs?

@dbeato said in Help troubleshooting L2TP over IPSEC VPN connections.:

@romo said in Help troubleshooting L2TP over IPSEC VPN connections.:

@dbeato Yes

Okay, was looking at that error on other OpenVPN clients that had issues on older versions.

It looks like it is a Strongswan issue, as a temporary fix it should be resolved by manually restarting the IPSec VPN (restart vpn). Unfortunately, during working hours it seems to be too disruptive to use for properly connected users. At least without having tested the effects of the restart for connected users.

The strange thing is the connection is acting as if two computers were trying to access the VPN server behind the same NAT when according to the user it is only a single device.

So we have a new computer (ASRock A320M-HDV + AMD A10-9700 RADEON R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G)which was just deployed last friday that keeps getting sudden blackouts. At first those blackouts completely froze the computer, we updated to the lastest driver directly from AMD which fixed the freezing but the user keeps getting the blackouts.

Anyone have any idea what else could be done to fix the issue?

@gjacobse Will be doing this as well, thanks Gene

@scottalanmiller triggered the error again, so updates didn't help.

Ran a webgl benchmark in chrome on one monitor while surfing on the other. Watching CPUZ, temp was reaching 60C when the errors where logged.

@taurex Site to site is working properly

About 640 days of uptime on the server, so that could be a reason.

@pete-s Those where taken using chrome but all browsers have the tools.

Here are couple screenshots from firefox webdev tools

Performance Tab

From the google chrome dev tools you can even get an audit using Lighthouse

You get a report like this:

A DNAT rule was the culprit of everything, it was redirecting the traffic and not letting it reach WAN_LOCAL.

FINALLY SOLVED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As reminder for anyone that could encounter a similar issue:
DNAT rules are evaluated before firewall rules.

@manxam said in Outlook Out of Memory to Open Large Folder:

Seeing as how it IS a 64 installation and is not using more than a couple of gigs of ram as stated in your title post, I'd suggest it's a corrupt profile.

Is this connected to IMAP or Exchange? If so, why not spin up a new profile and let the mail sync and see what happens?

The only issues that we ever run into with Outlook are fixed with a new profile which, thankfully, is a quick process -- unless you're using POP3 (kill me now!)

The user has 2 ost files:

And using cached Exchange Mode

She has around 43 user mailboxes as well, thinking this could be whats causing the issues.

@manxam Apparently, she doesn't need all of them so we are going to start removing them. For the moment, I disabled the shared mailboxes to be available offline and she says everything has been working better.

Getting the following logs from the docker container:

wsd-00026-00053 2018-11-22 17:36:11.045672 [ docbroker_005 ] ERR  Cannot get file info from WOPI storage uri [https://nc.domain.com/apps/richdocuments/wopi/files/59572_ocxqc3gr3v6o?access_token=2mcS0atAQxZXjW25Be3rTmQexxAHHddO&access_token_ttl=0&permission=edit]. Error: Connection refused| wsd/Storage.cpp:446

wsd-00026-00053 2018-11-22 17:36:11.048893 [ docbroker_005 ] ERR  Failed to add session to [/apps/richdocuments/wopi/files/59572_ocxqc3gr3v6o] with URI [https://nc.domain.com/apps/richdocuments/wopi/files/59572_ocxqc3gr3v6o?access_token=2mcS0atAQxZXjW25Be3rTmQexxAHHddO&access_token_ttl=0&permission=edit]: Connection refused| wsd/DocumentBroker.cpp:1041

wsd-00026-00053 2018-11-22 17:36:11.049298 [ docbroker_005 ] ERR  Error while loading : Connection refused| wsd/LOOLWSD.cpp:2534

Searching around, I found it could be related to the docker container not resolving the ip address properly, in this case it needing to be the internal ip.

Authentication was enabled but not properly set:

I had to got to :

Printer preferences -> Basic tab -> User Authentication and Account Track -> SET THE PROPER PASSWORD -> Verify

After that the computer was properly authorized to print =).

In some of the windows 7 machines we have deployed the meshagent, we have just been informed people are getting the Interactive Services Detection modal:

User sent photo

Any idea why this just started appearing?

@mattbagan said in Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect:

Am I supposed to create an account on their site or just follow the guide?

We are talking about the self-hosted version, documentation and info here https://www.meshcommander.com/meshcentral2. The other one in https://meshcentral.com/ is the old version which was only hosted by them.

Remote user is trying to copy a DB backup from a Windows share to his desktop, the file size is around 12GB.

Transfer starts properly but after around 10-12 minutes of the transfer it just suddenly gets terminated.

The router is an EdgeRouter Lite, which also handles this same DB backup from colocation back to office without apparent trouble via site to site IPSEC VPN.

Any idea how to troubleshoot this, and figure out why the transfer can't complete?