Installing Korora on my home desktop.

Messing around with my upgraded internet

Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from Radio Link Internet (192.198.x.x)...
Hosted by US Internet (Minnetonka, MN) [114.76 km]: 13.095 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 395.43 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 234.56 Mbit/s

@dashrender said in 1Gbps Fibre Internet Access:

It's their ballgame. As they are providing the equipment they get to decide what they use.

I suppose you could ask them to provide something smaller.

Is the 1u a problem for you?

It seems odd to me that they aren't providing their own tack for their own equipment.

In my case, my ISP installed their own wall mounted quarter rack plus USP at the DMARC location.

It takes up a fair amount of space but in my case it's not an issue.

CenturyLink is the same, I have to have a Juniper sr224 for a 100mbps fiber in my rack. Fiber into the juniper copper out... Empty sfp port on edgerouter

They use RIP to announce my assigned subnets back into their network... Very clunky

UNMS version 0.9.1 has been released, see the changelog below. It is a hotfix release with new FW especially for EdgeRouters which includes critical bug-fix for UNMS users. There is a more info about it in this thread. Next UNMS version 0.10.0 will be integrated with UBNT FW API and it will be possible to download new FW automatically. For detailed installation and update instructions view our guide: Installation & Update. Please, continue to share your thoughts and requests.

Source: UBNT Forums

This fixes an issue for some EdgeRouters that could lose their config during UNMS / Firmware upgrades

Upgrade instructions for current installations

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Ubiquiti-App/UNMS/master/install.sh > /tmp/unms_install.sh && sudo bash /tmp/unms_install.sh --update

@dustinb3403 said in ESXi and Xen Orchestra - Licensing models that are eerily similar:

@dashrender Oh it absolutely is pay per feature, as you go up in the pricing model you get more features.

XOA is pay per feature/support

XO is free

@jaredbusch said in Ubiquiti Security Gateway:

@donaldlandru said in Ubiquiti Security Gateway:

@dustinb3403 said in Ubiquiti Security Gateway:

So last annoying question (hopefully).. . .

Why does Ubiquiti have so many different products that overlap so much?

Simple answer: multiple audiences. Different product lines are geared for different uses.

That is the nice answer.

I am a nice guy... question mark

@dustinb3403 said in Ubiquiti Security Gateway:

So last annoying question (hopefully).. . .

Why does Ubiquiti have so many different products that overlap so much?

Simple answer: multiple audiences. Different product lines are geared for different uses.

Someone else may have caught this. I just saw it on reddit

Well at least the Museum responded nicely

"Hi <Lady>! This event is taking place during the actual solar eclipse, and is centered around watching the eclipse happen in real time. We are also celebrating with an eclipse-themed sleepover on August 11 that will focus on the science of the eclipse and other sun-related activities. That event might work better for your kids!"

@eddiejennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

Apparently we had a power outage at the office. So I'm driving there now to turn back on everything so my boss can connect to the VPN And run queries against the production database server.

That sucks.

Just got this installed on my Thinkpad 450S. Lightning fast. So far the only concern I can find is that there is not a Linux sender/presenter for our Infocus Liteshow or WePresent Wireless presentation gateways. MirrorOp is the software we use on Mac, Windows, Android, and iOS -- but can't find Linux

@travisdh1 said in Raspberri Pi, don't use if you've used Debian based distros!:

@gjacobse said in Raspberri Pi, don't use if you've used Debian based distros!:

@travisdh1 said in Raspberri Pi, don't use if you've used Debian based distros!:

@gjacobse said in Raspberri Pi, don't use if you've used Debian based distros!:

I wonder if this here is the reason why you had so much trouble.... Not that I know that much about it:

Honeeepi
Honeeepi is a honeypot sensor on Raspberry Pi which based on customized Raspbian OS.

The first release (v201310) consist of Dionaea honeypot which only operate on Raspberry pi B Model.
The second release (v201501) was pre-installed with several honeypot packages (Dionaea, Kippo, Conpot, Glastopf) and run on both Raspberry pi B and B+ Model.
Third release (v201509) was pre-installed with multiple honeypot packages (Dionaea, Kippo, Conpot, Glastopf)and in additional of classic like honeypot honeyd, amun that run on Raspberry pi 2, B and B+.
Fourth release (v201610) was pre-installed with updated honeypot packages (Dionaea, Cowrie, Conpot, Glastopf)and in additional of classic like honeypot honeyd, amun that run on Raspberry pi 3 model B.

It also run the ntop, snort and remote pcap to allow network monitoring and capturing of pcap for further analysis.

They are all pre-installed, but not one automatically runs at boot. You have to do that yourself, which isn't hard, but I wanted to give it the Office Space treatment before I ever got to that point.

Makes sense....

Thought I am still reading - just what is the honeypot?

A honeypot is something that pretends to be a real service, but really has no service(s) running and just logs what is done on the system. You know those global internet attack maps? A honeypot is how they generally collect that data.

It's a trap

@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

Installing on your work laptop? Nice.

Eh, I needed to reimage anyways. Try it for a bit and then probably switch back

Here we go Korora and drink

@lakshmana said in Bat file Protection:

@scottalanmiller said in Bat file Protection:

om the confusion and not part of his goals.

But goal is correct you people confused with .exe and .bat file i think

I am not drunk enough for this. GL @scottalanmiller

@scottalanmiller I was referring to this. He mentions an action involving 7zip and an exe file

@scottalanmiller said in Bat file Protection:

The friend opened the .exe with the help of .zip or 7 zip.He should not do that and should not read the .bat file too

Ok maybe I am slow but I am piecing this together.

The .exe is probably a self extracting zip file. Inside is a bunch of installers and a batch file to run them.

Just stop doing this now. Grab PDQ Deploy or ninite or any other number of tools. Use sodium for the inventory portion.

@scottalanmiller said in Bat file Protection:

@donaldlandru said in Bat file Protection:

@lakshmana said in Bat file Protection:

Having 15 Softwares like Adobe,Microsoft Office Package,Antivirus are packaged as .exe.
Where having 7 zip the friend able to see the files inside that .exe file
Inside the exe file the bat file is there for automation of the installation but the friend able to read that initialization of the commands for security reasons he should not see that file.This is the full story

I still don't understand what security risk there is your friend seeing silent install commands. Unless are you providing passwords to elevate the context the script runs in?

Basically he's got a friend acting as the administrator and he's trying to violate an immutable law of security - you always have to trust your administrators.

@lakshmana said in Bat file Protection:

Having 15 Softwares like Adobe,Microsoft Office Package,Antivirus are packaged as .exe.
Where having 7 zip the friend able to see the files inside that .exe file
Inside the exe file the bat file is there for automation of the installation but the friend able to read that initialization of the commands for security reasons he should not see that file.This is the full story

I still don't understand what security risk there is your friend seeing silent install commands. Unless are you providing passwords to elevate the context the script runs in?

Another day of