ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. DenisKelley
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 8
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 244
    • Groups 0

    Posts

    Recent Best Controversial
    • RE: Veeam Backup

      @KOOLER said:

      @DenisKelley said:

      ** I'll be at VeeamOn next week** and one of the things I need to wrap my head around is how Veeam processes synthetic fulls when pushing to the "cloud." I run my setup with Reverse Increments and drop to tape, but now that my Internet bandwidth is speeding up, I'm thinking of switching to Forward Increments and using the synthetic fulls.

      Check you PM. I'll be there. You're welcomed to shake hands and share some drinks 🙂

      Dang, sorry Kooler. I didn't have alerts go to email and completely missed this. I was wondering if you were going to make and am sorry we didn't get a chance to meet.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Veeam Backup

      @Dashrender said:

      @DenisKelley Do you have Veeam creating new full backups on any type of schedule? or are you only using continuous incrementals?

      Right now I use Reverse Incrementals, so no, I don't generate separate fulls. With the reverse method, you don't need to create fulls like you do with the Forward method. With reverse, you get one delta file which is then injected into a master full each backup. I then move that one file, after running a SureBackup (super cool feature) and move it offsite daily via tape.

      I won't be able to use the Reverse if I start porting the off-site stuff to "cloud", since based on my last calculation, it would take me 20 Days and I think that just might be a problem. 🙂

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Anything better than Microsofts Remote Desktop Connection Manager?

      I use Devolution's Remote Desktop Manager. Very nice and they have a free and paid version.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Veeam Backup

      I'll be at VeeamOn next week and one of the things I need to wrap my head around is how Veeam processes synthetic fulls when pushing to the "cloud." I run my setup with Reverse Increments and drop to tape, but now that my Internet bandwidth is speeding up, I'm thinking of switching to Forward Increments and using the synthetic fulls.

      While not backup, you can have a parallel replication job to an offsite server. You can seed the job and then kick the deltas over which would not require a full after you set it up. At the target server, you can also keep a number of versions. I have a local server (cheap HP box) where I use this replication setup monthly so it mirrors my monthly off-site tapes. Mainly for convenience so when I need to grab something 6 mos. out (we keep 31 days local) I don't have to restore from the actual monthly tape. Just started this 3 mos ago.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Consumer Grade SSDs vs Enterprise Grade SSDs

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @DenisKelley said:

      I think I saw someone where the replacement drive for one of the HPs was actually an Intel drive. This stuff grinds my gears.

      What's wrong with Intel for SSD drives? There are only a handful of solid state memory vendors making all of the parts.

      Nothing wrong with them. I have them in all my Workstations. What grinds my gears is that the HP drive is a re-branding of the Intel Enterprise drive at a substantial markup. See here:

      https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/post/4513384

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Consumer Grade SSDs vs Enterprise Grade SSDs

      My complaint earlier this year:
      https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/895156-ssds-and-how-can-hp-and-dell-justify-their-prices

      I think I saw someone where the replacement drive for one of the HPs was actually an Intel drive. This stuff grinds my gears.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: ESXi and Proliant Weekend Woes

      Re: VeeamBackup_VEEAM1 (inactive) (unmounted).
      What is this all about? The other hosts don't have this datastore and our Veeam server is powered on and has successfully backed up the host, so I'm not seeing any operational issues. I don't think this problem is related to my boot problems, but I'd like to get it cleaned up anyway.

      This just means that the NFS mount from Veeam, which is used as a connection for the backup is unmounted. When you backup a VM, Veeam will create on of these and it will show up as a datastore. This has happened to me when I moved my backup software to a new server. I just remove the unmounted store. It will get recreated if necessary and the files don't really sit on the host.

      I'm pretty sure you are correct and that this is unrelated to your present problem.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Roku, Chromecast, FireStick or something else

      Love my Roku 3. Very nice and has all the channels I need.

      posted in Water Closet
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Upgrading ESXi from 5.5u1 to 5.5u2

      FWIW, I used a generic ESXi 6.0 ISO on my Dell T110 II Test Server (cause Dell and VMWare didn't have one at the time) and it upgraded right over top. I was concerned that the vanilla ISO would not get the NIC and other components working since it might need drivers, but it kept them. I was going from 5.1U1 to 6.0 and it just worked.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Move ESXi VM and keep MAC address

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @DenisKelley said:

      ....some flavor of Linux, would assign a new MAC address to a new eth0 NIC.

      The MAC isn't assigned by Linux. You can override it there. But this would be the hardware, the hypervisor or the driver doing that, not Linux.

      Good to know. Just knew it was add and assigned new MAC as first NIC.

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @DenisKelley said:

      If I remember, possibly newer versions of ESXi have a reserved block of MACs that may be causing the error above.

      Yes, that's what I have seen people run into. Using the reserved block and then wanting mobility of the reserved block.

      So you're saying I can't have my cake and eat it too?

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Move ESXi VM and keep MAC address

      One, after the fact use cases I ran into, was when I was playing with ESXi and Veeam replication of vCenter 5.0. Upon successful replication of the vCenter appliance from one host to another, I found that the O/S running vCenter, some flavor of Linux, would assign a new MAC address to a new eth0 NIC. You could go in via command line and fix that, but as a more Windows-type admin, no one has time for that. My fix then was to copy the MAC address on host one. When you switch the MAC type to static, it will want to assign something new (why you copied prior to this). Once done, I now had a good replicated vCenter. My environment really doesn't need one, but was playing.

      If I remember, possibly newer versions of ESXi have a reserved block of MACs that may be causing the error above. Anyway, that's my 2 pennies.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: What is the difference between Unitrends and Veeam?

      @art_of_shred said:

      We all come into contact with various, unique environments, so being well-rounded in your knowledge is a much better plan than simply being a fan-boy for a particular product.

      Obvious comment is well, obvious. 🙂 I was saying fanboy mainly in how much I'm floored by this product. I've handled many different ones and, yes, if my environment was different I might be using something else. I only posted mainly because of the post title and the other comments that were basically "it only backs up VMs.". To be honest, I've never (after close to 20 years in IT) gotten passionate about a backup software before Veeam. It's weird.

      It's both a floor wax AND a dessert topping.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: What is the difference between Unitrends and Veeam?

      @coliver

      Hopefully the info helps. Yeah, I've discovered I've become a Veeam fanboy of late. 🙂

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: What is the difference between Unitrends and Veeam?

      @coliver said:

      @art_of_shred said:

      Yup, Unitrends has been heavily focused in the physical appliance, with integrated software and storage, while they offer software-only options. They also, AFAIK, hold the record on supported OS's. Veeam is software protection of virtual, primarily.

      Does Veeam not offer things like Exchange or SQL backup? That seems like a fairly big downside to that solution.

      @scottalanmiller said:

      The other big difference is that Veeam is targeted on virtual backups only, they do not address applications or operating systems, only hypervisors (HyperV and VMware ESXi.)

      Unfortunately, this is not accurate. Veeam does focus only on virtual servers only. While they focus on VM-level backups, they do not ignore enterprise applications. They have tools to item-level restore:

      • Exchange Server
      • SQL Server
      • Active Directory

      In fact, a tool like their Veeam Explorer for Exchange doesn't even require Exchange to be mounted. You can use this tool to recover items as long as you have access to the MDB files for Exchange 2010 and higher. They have a separate tool for Exchange 2007 which I use right now temporarily.

      During a complete meltdown, you can actually spin up the failed server using the backup file until you can recover and move it to it's final destination.

      Veeam natively handles both backup and replication. The two are not necessarily dependent on each other and can play into your D&R plans. You can have instant failover and failback. Licensing of these features are always on the source machines, not the target hosts. So if you just have one box, you can drop in a cheap one and replicate to it without requiring additional software.

      With Enterprise (both in Essentials and their high-end version which does WAN optimization) you get SureBackup Lab. This is super freaking awesome. Basically, you can craft a test isolated test lab and automate your backup testing in the lab. I have this setup for all my backup jobs. Basically what happens after each backup is that it will spin up the VM from the backup file (after spinning any dependency VMs like a DC first) verify that it can boot, NICs can be pinged, and any application-specific services and roles like Exchange, AD, and SQL can actually be verified. I have this setup and all my backups are verified EVERY DAY. One last thing is you can also use the SureBackup Lab for testing. I often, drop in some VMs when I want to do some testing of changes I want to do with productions VMs. The lab comes with a Proxy appliance that you can punch a hole in to get access to the isolated lab. I'm doing this now with our ERP software where I'm making some updates. I've given Accounting access so they can play their testing with real data, but in a safe environment.

      Want complete insight into your virtualization environment? Disk IOPS, datastore latency, CPU utilization over time, etc. Well, they will give it to you for free VeeamOne. Paid version comes with a few more features. This is pretty awesome.

      Got non-servers you'd like to backup too. Well, they have a free tool for that also now that will allow you to manage that within your backup console.

      Sorry to post a wall of info, but these comments worried me and I felt the need to provide a better insight into Veeam. I've played with Unitrends and they have a nice product, I just don't feel like it comes close to this product and its flexibility. So it just backups VMs. Yeah, but the tools they give just rock.

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: VMWare Fling of the Day - VirtualESXTop

      @NetworkNerd said:

      @DenisKelley said:

      VeeamOne Free is also a really nice utility to look at what's going on in your VMWare environment. Plus, it's pretty friendly.

      http://www.veeam.com/virtual-server-management-one-free.html

      Are you running it on the same server as your Veeam B & R install or on a different server?

      Same server. It's on a VM that also runs Spiceworks, WSUS, and PDQDeploy. Lot's of good graphs. I'm using the "paid" version, but the free looks like it has many of the same features.
      Capture.JPG

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: VMWare Fling of the Day - VirtualESXTop

      VeeamOne Free is also a really nice utility to look at what's going on in your VMWare environment. Plus, it's pretty friendly.

      http://www.veeam.com/virtual-server-management-one-free.html

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: William Shatner!!!

      Very nice. I'd suggest taking off the crown during the interview. That's just me. Good luck.

      posted in Water Closet
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Words to Live By Thread

      Don't trash your employer online. 🙂

      posted in Water Closet
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: Got a new job

      Congrats on the new job and I hope I get an awesome title like "Technical Support Engineer lols"
      🙂

      posted in Water Closet
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • RE: CloudatCost OpenDNS Issue

      This post made my day. I needed something to lift my spirits. 🙂

      posted in IT Discussion
      DenisKelleyD
      DenisKelley
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 12
    • 13
    • 3 / 13