ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. Brains
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 25
    • Posts 237
    • Best 81
    • Controversial 5
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Brains

    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @momurda said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      Try this

      msiexec /i "jre10filename.msi" /q ENTERPRISE=YES

      Just a long shot, obviously change it to the msi file name for java10.

      I tried by modifying the MSI to enable ENTERPRISE, but I think that caused additional problems (should have used a transform). I just went ahead and deployed the newer version of 8 and kicked this down the road until January 2019 when 8 is discontinued.

      Thanks for the help momurda, I appreciate it.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @jaredbusch said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      @brains said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      @jaredbusch said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      Why are you trying to install Java 10 when even java.com still installs Java 8?

      I'm told to upgrade Java to the latest version. If I shouldn't, I will need some legitimate reasons to push back. I really haven't followed all of the decisions regarding v9 and v10, so maybe this shouldn't be done at all? Do most of you guys deploy java, and if so, what is your official stances on 9 and 10?

      Java.com shows the latest as 8 update 171

      SO there ya go.

      Very informative. I am sure all of the fine points you made will be more than enough information for the I.T. Director!

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @momurda said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      Didn't even know 9 or 10 existed before your post.
      Usually the updater for Java will notify you going from major version to new major version.
      It did so with 6>7, then 7>8.

      We have the auto updater disabled since users cant update without admin credentials IIRC

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @jaredbusch said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      Why are you trying to install Java 10 when even java.com still installs Java 8?

      I'm told to upgrade Java to the latest version. If I shouldn't, I will need some legitimate reasons to push back. I really haven't followed all of the decisions regarding v9 and v10, so maybe this shouldn't be done at all? Do most of you guys deploy java, and if so, what is your official stances on 9 and 10?

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @jaredbusch said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      @brains said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      @momurda said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      msiexec /i "jre10filename.msi" /q ENTERPRISE=YES

      What does the ENTERPRISE switch do? Were you recommending I test to see if it fails installation when I run the command manually or did you want me to modify the MSI to add that value? Or create a transform (never done that before)?

      Just add the switch to your install command.

      It is obvious what it means from your earlier error of ERROR: LocalSystem is only supported for Enterprise MSI.

      You are only allowed to install Java locally with the enterprise MSI.

      That switch seems to tell it that it is the Enterprise version.

      What install command are you referring to? How would I add this to the GPO or should I modify the MSI?

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @momurda said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      msiexec /i "jre10filename.msi" /q ENTERPRISE=YES

      What does the ENTERPRISE switch do? Were you recommending I test to see if it fails installation when I run the command manually or did you want me to modify the MSI to add that value? Or create a transform (never done that before)?

      alt text

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @momurda said in GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error):

      Can you run the java 10 msi file directly with success?
      Perhaps prereq software needed.

      Yep. If I manually run the MSI, it installs fine.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @momurda My understanding is that 1603 errors are normally "generic" non-specific errors. I am pretty sure I covered all bullet pointed causes during my testing. There may be some Java 10 remnants in there somewhere, but the Java uninstall tool didn't find anything and I have tried applying the GPO to a machine that supposedly never had Java installed before - it still failed in the same way

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      @jaredbusch Could you point me to some documentation? I may have missed that part.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • GPO - Unable To Deploy Java 10 64bit - Fails to install (1603 Error)

      Hi all. I was hoping someone could shed some light on the issues I am having assisting my employee with a Java 10 Deployment through GPO. We previously installed Java 8 with no issue utilizing the same GPO. As a matter of fact, if I swap the Java 10 (64-bit) msi for a Java 8 (32-bit) msi in the GPO, it installs fine (Both MSIs are in the same folder on the file server). I have attached log files below. I acquired this msi the same way as version 8 - Ran the exe and pulled the msi from temp folder.

      Please let me know if I should look in additional locations for better information.

      Steps Taken

      • Wiped out cached GPO
        ** DEL /S /F /Q "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Microsoft\Group Policy\History*.*"
        ** REG DELETE HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies /f
        ** REG DELETE HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft /f
        ** REG DELETE HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft /f
        ** REG DELETE "HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Currentversion\Group Policy Objects" /f
        ** REG DELETE HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies /f
        ** DEL /F /Q C:\WINDOWS\security\Database\secedit.sdb
        ** Klist purge
      • Ran Java Uninstall Tool
      • Verified folder and file access for Authenticated Users and SYSTEM (Java 8 msi in same folder works)
      • Switched between Java 10 and Java 10.0.1 - Both 64bit
      • Enabled Windows Installer Logging via GPO
        ** voicewarmupx
      • Recreated GPO
      • Verified MSI Installs properly if ran manually

      Event Log Entries

      Log Name: System
      Source: Application Management Group Policy
      Date: 5/23/2018 12:47:18 PM
      Event ID: 108
      Task Category: None
      Level: Error
      Keywords: Classic
      User: SYSTEM
      Computer: <COMPUTERNAME>.pridedallas.com
      Description:
      Failed to apply changes to software installation settings. Software changes could not be applied. A previous log entry with details should exist. The error was : %%1603

      Log Name: System
      Source: Application Management Group Policy
      Date: 5/23/2018 12:47:18 PM
      Event ID: 303
      Task Category: None
      Level: Information
      Keywords: Classic
      User: SYSTEM
      Computer: <COMPUTERNAME> .pridedallas.com
      Description:
      The removal of the assignment of application Java 10.0.1 (64-bit) from policy Java - <GPO Name> succeeded.

      Log Name: System
      Source: Application Management Group Policy
      Date: 5/23/2018 12:47:18 PM
      Event ID: 102
      Task Category: None
      Level: Error
      Keywords: Classic
      User: SYSTEM
      Computer: <COMPUTERNAME> .pridedallas.com
      Description:
      The install of application Java 10.0.1 (64-bit) from policy Java - <GPO Name> failed. The error was : %%1603

      GPO Log

      Text
      4016 5/23/2018 12:47:06 PM Starting Software Installation Extension Processing. List of applicable Group Policy objects: (Changes were detected.) Foxit modusGate directQuarantine <Java GPO Name> Event XML

      1085 5/23/2018 12:47:18 PM Windows failed to apply the Software Installation settings. Software Installation settings might have its own log file. Please click on the "More information" link. Event XML

      7016 5/23/2018 12:47:18 PM Completed Software Installation Extension Processing in 11782 milliseconds. Event XML
      Screenshots of Policy

      Image: https://content.spiceworksstatic.com/service.community/p/post_images/0000309870/5b05bd2c/attached_image/1.jpg

      Image: https://content.spiceworksstatic.com/service.community/p/post_images/0000309871/5b05bd33/attached_image/2.jpg

      Log Files:

      jusched.log - https://pastebin.com/2VX3MQsR

      MSIb23b.log - https://pastebin.com/HQu2wYj7

      MSIb23c.log - https://pastebin.com/XLam3qVB

      MSIb239.log - https://pastebin.com/ht0hmg03

      The only error I can see is listed below. I haven't been able to find any results regarding this message:

      ERROR: LocalSystem is only supported for Enterprise MSI

      Thanks for the help!

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: Firmware update for HP printers bans third-party ink

      BTW it looks like they partially reversed their decision

      http://www.pcworld.com/article/3125645/printers/hp-rethinks-its-ink-policy-allowing-third-party-ink-again.html

      posted in News
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid

      @JaredBusch said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains stop attacking people that disagree with you.

      It is your opinion that a random Chinese shell company is a name brand. You can have that opinion all you want. But others are perfectly allowed, and even expected to have their own opinions.

      im not attacking anyone at all. he can have his opinion, but you should always be willing to discuss differences instead of just shouting contradictory information and expecting people to accept it as fact. He just wants to say, no, youre wrong instead of giving any kind of reasons or explanation.

      different opinion is fine, posting it as fact and directly contradicting someone without supplying any sort of evidence or conversation regarding why you think they are wrong is dumb and does not contribute to the discussion at all.

      My feeling aren't hurt, just trying to get him to add some substance to his posts to make them relevant and remove them from the shitpost category. if he wants to add to the discussion fine, but shitposting should always be frowned upon.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: What did you have for lunch or dinner today?

      @scottalanmiller said in What did you have for lunch or dinner today?:

      Crackers

      Dont you call me a cracker you Saltine looking mofo!

      posted in Water Closet
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      What do you expect for a crappy no-name brand?

      Them to fulfill their promised obligations. But I wouldn't have called HannsG/Hannspree a no-name brand, they are definitely low end but their brand has been around for quite a while and they make decent monitors.

      They are a chinese no name brand. and they are not decent monitors.

      They are a Chinese named brand and they are decent monitors for the price. Feel free to add a discussion here, or we can go back and forth contradicting each other and getting no where.

      I was adding my thoughts. You posted in a public forum, if you don't like comments don't post.

      sorry thought you were trying to be a productive member of the community, not shitposting. Gotcha! Will ignore you in the future

      Someone having a different opinion than you doesn't make it a shit post. But if you only want posts agreeing with you, you won't get that here.

      different opinion is fine, posting it as fact and directly contradicting someone without supplying any sort of evidence or conversation regarding why you think they are wrong is dumb.

      www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Shit Posting

      EDIT: aww i hurt ur feelings and you're downvoting my post *sniffle

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      What do you expect for a crappy no-name brand?

      Them to fulfill their promised obligations. But I wouldn't have called HannsG/Hannspree a no-name brand, they are definitely low end but their brand has been around for quite a while and they make decent monitors.

      They are a chinese no name brand. and they are not decent monitors.

      They are a Chinese named brand and they are decent monitors for the price. Feel free to add a discussion here, or we can go back and forth contradicting each other and getting no where.

      I was adding my thoughts. You posted in a public forum, if you don't like comments don't post.

      sorry thought you were trying to be a productive member of the community, not shitposting. Gotcha! Will ignore you in the future

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Brains said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      What do you expect for a crappy no-name brand?

      Them to fulfill their promised obligations. But I wouldn't have called HannsG/Hannspree a no-name brand, they are definitely low end but their brand has been around for quite a while and they make decent monitors.

      They are a chinese no name brand. and they are not decent monitors.

      They are a Chinese named brand and they are decent monitors for the price. Feel free to add a discussion here, or we can go back and forth contradicting each other and getting no where.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: What did you have for lunch or dinner today?

      Big Beef BBQ Ribs, caesar salad, and fried okra! Mmmm love being in the south! Now I just need to add another mile to my run today, small price to pay

      posted in Water Closet
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • RE: Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid

      @Jason said in Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid:

      What do you expect for a crappy no-name brand?

      Them to fulfill their promised obligations. But I wouldn't have called HannsG/Hannspree a no-name brand, they are definitely low end but their brand has been around for quite a while and they make decent monitors.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • Hannspree & Hanns-G Monitors - No US Warranty Available - All Methods of Contacting Support Invalid

      Hey I wanted to let everyone know that Hannspree/HannsG monitors may say they have a warranty, but you can't contact their warranty department anymore.

      Apparently A&D Electronics is no longer in business, which was their US warranty site in California? Also most of the OEM's support emails are bouncing back (including EU support)

      The monitor we purchased had a 1 year parts and 3 year labor warranty. We purchased this monitor in August 2014 and recently it started smelling of burning plastic. So we attempted to contact warranty support and were unsuccessful. So we contacted NeweggBusiness and they are replacing the faulty monitor for us!!! One of the reasons I love Newegg so much! They always take care of their customers

      sorry for the brevity, very busy at work, but wanted to make everyone aware.

      posted in IT Discussion
      BrainsB
      Brains
    • 1 / 1