XenServer 7 has launched!
-
@BRRABill said in XenServer 7 has launched!:
One thing I noticed today is that XS7 dropped the Server 2003 template. Not a huge deal, obviously.
Also, their XenTools no longer work. You have to use XenLegacy.
The xo-tools don't work for server 2003?
Or just don't work?
-
-
As ok that makes sense.
-
-
So it looks like it installs the PV stuff, just not the agent.
That might be the same as XS6.5 since they seem to have changed some stuff around in that arena.
-
@BRRABill Still have 6.5 in production here, but i just exported xoa disk in 5 minutes to a usb disk at my desk. 5min17s for 8GB
I then just exported it to my c:\ which is an ssd
same 8GB, 4m48sWhat are you choosing for the network interface for xfer vm that xen uses?
-
@momurda said
What are you choosing for the network interface for xfer vm that xen uses?
My server has (4) 1GB ports. I have the management interface on one of those, by itself.
-
This post is deleted! -
@momurda said in XenServer 7 has launched!:
@BRRABill Still have 6.5 in production here, but i just exported xoa disk in 5 minutes to a usb disk at my desk. 5min17s for 8GB
I then just exported it to my c:\ which is an ssd
same 8GB, 4m48sWhat are you choosing for the network interface for xfer vm that xen uses?
Also, are you doing a copy, backup, or export? Like an export in straight export?
And did you mean to ask what interface I have XO on? That is where it would export from. Or, through, rather.
I would LOVE to get this friggin' issue figured out.
-
I was exporting from Xencenter. I just shut the vm down and export.
I am talking bout this page
Network 0 is the default. However you have to either manually configure ip or have dhcp setup on your management network for that to work. I just set this to a vlan that i know dishes out dhcp, only for the xfer vm.
I was thinking perhaps you are hitting a bottleneck here if your settings force this go through a router that doesnt do Gb.
I hit about 400mbps (not constantly, but consistently) doing exports this way, during middle of the day. I could test when nobody is around later and hit a bit higher througput. -
@momurda said
I was thinking perhaps you are hitting a bottleneck here if your settings force this go through a router that doesnt do Gb.
I hit about 400mbps (not constantly, but consistently) doing exports this way, during middle of the day. I could test when nobody is around later and hit a bit higher througput.The machines I am exporting from/to are on the same switch.
-
@momurda said
I was thinking perhaps you are hitting a bottleneck here if your settings force this go through a router that doesnt do Gb.
I hit about 400mbps (not constantly, but consistently) doing exports this way, during middle of the day. I could test when nobody is around later and hit a bit higher througput.I finally got iPerf to work on the XS host.
Here are the results. Pretty sure it's not the connection.
[ 3] local 10.0.4.30 port 55737 connected with 10.0.4.40 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec -
Definitely not
-
-
As a point of reference...
I did a live migration tonight. So, basically the same sort of thing ... copying a VM from one XS to another.
It clipped along at about 65MBps. Took a little over 30 minutes to migrate about 110GB of data.
So, I don't think it is the hardware, or the network, or anything like that. It must truly be some bug in the exporting...
-
You mean a cross pool migration?
-
@olivier said in XenServer 7 has launched!:
You mean a cross pool migration?
From one standalone to another.
-
That's a cross pool migration
There is no such thing as a "standalone" server (despite XenCenter can say, the pool object is always here, from 1 to many hosts) -
@olivier said in XenServer 7 has launched!:
That's a cross pool migration
There is no such thing as a "standalone" server (despite XenCenter can say, the pool object is always here, from 1 to many hosts)Then it is a cross pool migration of two pools with 1 host each.
-
@olivier said in XenServer 7 has launched!:
That's a cross pool migration
There is no such thing as a "standalone" server (despite XenCenter can say, the pool object is always here, from 1 to many hosts)Like an LVM system with just one block device, one VG and on LV taking up the whole space. The layers are still there.
