ZeroTier Question

[WLS-ITGuy]

Also, I currently have IPv6 set to unmanaged. Any reason I should change this?

[scottalanmiller]

No, you should not be bridging anything that has been mentioned.

[WLS-ITGuy]

I did notice that the machines that are having issues are both registering their networks as Public. One was truly at a coffee shop. StarSchmucks to be exact. The other was at his house but for some reason his internet shows up as a public spot. I should be able to fix one of those for sure

[Dashrender]

The actual network as in real physical network should not matter public or not... The ZT network does need to be trusted though, and even that should matter on the client side because you aren't sharing your just accessing.

[Dashrender]

When having a problem open a CMS prompt and ping the severname... Check the ip ita resolving to... It should only use the ZT ip...

[WLS-ITGuy]

@Dashrender I just connected and pinging the server results in an IP address that isn't even on my network. ZeroTier or real LAN.

[JaredBusch]

@Dashrender said in ZeroTier Question:

The actual network as in real physical network should not matter public or not... The ZT network does need to be trusted though, and even that should matter on the client side because you aren't sharing your just accessing.

Exactly this. The ZeroTier network should be reporting as domain.

[WLS-ITGuy]

My LAN is 172.16.x.x

ZeroTier is 192.168.191.x

When I ping the DC I get 198.105.244.130

[Dashrender]

Sounds like you have a DNS issue. You might not be able to use short NetBIOS type names.. you might have to move to FQDN instead.

For example, if you're at StarBucks and the DHCP server gives a suffix of starbucks.com out with the IP, and you ping server1, your system might be pinging server1.starbucks.com instead of server1.yourdomain.com

[WLS-ITGuy]

@Dashrender For this machine it does resolve to a FQDN just with the 198.105.244.130 address instead of the ZT IP of the DC

[JaredBusch]

@WLS-ITGuy said in ZeroTier Question:

@Dashrender For this machine it does resolve to a FQDN just with the 198.105.244.130 address instead of the ZT IP of the DC

Are you sure your ZeroTier addresses are what you think they are?

[WLS-ITGuy]

@JaredBusch I hope so. I was looking at ZT Central when I typed it out

[Dashrender]

man, time to just double check... ipconfig in same session you ping server1. Where could that bizzaro IP could have come from? either ZT or DNS, or Hosts file.

[JaredBusch]

@WLS-ITGuy said in ZeroTier Question:

@JaredBusch I hope so. I was looking at ZT Central when I typed it out

Are you sure that you set the auto assign correctly?

[WLS-ITGuy]

@Dashrender Hmm - I just ping'd from my laptop (Mac OS X) and got the same address that I got on the other laptop. Here is the screenshot from my ZT Center.

http://i.imgur.com/LfOdpLn.png

Here is the info from the machine

http://i.imgur.com/T2NE4wr.png

[WLS-ITGuy]

This post is deleted!

[JaredBusch]

Ok, just tested this a little more.

Laptop off the LAN.
Ping from laptop to DC by name = ping resolves over ZeroTier IP.

C:\Users\xxxadmin.xxx>ping xxxdc01

Pinging xxxdc01 [10.202.3.11] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.202.3.11: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.202.3.11: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.202.3.11: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.202.3.11: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=128

Ping statistics for 10.202.3.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 43ms

But a ping from the DC to the device returns the devices local IP not the ZeroTier IP.

C:\Users\xxxadmin>ping dt-backup-lapto

Pinging dt-backup-lapto [192.168.1.8] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.8:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

Here is what ipconfig returns on the remote laptop.

C:\Users\xxxadmin.xxx>ipconfig

Windows IP Configuration


Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:

   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : fd56:5799:d8f6:3ed4:a199:9336:a36d:9068
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::e023:2905:284a:b878%24
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.202.3.188
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 25.255.255.254

Ethernet adapter Bluetooth Network Connection:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :

Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection:

   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::d90e:714e:228:aafb%12
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.8
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : xxx.local

[JaredBusch]

The DC is the image on the right. the laptop is the image on the left.

[jt1001001]

Did you check the client for viruses/rootkits? Had a similar issue where I was getting a public IP return when querying an internal DNS name; turns out the PC had a DNS hijack virus/rootkit on it returning all sort of odd results.

[WLS-ITGuy]

@JaredBusch Your screenshot brings up a question that I have been having since my Pertino days. Does the ZT NIC go first on the priority? I was getting some mixed messages from Pertino on the priority of things.