ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Introducing UbuntuBSD

    News
    ubuntu bsd unix ubuntubsd open source softpedia
    11
    48
    11.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • tonyshowoffT
      tonyshowoff @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @tonyshowoff said:

      I know that officially Debian still uses the term "GNU/Linux" for some reason, but most people can't even pronounce their name correctly, so I think they focus on the wrong thing anyway -- it's a contraction of "Debra" and "Ian" so it's no more "Deebian" than Linux is "Lighnux."

      I've actually never heard that spoken any way except for Deb-Ian. But I can see where people not knowing what it was would find a different way to pronounce it.

      Well, as a non-native English speaker, I'm not a big stickler about that kind of thing. It just seems to me they'd want people to say their name first for business reasons, before worrying about something as mundane and uninteresting to business as "GNU."

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @tonyshowoff
        last edited by

        @tonyshowoff said:

        Well, as a non-native English speaker, I'm not a big stickler about that kind of thing. It just seems to me they'd want people to say their name first for business reasons, before worrying about something as mundane and uninteresting to business as "GNU."

        There is no business there. That's the same crowd as the GNU people. Some weird hippy fringe, not production systems people.

        tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • tonyshowoffT
          tonyshowoff @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @tonyshowoff said:

          Well, as a non-native English speaker, I'm not a big stickler about that kind of thing. It just seems to me they'd want people to say their name first for business reasons, before worrying about something as mundane and uninteresting to business as "GNU."

          There is no business there. That's the same crowd as the GNU people. Some weird hippy fringe, not production systems people.

          More business than any business GNU could have, after all, Debian is semi-popular for "the cloud," but nobody on Earth uses GNU with the Linux kernel, not even Stallman.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stacksofplatesS
            stacksofplates
            last edited by stacksofplates

            You mean you guys don't use these GNU/Linux distributions?

            https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html


            "GNU/Linux is used by millions, though many call it “Linux” by mistake."

            AHHHHH

            0_1458697613556_giphy.gif

            tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • tonyshowoffT
              tonyshowoff @stacksofplates
              last edited by

              @johnhooks If it's GNU/Linux then it's also Zend/Wordpress. I hope one day we can all live in a world where the GNU toolchain no longer matters at all, and it's actually pretty close.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • stacksofplatesS
                stacksofplates
                last edited by stacksofplates

                @tonyshowoff

                the quote on your site:

                with this model there would no need for publishers at all. All profits would go to developers, the people who deserve the money and did the work. No need to spend on marketing or distribution either, ergo no need for publisher.

                Ha he sounds like every single minimum wage worker. "The CEO doesn't do any work", "those 'Fat Cat' executives that just sit in their offices while we do all of the hard work"

                Also, if you don't spend money on marketing or distribution, how the eff do people find out about your software? Am I the only one that doesn't comb through GitHub every morning when I wake up to find new free open source software?

                tonyshowoffT DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Yup, just you. that's what I do all morning, comb GitHub.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • tonyshowoffT
                    tonyshowoff @stacksofplates
                    last edited by

                    @johnhooks said:

                    @tonyshowoff

                    the quote on your site:

                    with this model there would no need for publishers at all. All profits would go to developers, the people who deserve the money and did the work. No need to spend on marketing or distribution either, ergo no need for publisher.

                    Ha he sounds like every single minimum wage worker. "The CEO doesn't do any work", "those 'Fat Cat' executives that just sit in their offices while we do all of the hard work"

                    Also, if you don't spend money on marketing or distribution, how the eff do people find out about your software? Am I the only one that doesn't comb through GitHub every morning when I wake up to find new free open source software?

                    Well as I pointed out they don't really think about things like that, my guess is they've either never had a real job, or never had to struggle with a low paying job (possibly also academic). And yes, I also see the latest free and open source stuff out there, and steal tons of ideas too.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      The never had a real job thing is big. Tons of those people don't have any clue where work is done or who is putting in effort.

                      dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @stacksofplates
                        last edited by

                        @johnhooks said:

                        @tonyshowoff

                        the quote on your site:

                        with this model there would no need for publishers at all. All profits would go to developers, the people who deserve the money and did the work. No need to spend on marketing or distribution either, ergo no need for publisher.

                        Ha he sounds like every single minimum wage worker. "The CEO doesn't do any work", "those 'Fat Cat' executives that just sit in their offices while we do all of the hard work"

                        Also, if you don't spend money on marketing or distribution, how the eff do people find out about your software? Am I the only one that doesn't comb through GitHub every morning when I wake up to find new free open source software?

                        Seriously I've never done that, not once! I've gone to a few direct links.. 😛

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • bbigfordB
                          bbigford @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by bbigford

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          Yeah, the GNU/Linux people seem to have died off long ago. It was one of those big trends once upon a time.

                          Richard Stallman died off? .... (joke)

                          I swear, in EVERY conversation I've heard him engage, he spins the conversation into the naming (GNU/Linux... NOT Linux). I think in the flick Revolution OS he talked about it no less than 60 times.

                          tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • tonyshowoffT
                            tonyshowoff @bbigford
                            last edited by

                            @BBigford said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            Yeah, the GNU/Linux people seem to have died off long ago. It was one of those big trends once upon a time.

                            Richard Stallman died off? .... (joke)

                            I swear, in EVERY conversation I've heard him engage, he spins the conversation into the naming (GNU/Linux... NOT Linux). I think in the flick Revolution OS he talked about it no less than 60 times.

                            That movie also hinted at what a total psycho Eric S Raymond also is with his bizarre explosive behaviour. He's also pretty... pretty extremely sexist and actually not even really that technical, he's more like Stallman. What I do like is him complaining about Stallman, sometimes it's pretty funny what he writes and calls him out on.

                            bbigfordB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • dafyreD
                              dafyre @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              Tons of those people don't have any clue where work is done or who is putting in effort.

                              Or the different kinds of effort required. The Marketing guys will have to put forth a whole different effort than the devs in the back corner, or the C-Level Suits at the top of the food chain.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • bbigfordB
                                bbigford @tonyshowoff
                                last edited by

                                @tonyshowoff said:

                                @BBigford said:

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                Yeah, the GNU/Linux people seem to have died off long ago. It was one of those big trends once upon a time.

                                Richard Stallman died off? .... (joke)

                                I swear, in EVERY conversation I've heard him engage, he spins the conversation into the naming (GNU/Linux... NOT Linux). I think in the flick Revolution OS he talked about it no less than 60 times.

                                That movie also hinted at what a total psycho Eric S Raymond also is with his bizarre explosive behaviour. He's also pretty... pretty extremely sexist and actually not even really that technical, he's more like Stallman. What I do like is him complaining about Stallman, sometimes it's pretty funny what he writes and calls him out on.

                                I don't remember him being explosive in that movie. Got any examples to refresh my memory?

                                tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • tonyshowoffT
                                  tonyshowoff @bbigford
                                  last edited by

                                  @BBigford said:

                                  @tonyshowoff said:

                                  @BBigford said:

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  Yeah, the GNU/Linux people seem to have died off long ago. It was one of those big trends once upon a time.

                                  Richard Stallman died off? .... (joke)

                                  I swear, in EVERY conversation I've heard him engage, he spins the conversation into the naming (GNU/Linux... NOT Linux). I think in the flick Revolution OS he talked about it no less than 60 times.

                                  That movie also hinted at what a total psycho Eric S Raymond also is with his bizarre explosive behaviour. He's also pretty... pretty extremely sexist and actually not even really that technical, he's more like Stallman. What I do like is him complaining about Stallman, sometimes it's pretty funny what he writes and calls him out on.

                                  I don't remember him being explosive in that movie. Got any examples to refresh my memory?

                                  Well when the interviewer brings up that some people compare open source to communism, something that actually almost never happens in real life, his face turns bright red, he flips out and gives a very 1950s ice America view of life under Marxism. As someone from such a country, it was really strange. It did seem like he was trying to restrain himself.

                                  coliverC bbigfordB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • coliverC
                                    coliver @tonyshowoff
                                    last edited by

                                    @tonyshowoff said:

                                    @BBigford said:

                                    @tonyshowoff said:

                                    @BBigford said:

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    Yeah, the GNU/Linux people seem to have died off long ago. It was one of those big trends once upon a time.

                                    Richard Stallman died off? .... (joke)

                                    I swear, in EVERY conversation I've heard him engage, he spins the conversation into the naming (GNU/Linux... NOT Linux). I think in the flick Revolution OS he talked about it no less than 60 times.

                                    That movie also hinted at what a total psycho Eric S Raymond also is with his bizarre explosive behaviour. He's also pretty... pretty extremely sexist and actually not even really that technical, he's more like Stallman. What I do like is him complaining about Stallman, sometimes it's pretty funny what he writes and calls him out on.

                                    I don't remember him being explosive in that movie. Got any examples to refresh my memory?

                                    Well when the interviewer brings up that some people compare open source to communism, something that actually almost never happens in real life, his face turns bright red, he flips out and gives a very 1950s ice America view of life under Marxism. As someone from such a country, it was really strange. It did seem like he was trying to restrain himself.

                                    American propaganda at its best.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • bbigfordB
                                      bbigford @tonyshowoff
                                      last edited by

                                      @tonyshowoff said:

                                      @BBigford said:

                                      @tonyshowoff said:

                                      @BBigford said:

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      Yeah, the GNU/Linux people seem to have died off long ago. It was one of those big trends once upon a time.

                                      Richard Stallman died off? .... (joke)

                                      I swear, in EVERY conversation I've heard him engage, he spins the conversation into the naming (GNU/Linux... NOT Linux). I think in the flick Revolution OS he talked about it no less than 60 times.

                                      That movie also hinted at what a total psycho Eric S Raymond also is with his bizarre explosive behaviour. He's also pretty... pretty extremely sexist and actually not even really that technical, he's more like Stallman. What I do like is him complaining about Stallman, sometimes it's pretty funny what he writes and calls him out on.

                                      I don't remember him being explosive in that movie. Got any examples to refresh my memory?

                                      Well when the interviewer brings up that some people compare open source to communism, something that actually almost never happens in real life, his face turns bright red, he flips out and gives a very 1950s ice America view of life under Marxism. As someone from such a country, it was really strange. It did seem like he was trying to restrain himself.

                                      Haha I forgot about some of those lines. Thanks for the refresh. Been a while since I've watched that flick.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 3
                                      • 3 / 3
                                      • First post
                                        Last post