Fundamental Difference in the Mindset for Updates of Linux vs. Windows Admins
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Ya, a 5 person shop probably won't need custom software. That's the only reason why I said that.
Hmmm... I wonder if statistically that is true. I've worked with one person shops (I kid you not) that needed that "special one off software" before. I actually think it is the smaller ones that have the problem more rather than the other way around because if you are big enough you simply don't put up with it - you shop around or make your own.
It probably depends on the business too. Obviously tech start ups write their own stuff. But small generic shops can get away with things like Wave or other free accounting solutions, things like that.
-
@Jason said:
Maybe we are different but we are usually updating as fast as possible. We even had a group of people outside of IT on windows 10 before it was released.
Enterprises tend to be more like that. Although I've seen enterprises lingering for a decade on something old too (like Vista.)
-
And then people say things like this:
With Microsoft I feel more confident that they are going to take security more seriously because they have a vested interest in making their product secure. Yes I know there are plenty of examples where their security was lacking, but when something breaks or a hole is found it's in their best interest to fix it. And if I have a problem with something I have someone to call.
That's from a post on SW called "Why use Linux in 2016?"
-
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
The without an investment is not true. There is user training, finding comparable apps and deploying OS and said apps. Those things aren't free.
True, they are relatively free, however. Keeping Windows up to date has the same costs over time. This is a common myth that people point to to keep people from moving off of Windows. But if you watch the real world, Linux can, in some cases, actually lower the cost there. It's not uncommon for the pain of moving to Linux to be lower than the pain of updating Windows. And no matter how much someone avoids updating Windows, it has to happen at some point. And all that "cost" of the Linux move bites you regardless.
And, in fact, the more that rolling updates are avoided on windows, the more costly and painful that becomes as the changes are not small, they are disruptive.
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
Maybe - but what seems more likely is the need to have one written. Not just finding an off the shelf product already ready to go.
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
Most of our vertical applications are written in house (which has allowed us to update quicker than many others as we don't rely on vendors to keep them updated) but, from what I've been told from developers it's pretty easy to change the code to get it to work natievely in linux.
-
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
The without an investment is not true. There is user training, finding comparable apps and deploying OS and said apps. Those things aren't free.
True, they are relatively free, however. Keeping Windows up to date has the same costs over time. This is a common myth that people point to to keep people from moving off of Windows. But if you watch the real world, Linux can, in some cases, actually lower the cost there. It's not uncommon for the pain of moving to Linux to be lower than the pain of updating Windows. And no matter how much someone avoids updating Windows, it has to happen at some point. And all that "cost" of the Linux move bites you regardless.
And, in fact, the more that rolling updates are avoided on windows, the more costly and painful that becomes as the changes are not small, they are disruptive.
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
Maybe - but what seems more likely is the need to have one written. Not just finding an off the shelf product already ready to go.
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
Most of our vertical applications are written in house (which has allowed us to update quicker than many others as we don't rely on vendors to keep them updated) but, from what I've been told from developers it's pretty easy to change the code to get it to work natievely in linux.
If well written, rarely is it a big deal to move over. In fact, if really well written, it's normally zero effort at all. It often takes more effort to lock something into a platform! Which makes it all the more amazing that it happens so often.
-
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
The without an investment is not true. There is user training, finding comparable apps and deploying OS and said apps. Those things aren't free.
True, they are relatively free, however. Keeping Windows up to date has the same costs over time. This is a common myth that people point to to keep people from moving off of Windows. But if you watch the real world, Linux can, in some cases, actually lower the cost there. It's not uncommon for the pain of moving to Linux to be lower than the pain of updating Windows. And no matter how much someone avoids updating Windows, it has to happen at some point. And all that "cost" of the Linux move bites you regardless.
And, in fact, the more that rolling updates are avoided on windows, the more costly and painful that becomes as the changes are not small, they are disruptive.
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
Maybe - but what seems more likely is the need to have one written. Not just finding an off the shelf product already ready to go.
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
Most of our vertical applications are written in house (which has allowed us to update quicker than many others as we don't rely on vendors to keep them updated) but, from what I've been told from developers it's pretty easy to change the code to get it to work natievely in linux.
that's great - sadly frequently this is not the case - like the 90's - so many companies made intranet sites completely in .net and it only worked in IE. And amazingly those companies have not converted so much of that code, even today.
-
@Dashrender said:
that's great - sadly frequently this is not the case - like the 90's - so many companies made intranet sites completely in .net and it only worked in IE. And amazingly those companies have not converted so much of that code, even today.
Actually if you used .NET as MS said you should, you'd not have any lock in, not even on the back end most of the time. .NET runs mostly on Linux (sometimes better than on Windows) and MS is dedicated to getting it to be fully cross platform. MS was pushing for good designs around neutrality for this even in the 1990s before .NET was created.
-
Was is ASP then that was locked in?
-
@Dashrender said:
Was is ASP then that was locked in?
ASP was locked in on the server size, more or less, because no one was making JScript or VBScript server side engines except for Microsoft. But the resulting product wasn't locked in. NTG started life making ASP DNA applications (cloud as the cool kids call it now) and we didn't have to worry about end point lock in, even in the 1990s there wasn't any intrinsic result like that.
-
You can run ASP on Linux today with Apache-ASP, however the languages that were common on Windows were never ported (because they sucked like nobody's business) so you have recode in Perl.
-
Here is one reason folks don't like Windows updates...
http://lifehacker.com/windows-10-updates-are-deleting-some-apps-without-notif-1762347989
-
@dafyre said:
Here is one reason folks don't like Windows updates...
http://lifehacker.com/windows-10-updates-are-deleting-some-apps-without-notif-1762347989
There was an update last year around July or August that broke SolidWork's equation abilities.
-
@dafyre said:
Here is one reason folks don't like Windows updates...
http://lifehacker.com/windows-10-updates-are-deleting-some-apps-without-notif-1762347989
While this is definitely a hugely bad thing, even if the app doesn't work any longer (hell if they can remove it, they can pop up a box telling you that it's incompatible) they should just leave it there to fail upon launching. But a notification that this installed version has known problems would be the best solution.
This is still not a reason to not update. Being up to date to dodge the bullets of Zero Day and near ZD exploits to me is more important than these tools that are being uninstalled.
Now broken apps by updates - sadly those happen from time to time. And more often than not it's because the App Devs did something non standard to solve a problem they had.
Early last year, nearly every DICOM reading software out there required an update/upgrade because Microsoft fixed a flaw/bug in a DLL that those vendors were all exploiting, instead of doing the right thing in the first place. I'm guessing millions of dollars were spent having to purchase upgrades that otherwise wouldn't have been needed (frankly the vendors should have give the software away - but that's just my opinion) had they done their job correctly in the first place.
-
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
-
@johnhooks said:
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
TL:DR - I am a Windows admin who get's defensive when someone points out a flaw in my operating system. Then I rip apart the features I don't like (even though they are often easier and faster to use).
-
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
TL:DR - I am a Windows admin who get's defensive when someone points out a flaw in my operating system. Then I rip apart the features I don't like (even though they are often easier and faster to use).
Ya I can't believe I read the whole thing.
-
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
TL:DR - I am a Windows admin who get's defensive when someone points out a flaw in my operating system. Then I rip apart the features I don't like (even though they are often easier and faster to use).
Ya I can't believe I read the whole thing.
Ditto - damn - what a twat. LOL
-
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
TL:DR - I am a Windows admin who get's defensive when someone points out a flaw in my operating system. Then I rip apart the features I don't like (even though they are often easier and faster to use).
Ya I can't believe I read the whole thing.
Ditto - damn - want twat. LOL
Uh.... that may be a bit personal.
-
@coliver said:
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
TL:DR - I am a Windows admin who get's defensive when someone points out a flaw in my operating system. Then I rip apart the features I don't like (even though they are often easier and faster to use).
Ya I can't believe I read the whole thing.
Ditto - damn - want twat. LOL
Uh.... that may be a bit personal.
hahahahahha
-
@coliver said:
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@coliver said:
@johnhooks said:
Ok. 35 years in IT. I don't even know what to say.....
I agree, 35+ years in this and it was the Unix clan that had a chance and never delivered on a single unified desktop/server FOR THE MASSES. Stupid names, gurus that hold on to CLI stuff like the guy in lord of the rings. Arrogance has always played the role. Bill Gates did one thing the unix clan couldn't or didn't want to pull off STANDARDS. I hate GREP, VEDIT blah blah blah. FILE EDIT HELP on menu is what did it in simple windows after we climbed out of DOS hell. I will never for get Visual Basic put butt kick on C when V3 came out I loved it! C arrogance from Unix Arrogance was hating it. My own brother laughed when should him Windows while he was living in DOS and said it would never fly, what and idiot. Now Ubuntu (which I love and CentOS) has the BASIC WINDOWS keys because they HAD to, they still use stupid dumb unrelated to the application names and still don't get it. No, What PHPAdmin do? PHP management? NO MYSQL! Why no MySQLAdmin WOW a miracle, stupid names again and again. Consistent Windows Features like CONTROL PANEL, DHCP Manager, DNS Manager on and on are ALL available and improving with each version. A windows 2012 server with Hyper-V and RDS, ready to go. I throw a windows machine on my network, I can RDP to it and manage it. Why doesn't UBUNTU let me join it to Windows Network have RDP enabled so I can use it more I would get hooked. BUT NOOooooo Again, arrogant person somewhere made the decision not to and yes I can load it and join after spending an hour or so.. I know just built one. I love the fact Ubuntu has grown up to be like Windows with Unix in the back and I can load it off one disk on a computer where windows 10 would let the sound work but everything worked on Unbuntu. But I cant RDP to I it yet and I don't want to mess with it, because if I do I will put Windows 7 on it if needed which works great as well. Linux is cheap, MySQL can go up to bat with MSSQL and cheaper and no that they have GUI you can manage them. But what happens, you work somewhere there is an Arrogant Linux idiot that strips shells off everything wants to run Windows CORE because HE loves it, more efficient which is marginal with out the GUI and is always using CLI on his machine. I had years of CLI I know the benefits I also hated the BS hassle and wasted time it caused on many levels. File Explorer was heaven sent along with the Browser, for Gopher and Lynx what a joke. MSSQL Manager and Windows Server Tools are easy use, find and manage and easy to teach others. While UNIX community continued to trat users like idiots and laughed they stop after MILLIONS were using a new platform they didn't know much about. Phones ALSO proved GUI and Metro apps are they way to go just like WINDOWS proved years earlier. I hope Ubuntu and other clones of it keep going, UNIX had the power, it just had to have a bunch less selfish people get it to the public. MAC will hang on to about 11% of the market for being closed systems and its a great platform. Linux, not counting headless Back end servers will be about 7%. People still trust and know how to buy and run windows and everyone can use it. Linux still hasn't got that trust from the average person or gurus. Yes lots of us in the work force will have to work and tolerate it but that is about as far as it goes for now.
TL:DR - I am a Windows admin who get's defensive when someone points out a flaw in my operating system. Then I rip apart the features I don't like (even though they are often easier and faster to use).
Ya I can't believe I read the whole thing.
Ditto - damn - want twat. LOL
Uh.... that may be a bit personal.
damn it.. type o... but I think you got what I was going for. Sorry if it offended you.
