Fundamental Difference in the Mindset for Updates of Linux vs. Windows Admins
-
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@gjacobse said:
In the regard of licenses it doesn't. It's the physical ability to use the add-ons and such.
But the license is the sole different between Office 2013 and Office 365.
No. A user with Office 365 now is getting the Office 2016 local apps, not 2013.
@gjacobse Worded his statement poorly. The problem is that Office 2016 does not support some add-in that does work with Office 2013.
Oh okay, that makes sense. I thought that he was saying that one 2013 install worked and one did not.
-
@Dashrender said:
Oh sure - I'll give you that. Definitely an interesting look. So you're looking to move from Windows X - should you even stay on Window? Should you move to something else? Linux? Maybe. Now is kinda of a unique situation. MS is giving Windows 10 away for free. If you are considering moving to Windows 10 like I am.. what Scott is saying is that I should be asking - should I be moving to Linux instead?
Correct. In a way I would say that you should always be asking that. And, likewise, you should be asking if you should be moving to Windows if you are a Linux shop. Basically, I believe that you should always be considering what is the best option going forward.
Now, that being said, you can't spend every moment of every day considering every possibility. That would be overwhelming. So we tend to stop when something triggers us and look at those times. So when doing an update or when considering one is a perfect time to not just casually run scenarios in your head but to really evaluate if the cost of the move to Windows 10 might not be better served moving to Linux.
Sure, since Windows 10 is free and you are likely coming from something relatively similar to it (rather than Windows XP) Windows 10 has a lot of a lead on any given Linux solution. But it is always worth asking the question. It's never good to go with a solution just because there is momentum, that's how we drive off of the cliff.
-
@Dashrender said:
So now I have to put a test together to see if my uses could do all of their daily jobs from a Linux system.
It's a good exercise, if nothing else. I've tried it before and gone back to Windows. But tried it again and stuck on Linux. Having just one person on Linux will introduce certain types of overhead, but it will also break the "everything has to be one way" condition, too. There are benefits all three ways (all Windows, all Linux and hybrid.)
-
@johnhooks said:
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
That's a great point. So often the software is chosen because "we already paid for it, we can't afford to move" then we get the "argh, this Windows stuff is SO expensive." Well, if you hadn't done the first thing and committed to the expensive Windows platform we might have solved that other problem (maybe.)
The expensive software world often remains the expensive software world. What incentive is there for a third party vendor to make cheap software for Windows when they know that their customers were already willing to spend lots of money on Windows. Few companies want to give software away for free when their customers are happily paying someone else already. But if they are getting their OS for free, it makes more sense to at least consider being more price conscious. Doesn't mean that they will be, but there is at least more incentive. It's why Linux isn't just free, it's ecosystem is free. Sure lots of free things are available on Windows too, but a large number of the best ones come from Linux and get better support there and only make it to Windows as a "well we already made it, might as well make it for them, too."
-
@Dashrender said:
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
I hear this a lot. But no company that I've ever worked with has had this as an actual limitation. I'm not saying that it is never true, but the feeling that I have is that it is fractionally as true as often as people claim it. I feel like this is one of those "it's socially acceptable to make this excuse" situations where we often just give companies a pass if they state this and never press them further even though it goes against the common sense of business that there would be an amazing gap in the marketplace with a fortune and no one has filled it or is trying to fill it.
Do you know specifically what product this is?
Also, Wine may solve this, you never know.
-
@Dashrender said:
It's hard to say without putting pen to paper to know which would be cheaper (Linux with either custom app or RDS/VDI solution, or run Windows on the desktop).
Sometimes the numbers are close, sometimes they are wildly all over the place. There is both the cost today and the cost tomorrow. Once you start breaking with the investment in technical debt you will generally have a long term improvement in cost even if you don't get it up front. Because when time does come to replace any given piece with something new, you will have broken the "well since we are already stuck on Windows, we don't care that we are stuck with it for another reason" problem that plagues so many companies.
One of the things that kept and keeps NTG nimble is that I tend to put my foot down about any technology that would mean investing in a lack of agility. Even if something seems ideal for us, if it requires us to suddenly be locked into things we don't want to be locked into that's a huge negative and requires a lot of value to overcome. Over the years we've had lock in issues, but we have organizationally fought it and by and large are platform agnostic and free to implement what makes the most sense for us at all times.
-
@johnhooks said:
Ya if you're a 5 person shop it probably won't save much. But if you've got 200-500 desktops that's enough to have a decent custom solution.
Although changing two people generally costs very little, too.
-
I was getting ready to write a couple of posts before I read to the end of the thread... I am glad I waited, lol.
WINE has gotten to the point now where, I think it is becoming quite a viable alternative to running Windows Apps in Linux. I find that some Games actually play better under Linux than under Windows. (And to be fair, there are others that simply don't work at all).
I know some versions of Office, as well as Adobe products have been made to work under Linux/Wine as well.
It might be worth fiddling with a little bit, and testing out to see how feasible such a switch might actually be. Especially if you are having to support old applications on newer computers.
Also, PlayOnLinux works with all apps, not just games... and it makes some of the initial setup and testing with WINE a bit less of a pain.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Ya if you're a 5 person shop it probably won't save much. But if you've got 200-500 desktops that's enough to have a decent custom solution.
Although changing two people generally costs very little, too.
Ya, a 5 person shop probably won't need custom software. That's the only reason why I said that.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
I hear this a lot. But no company that I've ever worked with has had this as an actual limitation. I'm not saying that it is never true, but the feeling that I have is that it is fractionally as true as often as people claim it. I feel like this is one of those "it's socially acceptable to make this excuse" situations where we often just give companies a pass if they state this and never press them further even though it goes against the common sense of business that there would be an amazing gap in the marketplace with a fortune and no one has filled it or is trying to fill it.
Do you know specifically what product this is?
Also, Wine may solve this, you never know.
I didn't say anything but I have a hard time believing that there isn't a web based HVAC quoting system that could do this.
-
@johnhooks said:
Ya, a 5 person shop probably won't need custom software. That's the only reason why I said that.
Hmmm... I wonder if statistically that is true. I've worked with one person shops (I kid you not) that needed that "special one off software" before. I actually think it is the smaller ones that have the problem more rather than the other way around because if you are big enough you simply don't put up with it - you shop around or make your own.
-
Maybe we are different but we are usually updating as fast as possible. We even had a group of people outside of IT on windows 10 before it was released.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Ya, a 5 person shop probably won't need custom software. That's the only reason why I said that.
Hmmm... I wonder if statistically that is true. I've worked with one person shops (I kid you not) that needed that "special one off software" before. I actually think it is the smaller ones that have the problem more rather than the other way around because if you are big enough you simply don't put up with it - you shop around or make your own.
It probably depends on the business too. Obviously tech start ups write their own stuff. But small generic shops can get away with things like Wave or other free accounting solutions, things like that.
-
@Jason said:
Maybe we are different but we are usually updating as fast as possible. We even had a group of people outside of IT on windows 10 before it was released.
Enterprises tend to be more like that. Although I've seen enterprises lingering for a decade on something old too (like Vista.)
-
And then people say things like this:
With Microsoft I feel more confident that they are going to take security more seriously because they have a vested interest in making their product secure. Yes I know there are plenty of examples where their security was lacking, but when something breaks or a hole is found it's in their best interest to fix it. And if I have a problem with something I have someone to call.
That's from a post on SW called "Why use Linux in 2016?"
-
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
The without an investment is not true. There is user training, finding comparable apps and deploying OS and said apps. Those things aren't free.
True, they are relatively free, however. Keeping Windows up to date has the same costs over time. This is a common myth that people point to to keep people from moving off of Windows. But if you watch the real world, Linux can, in some cases, actually lower the cost there. It's not uncommon for the pain of moving to Linux to be lower than the pain of updating Windows. And no matter how much someone avoids updating Windows, it has to happen at some point. And all that "cost" of the Linux move bites you regardless.
And, in fact, the more that rolling updates are avoided on windows, the more costly and painful that becomes as the changes are not small, they are disruptive.
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
Maybe - but what seems more likely is the need to have one written. Not just finding an off the shelf product already ready to go.
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
Most of our vertical applications are written in house (which has allowed us to update quicker than many others as we don't rely on vendors to keep them updated) but, from what I've been told from developers it's pretty easy to change the code to get it to work natievely in linux.
-
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
The without an investment is not true. There is user training, finding comparable apps and deploying OS and said apps. Those things aren't free.
True, they are relatively free, however. Keeping Windows up to date has the same costs over time. This is a common myth that people point to to keep people from moving off of Windows. But if you watch the real world, Linux can, in some cases, actually lower the cost there. It's not uncommon for the pain of moving to Linux to be lower than the pain of updating Windows. And no matter how much someone avoids updating Windows, it has to happen at some point. And all that "cost" of the Linux move bites you regardless.
And, in fact, the more that rolling updates are avoided on windows, the more costly and painful that becomes as the changes are not small, they are disruptive.
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
Maybe - but what seems more likely is the need to have one written. Not just finding an off the shelf product already ready to go.
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
Most of our vertical applications are written in house (which has allowed us to update quicker than many others as we don't rely on vendors to keep them updated) but, from what I've been told from developers it's pretty easy to change the code to get it to work natievely in linux.
If well written, rarely is it a big deal to move over. In fact, if really well written, it's normally zero effort at all. It often takes more effort to lock something into a platform! Which makes it all the more amazing that it happens so often.
-
@Jason said:
@Dashrender said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
The without an investment is not true. There is user training, finding comparable apps and deploying OS and said apps. Those things aren't free.
True, they are relatively free, however. Keeping Windows up to date has the same costs over time. This is a common myth that people point to to keep people from moving off of Windows. But if you watch the real world, Linux can, in some cases, actually lower the cost there. It's not uncommon for the pain of moving to Linux to be lower than the pain of updating Windows. And no matter how much someone avoids updating Windows, it has to happen at some point. And all that "cost" of the Linux move bites you regardless.
And, in fact, the more that rolling updates are avoided on windows, the more costly and painful that becomes as the changes are not small, they are disruptive.
I would like to bet that the savings in licensing and maintenance will allow places to purchase real cross platform software solutions.
Maybe - but what seems more likely is the need to have one written. Not just finding an off the shelf product already ready to go.
An example. I have a client that is a distributor for HVAC systems. They have a quoting tool that only works on Windows. This tool has all of the information needed to make quotes for the things they sell. To the best of the clients knowledge, there is no other tool like it. So if they wanted to move to Linux, they would either have to use RDS or VDI to provide access to that tool, or they would have to have a custom application written for them.
Most of our vertical applications are written in house (which has allowed us to update quicker than many others as we don't rely on vendors to keep them updated) but, from what I've been told from developers it's pretty easy to change the code to get it to work natievely in linux.
that's great - sadly frequently this is not the case - like the 90's - so many companies made intranet sites completely in .net and it only worked in IE. And amazingly those companies have not converted so much of that code, even today.
-
@Dashrender said:
that's great - sadly frequently this is not the case - like the 90's - so many companies made intranet sites completely in .net and it only worked in IE. And amazingly those companies have not converted so much of that code, even today.
Actually if you used .NET as MS said you should, you'd not have any lock in, not even on the back end most of the time. .NET runs mostly on Linux (sometimes better than on Windows) and MS is dedicated to getting it to be fully cross platform. MS was pushing for good designs around neutrality for this even in the 1990s before .NET was created.
-
Was is ASP then that was locked in?
