ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CentOS 7 Minimal - differing distrobutions

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    centoscentos 7centos 7.21511distro
    12 Posts 5 Posters 2.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @DustinB3403
      last edited by

      @DustinB3403 said:

      What is different between those without the 1511 tag, and those with?

      The non tagged is the monthly rolling updated ISO.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403
        last edited by

        Ah.

        I didn't know that.

        travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • travisdh1T
          travisdh1 @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @DustinB3403 said:

          Ah.

          I didn't know that.

          After running an update it should end up exactly the same.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @travisdh1
            last edited by JaredBusch

            @travisdh1 said:

            @DustinB3403 said:

            Ah.

            I didn't know that.

            After running an update it should end up exactly the same.

            That is not my issue

            This is my issue. Differences in the base installed packages.

            We had a whole thread (or section of a thread) on this subject a while back because in 1511 firewalld was not installed by default.

            Last login: Tue Mar  1 15:16:39 2016
            [root@localhost ~]# yum install firewalld
            Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
            base                                                                                           | 3.6 kB  00:00:00
            extras                                                                                         | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
            updates                                                                                        | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
            (1/4): extras/7/x86_64/primary_db                                                              | 101 kB  00:00:01
            (2/4): base/7/x86_64/group_gz                                                                  | 155 kB  00:00:01
            (3/4): updates/7/x86_64/primary_db                                                             | 3.1 MB  00:00:03
            (4/4): base/7/x86_64/primary_db                                                                | 5.3 MB  00:00:07
            Determining fastest mirrors
             * base: centos.mbni.med.umich.edu
             * extras: mirrors.gigenet.com
             * updates: mirror.nexcess.net
            Package firewalld-0.3.9-14.el7.noarch already installed and latest version
            Nothing to do
            [root@localhost ~]#
            
            travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              What the heck. Argh. This is not a good way for them to handle this.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • travisdh1T
                travisdh1 @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch Ah yes, I forgot about that one. Guess I've spoiled myself by using a base image for 90% of the stuff I roll out now.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  Alex Sage
                  last edited by

                  Did this start before or after CentOS came back in house? 😉

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                    last edited by

                    @aaronstuder said:

                    Did this start before or after CentOS came back in house? 😉

                    I don't understand the question. Or the wink.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by Alex Sage

                      @scottalanmiller Didn't Red Hat take Centos back in house?

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                        last edited by

                        @aaronstuder said:

                        @scottalanmiller Didn't Red Hat take Centos back in house?

                        That's a weird way to say it. "Back" would imply that they used to be in house. CentOS was a third party and Red Hat bought them.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post