Backup File Server to DAS
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Danp said:
Unitrends 9.0 is supposed to support all major hypervisors, including XenServer. It's currently undergoing beta testing...
Even KVM?
Nope
Unitrends 9.0 includes protection for all three major Hypervisors, vSphere from VMWare, Hyper-V for Microsoft and XenServer from Citrix.
Is XenServer still from Citrix I thought the Xen Foundation took it over?
So not all major. LOL
Xen IS Linux Foundation. XenServer is Citrix "when using that name" but it is just a rebranding of the XCP from Linux Foundation. Citrix makes extra tools but not Xen or XenServer.
Now I'm lost again - so XenServer is Citrix, but do people still install XenServer? or just Xen? Like @coliver I thought Citrix gave their code/project back to the Linux Foundation... is that not the case?
XenServer is a brand name that Citrix slaps on XCP. XCP is made by Linux, XenServer is provided by Citrix. Citrix makes nothing that anyone uses.
-
Here is the site for the Linux Foundation managed version. http://xenproject.org/
-
OK, I think - so did @DustinB3403 install Xen or XenServer?
-
XenServer 6.5 from the linux foundation.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
XenServer 6.5 from the linux foundation.
and I'm back to being confused.
@scottalanmiller said:
XenServer is a brand name that Citrix slaps on XCP. XCP is made by Linux, XenServer is provided by Citrix. Citrix makes nothing that anyone uses.
Does this not mean that XenServer is Citrix, but then Scott says no one uses anything Citrix makes.
-
So you can download a packaged solution for free of charge from Citrix, this includes XenServer 6.5 and XenCenter. The closed source management interface for XenCenter.
You can download an unpacked version from the Linux Foundation which doesn't include XenCenter.
-
Help me understand why you would download a Citrix own thing from the Linux Foundation instead of Citrix? XenServer, according to Scott belongs to Citrix.
-
I feel like I'm missing some super simple here, but just can't grasp it.
-
Which if you're downloading from xenproject.org you're downloading Xen. Not XenServer.
Its a branded solution for the Xen project.
-
OK the first line of the link @coliver posted above reads
XenServer is an open source project and community managed by Citrix
What does managed by Citrix mean? Does that mean they own it, but have GPL'ed it or Open Sourced it (different license than GPL) so anyone can use it anyway they want, but Citrix still owns it?
Damn that's a mind bender.
-
OK So lets go back to the basics.
Citrix developed XenServer originally, but made it open source and donated the project to the Linux Foundation, they called it "Xen Project". So now there are 2 projects, Xen (Linux Foundation) and XenServer (Citrix Backed Version). Both offer an almost identical platform, except the management interface. Which is owned and privately developed by Citrix.
-
anyone know a free backup solution for XenServer
something like veeam lol -
It looks like XenServer updated their Dom0 to CentOS 7.... I am really far behind now.
-
@IT-ADMIN said:
anyone know a free backup solution for XenServer
something like veeam lolNAUBackup will create fully restorable Backup Images of your VM's and push them off host for free. I use NAU and it works perfectly for what I need.
Otherwise you have StorageCraft or Unitrends are your options
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@IT-ADMIN said:
anyone know a free backup solution for XenServer
something like veeam lolNAUBackup will create fully restorable Backup Images of your VM's and push them off host for free. I use NAU and it works perfectly for what I need.
Otherwise you have StorageCraft or Unitrends are your options
NAU backup only exports full backups though. You don't get the incremental backups like you do with Veeam Endpoint Recovery (although with Veeam you have to install it on each VM)
-
@dafyre I did say fulls...
-
@DustinB3403 I misread what you wrote. My fault!
-
with veeam endpoint backup, i no longer see the benefit of virtualization, since i can backup the system image in a network share then it is fully safe, i can restore the system in matter of minutes,
i'm i right ?? -
@IT-ADMIN You'd be wrong to think that virtualization is trivialized. By virtualizing you enable recovery and backup to be much simpler than a restore to bare metal.
You have the hardware abstraction layer that means you can take a VM from completely different hardware and put it onto something else.
With direct bare metal restore you'd have to deal with the hardware.
-
The benefit of virtualization is savings on management time, hardware cost, power, and cooling, etc. Do you REALLY want to have to restore from a backup every time a physical machine blows out a hard drive or suffers from some other catastrophic failure?
Do you really want to be paying the Power bill for running 30 servers with 2 x 750 watt Power supplies each?
The list could go on...
