ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Simple E-Mail Retention Policy

    IT Discussion
    9
    66
    20.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Deleted74295D
      Deleted74295 Banned @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said:

      There is a good chance you would have to.

      Umm, why? 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
        last edited by

        @Breffni-Potter said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        It's you who decided to keep records, I suppose.

        That's akin to suggesting because I have a warehouse of 1000 DVD players which they want to check, I have to pay them for their time to check it.

        Yup, that's why you don't keep a warehouse of DVDs if that's the risk and you have no value to storing them 🙂

        Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Deleted74295D
          Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          Yup, that's why you don't keep a warehouse of DVDs if that's the risk and you have no value to storing them 🙂

          But there is value, the problem is where is this risk coming from.

          You've still not identified how it is legal or even possible for a complete random to compel me to pay them to search them.

          scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DustinB3403D
            DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @Breffni-Potter said:

            You've still not identified how it is legal or even possible for a complete random to compel me to pay them to search them.

            You might be compelled by a court to have an independent audit of your email records as a means to protecting your self from further prosecution or suit.

            Keeping more email (or any at all) puts you into a place where you are then required to be able to provide those records upon demand.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
              last edited by

              @Breffni-Potter said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Yup, that's why you don't keep a warehouse of DVDs if that's the risk and you have no value to storing them 🙂

              But there is value, the problem is where is this risk coming from.

              You've still not identified how it is legal or even possible for a complete random to compel me to pay them to search them.

              What do you want identified? This is just how US law works.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @Deleted74295
                last edited by

                @Breffni-Potter said:

                You've still not identified how it is legal or even possible for a complete random to compel me to pay them to search them.

                They might not be able to compel you to pay them. but as Dustin said, you might be required to bring in an outsider to do an audit, so then YOU are paying them (the outside auditor) to do said audit. But if you have nothing to audit, there is nothing to pay. Or in this case, if you limited yourself to two years of back email, they would only be spending time going through the last two years, not the last 20+

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • 1
                • 2
                • 3
                • 4
                • 4 / 4
                • First post
                  Last post