Burned by Eschewing Best Practices
-
@scottalanmiller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@tonyshowoff said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@scottalanmiller Primarily because IE6 existed in limbo for so long, and Microsoft began changing their versioning of NT, at least in style. I think the initial idea was it was supposed to follow along those lines of each major release of NT, IE, IIS, etc was the same since they were supposed to be so "integrated,", but perhaps things fell apart as priorities changed. Office's version system is insane too though, but that's been true for much longer.
Anyway IE6 came with 2000 with SP2 and beyond. One would hope that if you've got 2000, you've got IE6+ because that means you've got at least all service packs installed. And if XP, IE7+
I remember having to setup NT 4 servers, by the end it was about 8 or so, but they were numbered in such a way like 6A and 6B to make them seem like less. It was funny because with the initially install, even in 1999 you couldn't go to Windows Update directly because the IE installed did not support file names ending in anything other than .htm(l). What a nightmare.
Before that, 1997 or 1998 you had to do NT4 update to SP3, do the major extra release, then upgrade again to 6a. Such a huge pain.
There was a version of AOL Instant Messenger released for NT 4 specifically, I don't recall why exactly, but I know it had to do with compatibility and security differences with the AIM client at the time, though later versions ran on both. Anyway, it was really messed up and clunky as hell, and in certain situations would even crash NT on start up. This was especially true if MSN was installed, accident? I think so.
At some point too there was a Windows update or later service pack that would cause an error which would simply wait for confirmation. I remember the fix being for this was to remove AIM from startup.
-
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1640323-which-raid-to-go-with-and-how-to-cut-it-up
Starts with "have to pick the RAID based on what was purchased" but tries to rationalize having bought equipment at random by saying that they picked it out "close enough" even though they can't use it as intended. Brand new VRTX (obviously they REALLY don't know how to shop for stuff) and they already can't run the RAID that they want on initial setup and they don't want to admit that someone bought it without checking why they were buying it or what specs were needed.
Seriously, how does someone buy a VRTX without checking to see what specs are needed!?!?
-
@scottalanmiller so business as usual then?
-
That guy though lol.
-
@scottalanmiller 17 years in IT......
-
Just now figuring out how to order stuff.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
Just now figuring out how to order stuff.
Clearly has some work ahead on that score lol
We've all done dumbass stuff though (I can account for some doozies) but come on, this is basic stuff....
-
Me: I just ordered that vehicle that you wanted.
Boss: How did you know which one to order, we didn't discuss what it was used for.
Me: I just got a standard snowmobile, even if it is wrong, it's kinda close, right? -
@scottalanmiller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
Me: I just ordered that vehicle that you wanted.
Boss: How did you know which one to order, we didn't discuss what it was used for.
Me: I just got a standard snowmobile, even if it is wrong, it's kinda close, right?I'm ripping into the guy right now on SW. That's unforgivable to blunder into a purchase like that.
-
@DustinB3403 Did he actually buy it already or not? I'm totally unclear from what was posted...
If he bought it before knowing what he needed to buy.... well... I can't even lol
-
@MattSpeller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@DustinB3403 Did he actually buy it already or not? I'm totally unclear from what was posted...
If he bought it before knowing what he needed to buy.... well... I can't even lol
From what he said in a previous post it appears that the item is being shipped out. Of course now i have to find it.
^ this to me seems like it's already been purchased, but it could be that he's trying to design the system.
-
Are these new? What the heck purpose do they fill? Super weird man.... I think you called it spot on: "spec'd by sales dude for max commission"
-
@MattSpeller In private conversations with the guy now. He is in fact in ownership of this unit, and is trying to set it up to fit his business needs.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@MattSpeller In private conversations with the guy now. He is in fact in ownership of this unit, and is trying to set it up to fit his business needs.
-
@MattSpeller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@DustinB3403 said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@MattSpeller In private conversations with the guy now. He is in fact in ownership of this unit, and is trying to set it up to fit his business needs.
Pretty much...
-
Removed a drive from a RAID1 mirror to replace a failed drive.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@scottalanmiller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
Me: I just ordered that vehicle that you wanted.
Boss: How did you know which one to order, we didn't discuss what it was used for.
Me: I just got a standard snowmobile, even if it is wrong, it's kinda close, right?I'm ripping into the guy right now on SW. That's unforgivable to blunder into a purchase like that.
How do you manage to rip into people on SW without getting put in David's little moderation time out corner???
-
@RojoLoco said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@DustinB3403 said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
@scottalanmiller said in Burned by Eschewing Best Practices:
Me: I just ordered that vehicle that you wanted.
Boss: How did you know which one to order, we didn't discuss what it was used for.
Me: I just got a standard snowmobile, even if it is wrong, it's kinda close, right?I'm ripping into the guy right now on SW. That's unforgivable to blunder into a purchase like that.
How do you manage to rip into people on SW without getting put in David's little moderation time out corner???
I'm not ripping into him, asking important questions to help resolve the issue.
Also Dave has tried several times and conceded that "You (I) were right, no longer moderated."
-
Also Dave has tried several times and conceded that "You (I) were right, no longer moderated."
Words that he wouldn't say to me, even if his very life were at stake.
-
But this does sound like a case of FakeRAID, to which this person was brought in to try and repair.
