need help setting up a Yealink with FreePBX without End Point Manager
-
@JaredBusch said:
@Dashrender Ports open?
Where do I need open ports? The FreePBX box currently had iptables and selinux disabled. Do I need to open ports on my end to make this work?
-
That means that all of your ports are open.
-
@Dashrender said:
Where do I need open ports? The FreePBX box currently had iptables and selinux disabled. Do I need to open ports on my end to make this work?
Yeah, that should mean you are wide open.
-
@mlnews said:
That means that all of your ports are open.
LOL - yes I know all my ports are showing from the FreePBX system right now... I'm simply wanting to get it working before I lock it down...
and I'll be happy to scrap this whole thing again and follow my own instructions from the other thread.
-
when trying to dial another phone on the same switch, do I need to do anything more than just dial their extension?
-
Alright - it appears that my Sonicwall is doing some sort of blocking locally.
When I put my PC to a different network with the Zoiper softphone, now I see.
And a successful call from the inside to the softphone...
-
@Dashrender said:
Alright - it appears that my Sonicwall is doing some sort of blocking locally.
When I put my PC to a different network with the Zoiper softphone, now I see.
I think you need to unblock 5060 and 5061 UDP locally. You may also need to unblock some RTP ports I don't remember what those ones are though.
-
@Dashrender said:
Alright - it appears that my Sonicwall is doing some sort of blocking locally.
When I put my PC to a different network with the Zoiper softphone, now I see.
And a successful call from the inside to the softphone...
Oh SonicWall, the bane of VoIP. I would never run those for anything. Total garbage. They mess with your traffic and break things. Completely worthless. Worst firewall I know to find while doing VoIP work.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Oh SonicWall, the bane of VoIP. I would never run those for anything. Total garbage. They mess with your traffic and break things. Completely worthless. Worst firewall I know to find while doing VoIP work.
What would you replace them with?
-
OK then
A simple change to the Sonicwall fixed that problem, just enable consistent NAT under VOIP.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Oh SonicWall, the bane of VoIP. I would never run those for anything. Total garbage. They mess with your traffic and break things. Completely worthless. Worst firewall I know to find while doing VoIP work.
What would you replace them with?
Netgear ProSafe is better! Although I wouldn't use those anymore. Ubiquiti owns the low end space. Such high quality, such low price.
Pretty much if you need UTM Sophos for most people and Palo Alto on the high end. If you don't need a full UTM, Ubiquiti. At some scale you need to look at Juniper, Brocade or Cisco type gear, but that scale is HUGE.
-
We are consolidating from 5 locations (65, 4, 4, 4, 3) to three locations (70, 7, 3)
Time to start looking at Edgerouters.
Do they support dual WAN links with failover?
-
@Dashrender said:
We are consolidating from 5 locations (65, 4, 4, 4, 3) to three locations (70, 7, 3)
Time to start looking at Edgerouters.
Do they support dual WAN links with failover?
They sure do!
-
@g.jacobse said:
Here is a screen shot from my phone:
Label and display name: username
Register name / user name: valid extension
Password: passwordServer Host: IP or some.domain.com
I wonder if you have my old phone. LOL
