ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Converting MKVs to MP4: Would This Decrease File Size?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    32 Posts 8 Posters 5.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thanksajdotcomT
      thanksajdotcom @Nic
      last edited by

      @Nic said:

      MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

      This is true...quite true.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @tonyshowoff
        last edited by

        @tonyshowoff said:

        I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

        More like brutally destroying the quality.

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • thanksajdotcomT
          thanksajdotcom @A Former User
          last edited by

          @thecreativeone91 said:

          @Nic said:

          MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

          So now we know where AJ got these torrent-ed files..

          Not denying nor admitting to anything...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Bigger drive is definitely the better answer. Not free, but drive space is pretty cheap and a permanent solution. Doing handbreak work requires a tremendous amount of disk and CPU resources. I've done this a lot for my own movie collection compression and the amount of time and effort that it takes is absolutely crazy.

            thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • thanksajdotcomT
              thanksajdotcom @tonyshowoff
              last edited by

              @tonyshowoff said:

              I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

              You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @tonyshowoff said:

                I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                More like brutally destroying the quality.

                Especially considering the source. They likely have been transcoded a few times already.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • ?
                  A Former User @thanksajdotcom
                  last edited by

                  @thanksajdotcom said:

                  @tonyshowoff said:

                  I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                  You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

                  Then you didn't read the content of them.

                  thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • thanksajdotcomT
                    thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    Bigger drive is definitely the better answer. Not free, but drive space is pretty cheap and a permanent solution. Doing handbreak work requires a tremendous amount of disk and CPU resources. I've done this a lot for my own movie collection compression and the amount of time and effort that it takes is absolutely crazy.

                    I have a non-NAS external drive I ordered a power cord for. The original got lost somehow. I'm going to network it via the USB port on the other NAS, as I have a WD MyPassport (500GB) being used by the main NAS. I think the Seagate GoFlex that I'm doing this with is 2TB, but it may be 3. It'll be a good landing platform for the compressed/multi-archive downloads I get that I then extract onto the final destination.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @thecreativeone91 said:

                      @thanksajdotcom said:

                      @tonyshowoff said:

                      I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                      You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

                      Then you didn't read the content of them.

                      I did. But he's Tony over here and Antal? over there...I think.

                      tonyshowoffT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • tonyshowoffT
                        tonyshowoff @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @thanksajdotcom said:

                        @thecreativeone91 said:

                        @thanksajdotcom said:

                        @tonyshowoff said:

                        I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                        You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

                        Then you didn't read the content of them.

                        I did. But he's Tony over here and Antal? over there...I think.

                        Yeah, I got all alias here, so the cops can't stay on my trail.

                        thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • thanksajdotcomT
                          thanksajdotcom @tonyshowoff
                          last edited by

                          @tonyshowoff said:

                          @thanksajdotcom said:

                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                          @thanksajdotcom said:

                          @tonyshowoff said:

                          I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                          You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

                          Then you didn't read the content of them.

                          I did. But he's Tony over here and Antal? over there...I think.

                          Yeah, I got all alias here, so the cops can't stay on my trail.

                          ROFL

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 1 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post