ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Microsoft Self-Audit Letter

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    66 Posts 11 Posters 16.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Minion QueenM
      Minion Queen
      last edited by Minion Queen

      We had one REALLY out of compliance. They just had to get their licenses in order and prove that they had them ordered in their letter. Not a huge deal at all (however this client had to spend like $30K quickly).

      The other had to buy a couple licenses and get caught up. Not bad at all.

      garak0410G NetworkNerdN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • garak0410G
        garak0410 @Minion Queen
        last edited by

        @Minion-Queen said:

        We have one out of compliance. They just had to get their licenses in order and prove that they had them ordered in their letter. Not a huge deal at all (however this client had to spend like $30K quickly).

        I'm still awaiting a MLS before I order SQL licenses...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • NetworkNerdN
          NetworkNerd @Minion Queen
          last edited by

          @Minion-Queen said:

          We had one REALLY out of compliance. They just had to get their licenses in order and prove that they had them ordered in their letter. Not a huge deal at all (however this client had to spend like $30K quickly).

          The other had to buy a couple licenses and get caught up. Not bad at all.

          Wow - and you only have about 30 days to place those orders. I'm sure management was thrilled with that expenditure.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Minion QueenM
            Minion Queen
            last edited by

            Yeah the IT Admin there must have heard about that one. We were brought in for this project and I am glad we could help them. But I am sure the discussion with his boss wasn't a pleasant one.

            NetworkNerdN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • NetworkNerdN
              NetworkNerd @Minion Queen
              last edited by NetworkNerd

              @Minion-Queen said:

              Yeah the IT Admin there must have heard about that one. We were brought in for this project and I am glad we could help them. But I am sure the discussion with his boss wasn't a pleasant one.

              I don't see that as being a pleasant experience either.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                Carnival Boy
                last edited by

                In some places I've worked it's been the owner that is a bit too casual with licences. I've often come in and had to persuade them that being "mostly licenced" isn't really acceptable.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
                  last edited by

                  @Carnival-Boy said:

                  In some places I've worked it's been the owner that is a bit too casual with licences. I've often come in and had to persuade them that being "mostly licenced" isn't really acceptable.

                  That's a natural problem with owners. An owner gets the "it's my money" feeling about licenses and sees them as him spending his own income on things he can't tangibly hold. Managers don't normally have this problem because they don't have the same sense of loss - the money that they spend is the business' money and the licenses are just a cost of doing business. No reason for an honest manager to have any qualms with paying for what is used. But owners get emotional.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • garak0410G
                    garak0410
                    last edited by

                    I got an MLS...no SQL license to be found and no way to prove it...all we have is a SQL 2008 R2 for Workgroups with 5 user CALS. If I got a core license and downgraded to 2008 R2, can that still apply for the WORKGROUP version of SQL or do I need to purchase a new copy of SQL?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • NetworkNerdN
                      NetworkNerd @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said:

                      I had this at one client back in March.

                      We had already performed our own internal audit and new that we needed some office licensing (10 licenses off 2013 Standard). We were going to purchase them over 3 months to spread out the impact on the numbers to cross two fiscal quarters. That ended up not happening.

                      I found nothing else wrong during the audit other than some misapplied keys. Was quite pleased to not have any surprises.

                      In the case of misapplied keys, it's certainly something that needs to be resolved, but you're still compliant in terms of having the licenses you need to license all MS products for the company as long as you purchased everything needed to cover your bases, right? What I mean to say is...if you had not applied the right keys before confirming compliance and then MS found out you had misapplied keys, would that be a fine?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • garak0410G
                        garak0410
                        last edited by garak0410

                        Thanks for all of the advice...we found that we needed some licenses and we purchased them and are about to send in the letter.

                        Thanks...
                        Brian

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        • 4
                        • 2 / 4
                        • First post
                          Last post