I think I need to look into setting up a SBC or STUN server for a client
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
It would be awesome to see Pertino move into this space as well! soft or hard phones with Pertino could make life grand!
We have soft phones with Pertino. They've handled that from day one!
No, they need to get a phone manufacturer on board and embed it.
-
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
It would be awesome to see Pertino move into this space as well! soft or hard phones with Pertino could make life grand!
We have soft phones with Pertino. They've handled that from day one!
No, they need to get a phone manufacturer on board and embed it.
I agree, Snom and Yealink. But for softphones, the job is already done.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I agree, Snom and Yealink. But for softphones, the job is already done.
And it is already valid for my PBX since I use PBX in a Flash and that is on 6. This makes me debate my choice to use Elastix at this client though. As they have Pertino in place for a few things already (10 device account) I could leverage that for soft phones on the sales guys laptops since they are the ones with Pertino now. I would just need to use PBX in a Flash instead of Elastix. Hmmm
-
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller said:
I agree, Snom and Yealink. But for softphones, the job is already done.
And it is already valid for my PBX since I use PBX in a Flash and that is on 6. This makes me debate my choice to use Elastix at this client though. As they have Pertino in place for a few things already (10 device account) I could leverage that for soft phones on the sales guys laptops since they are the ones with Pertino now. I would just need to use PBX in a Flash instead of Elastix. Hmmm
Elastix 3 will address that but it is Beta only now.
-
As this is a client that I am fairly active at, I do not care too much if it is not Elastix, but that is what I was planning to set up. The slowness of Elastix updating bothers me, but the integration of features makes it hard to resist.
-
@JaredBusch said:
As this is a client that I am fairly active at, I do not care too much if it is not Elastix, but that is what I was planning to set up. The slowness of Elastix updating bothers me, but the integration of features makes it hard to resist.
Elastix updates are really good for the past two years. People often think that they are behind when they are actually, often, ahead of the curve.
-
Adding Pertino to the mix is another reason to go with PBXin a Flash as well as the fact that I do not need any of the extra integration! just that they would be nice.
-
How are you using the softphones on Pertino if it can't connect to the CentOS 5 box?
Or are you saying simply that the softphones already have Pertino integrated into it's software (or that since Pertino is on the computer you're using, the softphone will just use it)?
-
@Dashrender said:
How are you using the softphones on Pertino if it can't connect to the CentOS 5 box?
The soft phones are on Pertino but we don't use them that way yet. Since the PBX is not.
-
All software on a Pertino PC is on the Pertino VPN. So any soft phone will work with Pertino.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
All software on a Pertino PC is on the Pertino VPN. So any soft phone will work with Pertino.
OK. so the softphone had no clue about Pertino specifically - it just gets the benefits from being on a PC with Pertino installed... gotcha!
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
All software on a Pertino PC is on the Pertino VPN. So any soft phone will work with Pertino.
OK. so the softphone had no clue about Pertino specifically - it just gets the benefits from being on a PC with Pertino installed... gotcha!
Exactly Pertino is just a transparent IP network layer.
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
All software on a Pertino PC is on the Pertino VPN. So any soft phone will work with Pertino.
OK. so the softphone had no clue about Pertino specifically - it just gets the benefits from being on a PC with Pertino installed... gotcha!
