Resentment to Purchasing Software - Split From Unrelated Topic on IT Professionals
-
The real issue here comes in when someone is hired to "do", but decides to "buy". What often happens is a cover up, an attempt to keep looking like they are performing the IT tasks, while actually someone else is paid to do them. This results in some pretty serious messes, like demanding that binaries not be executable. Clearly making demands at a technical level that they weren't ready to discuss.
-
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
And to get collaboration it's not just Install the software like it is with Office. You need to now manage a server running NextCloud and issues that come up with that as well.
Is that different than running your own Sharepoint? Running NC is a lot simpler than running SP.
No that's the same. My point there was with office there's an option to not have to do that. You don't have that option with LibreOffice. Sure you have the option to run locally if that's a real requirement but most of the time it's not.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
And to get collaboration it's not just Install the software like it is with Office. You need to now manage a server running NextCloud and issues that come up with that as well.
Is that different than running your own Sharepoint? Running NC is a lot simpler than running SP.
No that's the same. My point there was with office there's an option to not have to do that. You don't have that option with LibreOffice. Sure you have the option to run locally if that's a real requirement but most of the time it's not.
What's the option? Can you do MS Office collaboration without Sharepoint?
Or do you just mean hosted? NC offers that.
-
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
And to get collaboration it's not just Install the software like it is with Office. You need to now manage a server running NextCloud and issues that come up with that as well.
Is that different than running your own Sharepoint? Running NC is a lot simpler than running SP.
No that's the same. My point there was with office there's an option to not have to do that. You don't have that option with LibreOffice. Sure you have the option to run locally if that's a real requirement but most of the time it's not.
What's the option? Can you do MS Office collaboration without Sharepoint?
Or do you just mean hosted? NC offers that.
I'm saying office will do collaboration without a local SharePoint install through O365 (because most places it's not a requirement to have everything local). LibreOffice requires you to run something else entirely to be able to do collaboration no matter whether that's a real requirement from the customer or not.
-
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@IRJ said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
So you have to go to your NTG or whatever IT labor you use and open your pockets at $150-300 an hour when you have an issue.
The same as with non-FOSS software. People go to pay for support with non-FOSS solutions way, way more than FOSS ones. This is one of those myths that people selling software repeat, but has absolutely zero foundation in the real world. While it's 100% off topic and unrelated to the discussion at hand, it's a myth that should never be repeated.
The obvious examples would be things like Windows or MS Office vs. Ubuntu or LibreOffice. The amount of support hours that you have to pay to an IT firm (or hours spent by your department) are vastly higher, on average, with Windows or Office than nearly any alternative. It's some insanity that has permeated IT through sales and marketing that has convinced people that by some logic if you pay for software, therefore it costs less to maintain. There's no logical connection between the two, in fact, logic says the opposite - companies making software that you have to pay for have to have more overhead to acquisition to accommodate the process (licensing Windows is so complex, even full time Windows people constantly need to seek consultants just on the purchasing process alone) and then you have vendors who know their customers are willing to pay and so create ecosystems around milking them for more and more funds. And that's exactly what we see. Windows, in the enterprise, is measured at numbers like "quadruple" the support cost of an Ubuntu install doing the same workload. And Office must be in the thousands of times more effort per install.
It's simply absurd to connect FOSS with "more cost to support". Sure, nothing about FOSS guarantees that it also requires less IT effort, but the nature of FOSS actually does encourage that and the ecosystems of paid software encourage more costly support. And the market, quite obviously, plays this out constantly.
Ok the office discussion has sidetracked this.
Back to this post. I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
Vetastic - $195 a month for a hosted service. When OpenVPMS is open source and free.
SodiumSuite - No idea pricing. Why even bother when other open source tools exist such as TacticalRMM. Sure it's new but it existing has now devaluated SodiumSuite by quite a lot. If you want Linux support you could just contribute that to the project instead of building your own separate competitor.
The point is, you either believe FOSS is always the better option or you believe that there are times where paid software is better.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
The point is, you either believe FOSS is always the better option or you believe that there are times where paid software is better.
I 100% have always stated the same thing. Go ahead search, it's absolutely always the same...
- Open Source licensing is always superior for the customer.
- Closed source software is often better because the qualify of license is a small factor in the software decision.
-
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
You own Vestastic and SodiumSuite?
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
Vetastic - $195 a month for a hosted service. When OpenVPMS is open source and free.
This is a weird comparison because...
- One is a service, not software.
- This thread isn't about software.
So it's neither applicable to the topic, nor a comparison on its own.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
You own Vestastic and SodiumSuite?
I do. Neither is software nor for sale.
-
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
You own Vestastic and SodiumSuite?
I do. Neither is software nor for sale.
Man you are splitting hairs now. You just spent how many posts comparing office365 which is a service to LibreOffice which is software.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
You own Vestastic and SodiumSuite?
Services are quite different than software. When you buy services, it is human skills and support and resources that you get. Software is code. Software is commonly a part of a service offering, but products like software and hardware are very different than services that may or may not use software and hardware behind the scenes.
But when you buy a service, you don't "own something" at the end. You "get something done".
If you buy software, there's no guarantee that it's been run. It can just sit in a box and never "exist" in a running state. When you buy a service, there is no guarantee that there is software, only an availability of a result.
Like the difference between hiring a maid, or buying a broom. Related, but very different.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
You own Vestastic and SodiumSuite?
I do. Neither is software nor for sale.
Man you are splitting hairs now. You just spent how many posts comparing office365 which is a service to LibreOffice which is software.
Office 365 is a licensing model for buying software that you download, install, and run yourself. You get software. It's a common misconception that Office 365 is a service, but it's primarily a licensing option for software. Within the O365 licensing pool there are services, but Office isn't one of them. That's still delivered as software that you install and run. Unless you mean just the hosted version, which is a slightly different product, in which case LO offers that too, but I discussed neither of those. Only the software.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
Man you are splitting hairs now.
Anything but. I feel like you are missing, no matter how many times I point it out, that the entire point of the thread cannot be related to products, as it is 100% a topic about IT as a profession, not products that people in the IT profession may or may not buy.
It's not "why do people buy IT products", it's "when do we consider something buying rather than doing when it's IT".
There are two insanely large misses being made constantly...
First, that it's about products when even the title says IT.
Second, that one is bad and the other good. When the discussion is about how do we identify one from the other as both are obviously necessary.
-
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@scottalanmiller said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
I don't believe that you actually think this way. If you did all of the products you are selling would be open source or you would just be using the existing open source things.
- I sell no products.
- I'm confused by this talk of products at all as none of it is related to the topic. It's not the office discussion that has sidetracked things, it's the entire talk of any products at all. The post was about IT, not software or hardware.
You own Vestastic and SodiumSuite?
I do. Neither is software nor for sale.
Man you are splitting hairs now. You just spent how many posts comparing office365 which is a service to LibreOffice which is software.
Office 365 is a licensing model for buying software that you download, install, and run yourself. You get software. It's a common misconception that Office 365 is a service, but it's primarily a licensing option for software. Within the O365 licensing pool there are services, but Office isn't one of them. That's still delivered as software that you install and run. Unless you mean just the hosted version, which is a slightly different product, in which case LO offers that too, but I discussed neither of those. Only the software.
False. You don't need to download anything. It's 100% a service that also let's you have local copies of the products.
-
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
False. You don't need to download anything. It's 100% a service that also let's you have local copies of the products.
Talk about splitting hairs. The real MS Office product requires a download. And it requires that you install it to use it. There's no service offering with the real MS Office product.
And all of this I already pointed out in earlier posts, that both MSO and LO have hosted, online "service" offerings of lesser versions that I wasn't including because they are different.
-
Forked so that you guys can have your discussion our of nowhere about a perceived resentment to closed source solutions based, I presume, on the fact that some of us don't like one or two pieces of software that happens to be closed rather than on anything stated. The original topic was about IT professionals vs. people who hire IT professionals and don't do any IT themselves, but somehow this thread on software got added to it. So it's forked so now you can talk about this perceived resentment.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Resentment to Purchasing Software - Split From Unrelated Topic on IT Professionals:
@stacksofplates said in When Does It Stop Even Being IT: Buyers vs Doers:
Vetastic - $195 a month for a hosted service. When OpenVPMS is open source and free.
This is a weird comparison because...
- One is a service, not software.
- This thread isn't about software.
So it's neither applicable to the topic, nor a comparison on its own.
You can purchase a local appliance of the vet service to run at your business location. Physical appliances are products not services. And I still do not believe that there is a difference between offering a service and using an open source product.
I can either run Rocketchat locally as a product or use their service. You're making distinctions here to justify your actions on selling things with one hand for high prices and then the other saying free are better.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Resentment to Purchasing Software - Split From Unrelated Topic on IT Professionals:
Forked so that you guys can have your discussion our of nowhere about a perceived resentment to closed source solutions based, I presume, on the fact that some of us don't like one or two pieces of software that happens to be closed rather than on anything stated. The original topic was about IT professionals vs. people who hire IT professionals and don't do any IT themselves, but somehow this thread on software got added to it. So it's forked so now you can talk about this perceived resentment.
The original post was about IT buying vs doing. Purchasing software to ease IT burden is 100% related to that. Not sure why you keep saying this.
-
@IRJ said in Resentment to Purchasing Software - Split From Unrelated Topic on IT Professionals:
I'm not sure I understand the resentment on mangolassi of purchasing software.
I think it's hard to understand primarily because it doesn't exist. I'm not aware of anyone here, regardless of what claims people make about each other, that feels this way nor have I ever met someone around here who does (Stallman doesn't hang out here.)
I'm not sure if it's the lack of fanboi reaction to closed source that creates a perception of hating it? Or that some of us find FOSS to be far more viable than closed source fans would want to promote.. I have no idea.
But I can tell you, for certain, that the "all open source is evil" mantra remains and is repeated a lot and if anyone dares to suggest that FOSS licensing is advantages (licensing, not products) the diatribes about "all closed source software" and other "what does that have to do with what is said" responses are crazy, and totally assured.
You perceive that this community is anti-closed source software. I think what you're actually seeing is simply a community that considers both based on their merits and compared to the industry at large, that comes across as anti-CS because so many CS products are obviously (and Ballman has made this clear) relying on politicizing and FUD to seem viable.
And many people confuse Microsoft with closed source. It's often seen if someone isn't a MIcrosoft fan, that therefore it is the license that people don't like when, in reality, I think we all know it's primarily the product.
