Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS
-
It's still a nascent tech.
-
Why not set this up to make all of your dns queries
-
@Obsolesce how does that help when I do 99% of my lookups from a desktop?
-
@Obsolesce if I did that, it would bypass my PiHole and put all kinds of crap back into my pages on my phone slowing it down. That would suck.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@Obsolesce if I did that, it would bypass my PiHole and put all kinds of crap back into my pages on my phone slowing it down. That would suck.
It is at least a simple DNS privacy option when you are not at home. But I found it mostly useless.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@scottalanmiller Yeah the services depend on doubleclick etc, so if you have those blocked, then you're SOL for using those streaming services. I was kind of pissed about it. .
Yup, CBS does this as well.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@Obsolesce if I did that, it would bypass my PiHole and put all kinds of crap back into my pages on my phone slowing it down. That would suck.
All of our edge devices are set to block DNS queries from anywhere but the local DNS server. So, no avoiding it.
-
Ugh: https://support.umbrella.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001371526-Web-Browsers-and-DNS-over-HTTPS-default
Cisco/Umbrella/OpenDNS instructions to block DoH.
-
@PhlipElder said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
Cisco/Umbrella/OpenDNS instructions to block DoH.
Well it involves security and Cisco doesn't like security.
-
So I am thinking this makes search engine data much more valuable when your ISP isnt able to sell your information as easily.
-
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
-
@JasGot said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
Definitely a good thing overall, but as expected something is always in it for Google
-
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@JasGot said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
Definitely a good thing overall, but as expected something is always in it for Google
It's called money, yes Google is a for profit company. Get over it.
-
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
So I am thinking this makes search engine data much more valuable when your ISP isnt able to sell your information as easily.
Sensible.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@JasGot said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
Definitely a good thing overall, but as expected something is always in it for Google
It's called money, yes Google is a for profit company. Get over it.
The people that use duckduckgo are the true winners here
-
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@DustinB3403 said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@JasGot said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
Definitely a good thing overall, but as expected something is always in it for Google
It's called money, yes Google is a for profit company. Get over it.
The people that use duckduckgo are the true winners here
I still use Google but my default search engine is still duckduckgo. Big fan of their shortcuts.
-
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@DustinB3403 said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@JasGot said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
Definitely a good thing overall, but as expected something is always in it for Google
It's called money, yes Google is a for profit company. Get over it.
The people that use duckduckgo are the true winners here
People like me.
-
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@DustinB3403 said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@JasGot said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
@IRJ said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
this makes search engine data much more valuable
Follow the money, right? Good catch!
Definitely a good thing overall, but as expected something is always in it for Google
It's called money, yes Google is a for profit company. Get over it.
The people that use duckduckgo are the true winners here
I tried to use duckduckgo for about 2 months. I still prefer the google results.
-
I use Bing 95% of the time
-
@Obsolesce said in Why big ISPs aren’t happy about Google’s plans for encrypted DNS:
I use Bing 95% of the time
bahah loser.
