Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?
-
Hi folks,
Im looking at an array of 24 x 14TB drives in Raid 10, any reason to avoid that? It meets my capacity needs, but not sure where the limit of Raid 6 and the line to use Raid 10 sits?
Best,
Jim -
To ask, what is the use case of this system? That's 168TB usable once formatted. Assuming 7200 RPM disks (performance) won't be horrible, nor great.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
To ask, what is the use case of this system? That's 168TB usable once formatted. Assuming 7200 RPM disks (performance) won't be horrible, nor great.
On site backups. No live use data.
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
Hi folks,
Im looking at an array of 24 x 14TB drives in Raid 10, any reason to avoid that? It meets my capacity needs, but not sure where the limit of Raid 6 and the line to use Raid 10 sits?
Best,
JimI'd want to stick with RAID10. Recovery time at that scale with anything else is ludicrous.
-
@travisdh1 Any other options other than 10?
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
Hi folks,
Im looking at an array of 24 x 14TB drives in Raid 10, any reason to avoid that? It meets my capacity needs, but not sure where the limit of Raid 6 and the line to use Raid 10 sits?
Best,
JimNo RAID 6 system will be safe with drives of that size. Resilver time alone would make it a non-starter. RAID 10 is the ony viable choice there, even with 15K SAS drives.
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@travisdh1 Any other options other than 10?
RAIN. That's it. You are well beyond any RAID options outside of 10.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
Hi folks,
Im looking at an array of 24 x 14TB drives in Raid 10, any reason to avoid that? It meets my capacity needs, but not sure where the limit of Raid 6 and the line to use Raid 10 sits?
Best,
JimNo RAID 6 system will be safe with drives of that size. Resilver time alone would make it a non-starter. RAID 10 is the ony viable choice there, even with 15K SAS drives.
These are 1^15 drives, would that be fine raid 10?
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
These are 1^15 drives, would that be fine raid 10?
URE rates are not applicable in RAID 0 or RAID 1, and therefore not in anything based on them. URE is a risk for parity RAID.
-
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
It's 7.2k disks, only for backups.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
These are 1^15 drives, would that be fine raid 10?
URE rates are not applicable in RAID 0 or RAID 1, and therefore not in anything based on them. URE is a risk for parity RAID.
Ok, makes sense. Would I want to configure as one large 24 drive array, or say, 2 x 12 disk arrays in the one box?
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
It's 7.2k disks, only for backups.
The disks are really slow compared to an SSD, so if you lost 1 disk your repair time for any parity array would take weeks if not longer.
Even with RAID10 it's going to be painfully slow.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
It's 7.2k disks, only for backups.
The disks are really slow compared to an SSD, so if you lost 1 disk your repair time for any parity array would take weeks if not longer.
Even with RAID10 it's going to be painfully slow.
Thats fine, as its backup area. Raid 10 looks to be the choice here. If a disk fails, the new disk will rebuild from its mirror/partner, so no calcs needed right?
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
These are 1^15 drives, would that be fine raid 10?
URE rates are not applicable in RAID 0 or RAID 1, and therefore not in anything based on them. URE is a risk for parity RAID.
Ok, makes sense. Would I want to configure as one large 24 drive array, or say, 2 x 12 disk arrays in the one box?
The same rule applies here, One Big Raid.
Splitting here doesn't make sense, and at scale you'd use RAIN. Since this is all one box, use one big raid.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
These are 1^15 drives, would that be fine raid 10?
URE rates are not applicable in RAID 0 or RAID 1, and therefore not in anything based on them. URE is a risk for parity RAID.
Ok, makes sense. Would I want to configure as one large 24 drive array, or say, 2 x 12 disk arrays in the one box?
The same rule applies here, One Big Raid.
Splitting here doesn't make sense, and at scale you'd use RAIN. Since this is all one box, use one big raid.
Ok cool, thanks.
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
It's 7.2k disks, only for backups.
In something like RAID 6, imagine the time it would take to resilver even a single drive. That make drives, that slow, at that size... it could take 2-3 months easily to replace a single failed drive!
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
These are 1^15 drives, would that be fine raid 10?
URE rates are not applicable in RAID 0 or RAID 1, and therefore not in anything based on them. URE is a risk for parity RAID.
Ok, makes sense. Would I want to configure as one large 24 drive array, or say, 2 x 12 disk arrays in the one box?
Size of the array doesn't matter very much since it is essentially all the same. Two smaller RAID 10s would just be more to manage. Your recovery domain is 14TB either way.
-
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
It's 7.2k disks, only for backups.
The disks are really slow compared to an SSD, so if you lost 1 disk your repair time for any parity array would take weeks if not longer.
Even with RAID10 it's going to be painfully slow.
Thats fine, as its backup area. Raid 10 looks to be the choice here. If a disk fails, the new disk will rebuild from its mirror/partner, so no calcs needed right?
Correct, mirrored RAID recovery is a copy operation.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
@Jimmy9008 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid limits?:
@DustinB3403 said in Raid10, must use or another Raid/limits?:
The issue is due to the capacity you're looking at, unless you were going with those 18TB SSD Samsung drives, which at that capacity you'd consider RAID6.
It's 7.2k disks, only for backups.
In something like RAID 6, imagine the time it would take to resilver even a single drive. That make drives, that slow, at that size... it could take 2-3 months easily to replace a single failed drive!
Yeah, that is why I am checking before going ahead with anything
thanks Scott.Any particular vendor/hardware you would suggest? The 24 x array with 14TB drives is just in theory in my head at the moment, so - what tech would you suggest. Business is against using cloud here for this.
