ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole

    IT Discussion
    pi-hole balena etcher balena cloud balena-pihole
    4
    12
    932
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NetworkNerdN
      NetworkNerd
      last edited by

      Unless I read that blog completely wrong, provisioning in conjunction with balenaCloud allows you to update multiple Pi-Holes from a central location and gives you the ability to access the admin interface of each Pi-Hole from balenaCloud. I could see that as pretty useful if I was deploying a Pi-Home for a bunch of different family members or even for several remote offices.

      scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @NetworkNerd
        last edited by

        @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

        Unless I read that blog completely wrong, provisioning in conjunction with balenaCloud allows you to update multiple Pi-Holes from a central location and gives you the ability to access the admin interface of each Pi-Hole from balenaCloud.

        You can already do that SO easily in so many simpler ways. This looks like a lot more work and things to fail. Pi-Hole is essentially zero effort, Docker brings a lot of risk.

        Access to the admin interface of each is kinda handy if you have two. But that's just silly, too much work for no benefit. At any scale you'd not want to use the web interface to manage them anyway, that's fundamentally not scalable. You'd use Salt or Chef or Ansible and do so much more for less.

        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @NetworkNerd
          last edited by

          @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

          I could see that as pretty useful if I was deploying a Pi-Home for a bunch of different family members or even for several remote offices.

          I do that already, and just deploy a single Pi-Hole. If you want lots of Pi-Holes for some reason, I think there are already seemingly way better ways to do that. But mostly, I'd wonder why'd you'd want more than one or two. But certainly there could be reasons. But mostly that would be if you were running some kind of Pi-Hole support company which would be super weird and I think way better suited with something much more enterprise.

          NetworkNerdN 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • black3dynamiteB
            black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

            @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

            Unless I read that blog completely wrong, provisioning in conjunction with balenaCloud allows you to update multiple Pi-Holes from a central location and gives you the ability to access the admin interface of each Pi-Hole from balenaCloud.

            You can already do that SO easily in so many simpler ways. This looks like a lot more work and things to fail. Pi-Hole is essentially zero effort, Docker brings a lot of risk.

            Access to the admin interface of each is kinda handy if you have two. But that's just silly, too much work for no benefit. At any scale you'd not want to use the web interface to manage them anyway, that's fundamentally not scalable. You'd use Salt or Chef or Ansible and do so much more for less.

            And there are command line options to make it easier to manage pihole too.
            https://docs.pi-hole.net/core/pihole-command/

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
              last edited by

              @black3dynamite said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

              @scottalanmiller said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

              @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

              Unless I read that blog completely wrong, provisioning in conjunction with balenaCloud allows you to update multiple Pi-Holes from a central location and gives you the ability to access the admin interface of each Pi-Hole from balenaCloud.

              You can already do that SO easily in so many simpler ways. This looks like a lot more work and things to fail. Pi-Hole is essentially zero effort, Docker brings a lot of risk.

              Access to the admin interface of each is kinda handy if you have two. But that's just silly, too much work for no benefit. At any scale you'd not want to use the web interface to manage them anyway, that's fundamentally not scalable. You'd use Salt or Chef or Ansible and do so much more for less.

              And there are command line options to make it easier to manage pihole too.
              https://docs.pi-hole.net/core/pihole-command/

              Oh yeah, Pi-Hole is SO simple. Things like Salt or just scripts would seem to be impossible to beat to manage it on any scale. But it also seems like the kind of product where scale would never really be a factor. But I could kind of see where it might be sensible. But I'd totally want Salt in the case I'm picturing.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • NetworkNerdN
                NetworkNerd @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                I could see that as pretty useful if I was deploying a Pi-Home for a bunch of different family members or even for several remote offices.

                I do that already, and just deploy a single Pi-Hole. If you want lots of Pi-Holes for some reason, I think there are already seemingly way better ways to do that. But mostly, I'd wonder why'd you'd want more than one or two. But certainly there could be reasons. But mostly that would be if you were running some kind of Pi-Hole support company which would be super weird and I think way better suited with something much more enterprise.

                I'm definitely not looking to run a Pi-Hole support company.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @NetworkNerd
                  last edited by

                  @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                  I'm definitely not looking to run a Pi-Hole support company.

                  LOL, no one is. I think that the idea is neat, but that Balena is just a weird bit of overkill in this scenario. If you had a lot of other things and Pi-Hole was one of many things, then totally different.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • NetworkNerdN
                    NetworkNerd @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                    @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                    I could see that as pretty useful if I was deploying a Pi-Home for a bunch of different family members or even for several remote offices.

                    I do that already, and just deploy a single Pi-Hole. If you want lots of Pi-Holes for some reason, I think there are already seemingly way better ways to do that. But mostly, I'd wonder why'd you'd want more than one or two. But certainly there could be reasons. But mostly that would be if you were running some kind of Pi-Hole support company which would be super weird and I think way better suited with something much more enterprise.

                    I was saying I had considered setting up a Pi-hole at each of our extended family's homes. Sorry if that was not clear earlier. But I see what you mean about other options to manage them.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @NetworkNerd
                      last edited by

                      @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                      I was saying I had considered setting up a Pi-hole at each of our extended family's homes. Sorry if that was not clear earlier.

                      It was, but why? That's buying one piece of hardware per location, and managing one install per location. Why not just all share one?

                      gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • gjacobseG
                        gjacobse @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                        @NetworkNerd said in Centralized Management for Pi-Hole - balena-pihole:

                        I was saying I had considered setting up a Pi-hole at each of our extended family's homes. Sorry if that was not clear earlier.

                        It was, but why? That's buying one piece of hardware per location, and managing one install per location. Why not just all share one?

                        Agreed- if you must- host it on vultr for this.. for less than a happy meal you can have one running for a month

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post