ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Can't apt-get when running Bridged NIC on Oracle Virtualbox Ubuntu Server 14.04

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    linuxweb serverlamp
    21 Posts 4 Posters 6.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      This is a really weird issue that I'd really like to figure out.

      thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • thanksajdotcomT
        thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        This is a really weird issue that I'd really like to figure out.

        I would like to know why as well but it's not worth my time. If having one of each virtual NIC fixes it on Virtualbox, so be it. I have other things to worry about...lol

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @thanksajdotcom
          last edited by

          @ajstringham said:.

          I would like to know why as well but it's not worth my time. If having one of each virtual NIC fixes it on Virtualbox, so be it. I have other things to worry about...lol

          Actually, you talked about moving it. So this kind of hack is a really bad idea. If you are just moving the web directory, then that is different. Either way, this means something is seriously wrong. That is not a good sign for the health of the VirtualBox install itself.

          scottalanmillerS thanksajdotcomT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
            last edited by

            @JaredBusch said:

            @ajstringham said:.

            I would like to know why as well but it's not worth my time. If having one of each virtual NIC fixes it on Virtualbox, so be it. I have other things to worry about...lol

            Actually, you talked about moving it. So this kind of hack is a really bad idea. If you are just moving the web directory, then that is different. Either way, this means something is seriously wrong. That is not a good sign for the health of the VirtualBox install itself.

            I doubt it is VBox related. Probably just an odd network config.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • thanksajdotcomT
              thanksajdotcom @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said:

              @ajstringham said:.

              I would like to know why as well but it's not worth my time. If having one of each virtual NIC fixes it on Virtualbox, so be it. I have other things to worry about...lol

              Actually, you talked about moving it. So this kind of hack is a really bad idea. If you are just moving the web directory, then that is different. Either way, this means something is seriously wrong. That is not a good sign for the health of the VirtualBox install itself.

              I actually updated to the absolute latest version of Virtualbox right before I started the whole process, so I honestly don't know why it'd be a Virtualbox issue...I might try rebuilding the entire VM, from the VMDK up.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                last edited by

                @ajstringham Got for the RC of CentOS 7. Get the maximum value from the effort.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • thanksajdotcomT
                  thanksajdotcom
                  last edited by

                  I'll do that now.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                    last edited by

                    @ajstringham said:

                    I'll do that now.

                    Awesome. CentOS 7 is looking pretty good. I've got one instance running. New thing.... default filesystem is XFS!

                    thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @ajstringham said:

                      I'll do that now.

                      Awesome. CentOS 7 is looking pretty good. I've got one instance running. New thing.... default filesystem is XFS!

                      I'm creating the VMDK now. My only concern is that, all my research suggests Ubuntu is the best distro to run a LAMP server on. I'm also much more familiar with Debian systems over RPM...

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @ajstringham said:

                        I'm creating the VMDK now. My only concern is that, all my research suggests Ubuntu is the best distro to run a LAMP server on. I'm also much more familiar with Debian systems over RPM...

                        RHEL has always been the LAMP leader. No upside to Ubuntu for LAMP. That's not where Ubuntu is strong. Ubuntu is better for alternative, non-LAMP, application stacks like RoR and Node.js where RHEL's conservative approach is a major problem.

                        Other than needing the EPEL enabled, RHEL is as straightforward as you really get for LAMP. Ubuntu has only squeaked by as being even a reasonable choice until the latest few releases.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 2 / 2
                        • First post
                          Last post