Windows Licensing and VPS
-
@thwr said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@thwr said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@thwr said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@thwr said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
Datacenter licensing and good contracts?
Pushing risk to the customer, is what it is. DC isn't an option for service providers. So by using it, you have to buy Windows licenses and pay for their entire cloud to be covered.
Only heard good things about them up to this point. But before we start guessing.. I know someone who knows someone who knows... one of the Contabo guys. Maybe he can bring some light into this.
Only so much light to bring, we know that Datacenter licensing can't be used in this way. That that is listed, tells us what we need to know.
OK, my bad... just talked to a friend, thought he knew a Contabo representative, but I was wrong. Sorry.
Maybe just write them a mail and ask for their licensing model?
But they published the licensing. MS has been very clear on this point, there isn't any ambiguity or anything to ask. What do you expect us to ask them? "Excuse me, but clearly you aren't providing MS licenses properly, is that an accident or are just just lying?"
If you think that they are abusing Microsoft licenses, feel free to report them. I do know nothing about VPS and hoster licensing, not my business.
They might be in China for all I know, and out of reach of Microsoft's legal team. Doesn't matter, it is the customers who are liable, not the host. So whether they are or not is irrelevant. It's warning people not to be tricked into thinking that they can safely use them that is important.
-
Interesting... The more cores you have, the more the windows licensing costs...
-
@aaronstuder said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
Interesting... The more cores you have, the more the windows licensing costs...
That's odd. Since that's not how Microsoft charges VPS providers.
-
Amazon seems to be able to do it
-
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
But Amazon has Datacenter on the systems through EC2 as far as I hosted Windows Servers there.
-
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
But Amazon has Datacenter on the systems through EC2 as far as I hosted Windows Servers there.
Are you sure that they are DC not SPLA?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
But Amazon has Datacenter on the systems through EC2 as far as I hosted Windows Servers there.
Are you sure that they are DC not SPLA?
It is SPLA https://aws.amazon.com/windows/faq/
-
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
But Amazon has Datacenter on the systems through EC2 as far as I hosted Windows Servers there.
Are you sure that they are DC not SPLA?
It is SPLA https://aws.amazon.com/windows/faq/
Right, that's the key difference. Amazon uses SPLA, like Vultr does, and clearly covers the cost of it. These others, say Datacenter instead of SPLA, and don't cover the costs.
It's the combination of claiming a different license and being absurdly cheap, too cheap to pay for SPLA, that is the tip off.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
But Amazon has Datacenter on the systems through EC2 as far as I hosted Windows Servers there.
Are you sure that they are DC not SPLA?
It is SPLA https://aws.amazon.com/windows/faq/
Right, that's the key difference. Amazon uses SPLA, like Vultr does, and clearly covers the cost of it. These others, say Datacenter instead of SPLA, and don't cover the costs.
It's the combination of claiming a different license and being absurdly cheap, too cheap to pay for SPLA, that is the tip off.
What I should have clarified was that the Servers are running on Datacenter Edition regardless if they have SPLA or not using EC2.
-
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@dbeato said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@scottalanmiller said in Windows Licensing and VPS:
@aaronstuder seems to do what? Amazon is NOT claiming to do Datacenter licensing, it is SPLA. And if you look at how tiny those instances are, they are definitely charging the normal Windows amount for them. So nothing like any of the ones that we've been questioning. It is, in fact, these Amazon numbers that make us realize how far off the other vendors are that are not charging plausible rates for Windows.
But Amazon has Datacenter on the systems through EC2 as far as I hosted Windows Servers there.
Are you sure that they are DC not SPLA?
It is SPLA https://aws.amazon.com/windows/faq/
Right, that's the key difference. Amazon uses SPLA, like Vultr does, and clearly covers the cost of it. These others, say Datacenter instead of SPLA, and don't cover the costs.
It's the combination of claiming a different license and being absurdly cheap, too cheap to pay for SPLA, that is the tip off.
What I should have clarified was that the Servers are running on Datacenter Edition regardless if they have SPLA or not using EC2.
Ah, I see. Yes, DCE vs DCL.
