UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue
-
@JaredBusch so when I look at this config, basically the wireless was going to require the USG for a dhcp server, but since we don't have one, and even though it has 192.168.1.1/24 for the network, I'm on my phone and I'm getting a 10.x.x.x ip so I think that should be fine. Wierd but fine. I'm disabling the DHCP server on the WLAN side for the Controller. Doesn't make sense to have it!
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@JaredBusch & @dbeato I think a trip to the local brewery will be in order soon. The Office WLAN should use the dhcp server of the Windows box. At this point I don't see the point of the Guest LAN since apparently, people are logging into the main one ;( now that I can see the logs!
Gonna nuke the guest and re-do this one later.
Of course it is, it is already after noon!
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@JaredBusch & @dbeato I think a trip to the local brewery will be in order soon. The Office WLAN should use the dhcp server of the Windows box. At this point I don't see the point of the Guest LAN since apparently, people are logging into the main one ;( now that I can see the logs!
Gonna nuke the guest and re-do this one later.
LOL, never too late
The Guest LAN is something that you would use if configured on any SSID -
@dbeato I agree, but I'd like to cut down on the "why is my wifi not working" so I can redo it properly
-
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
Those clients have a gateway of 10.10.3.1 or 10.10.4.1.
-
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
Those clients have a gateway of 10.10.3.1 or 10.10.4.1.
Exactly - to fix those clients, you need to change their gateway to whatever you want the single gateway IP to be. Then you could get rid of those extra IPs on the ER interface.
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, ...
I might have missed this, but why do you have multiple networks on a single LAN?
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
Set up in what way on the Windows Server? Why does Windows Server need configuration for subnets it is not on?
What's the purpose of the different subnets?
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
He only actually has two subnets.
10.10.0.0/22 and 10.10.4.0/24 -
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
He only actually has two subnets.
10.10.0.0/22 and 10.10.4.0/24Then that still is not good.
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
He only actually has two subnets.
10.10.0.0/22 and 10.10.4.0/24Then that still is not good.
Exactly, and he's shown that he has many DHCP scopes scooped up into a SuperScope. all of that needs to be deleted and a new single zone for the 10.10.0.0/22 needs to be created.
-
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
No he isn't. He has a large subnet and a small subnet.
The large subnet has multiple gateways assigned on various computers for unknown reasons, but it is just 1 large subnet.
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
-
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
I posted pictures of it earlier, no need for maths..
https://i.imgur.com/QzDJIga.png -
Looking back at the config in the first post - it appears that whoever set this up felt that they needed more than /22 on the single network, so they tossed on the 10.10.4.0/24 to give 256 more addresses to that space - why they didn't just go to 10.10.0.0/21 I don't understand.
-
Deleted.
-
@dashrender Because that would take it to 10.10.7.255
