ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Attempting to increase the size of a Linux LVM Disk

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    40 Posts 5 Posters 2.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RamblingBipedR
      RamblingBiped
      last edited by RamblingBiped

      Growing Logical Volumes: https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Cluster_Logical_Volume_Manager/lv_extend.html

      https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/lv_extend.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • travisdh1T
        travisdh1
        last edited by

        Let's see if I can remember this without looking anything up this time...

        pvcreate /dev/new_drive
        vgextend vg_name /dev/new_drive
        lvextend lv_name -l 100%FREE
        

        Dang, I forget the ones to extend the file system 😞

        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • wirestyle22W
          wirestyle22 @travisdh1
          last edited by wirestyle22

          @travisdh1 My problem is LVS and VGS displays the right amout of space.PVS displays two PV's in the same VG, both at 1.95TB but nothing is listed as VFree.

          vgs
          0_1490308997512_Capture14.JPG

          lvs
          0_1490308961419_Capture13.JPG

          pvs
          0_1490308919558_Capture12.JPG

          df -h
          0_1490308770233_Capture11.JPG

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Have you expanded the filesystem yet?

            wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • wirestyle22W
              wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
              last edited by wirestyle22

              @scottalanmiller

              resize2fs /dev/mapper/centos-root

              [root@localhost ~]# resize2fs /dev/mapper/centos-root 3.91T
              resize2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
              resize2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/mapper/centos-root
              Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                That's not good. Try it with the -p flag.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  What filesystem do you have? Could it be XFS?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    If XFS the command syntax is...

                    xfs_growfs /mount/point -D size
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      It's XenServer, we are expecting EXT4 here, right?

                      wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • wirestyle22W
                        wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by wirestyle22

                        @scottalanmiller Correct

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • wirestyle22W
                          wirestyle22
                          last edited by wirestyle22

                          Is this improper syntax?

                          0_1490310743055_whatever.JPG

                          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stacksofplatesS
                            stacksofplates @wirestyle22
                            last edited by

                            @wirestyle22 said in Attempting to increase the size of a Linux LVM Disk:

                            Is this improper syntax?

                            0_1490310743055_whatever.JPG

                            Try +3.91.

                            Also, why not have the data on its own volume? It's more flexible that way.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stacksofplatesS
                              stacksofplates
                              last edited by

                              If the +doesn't work you will have to add it to the existing size. So if its 5TB it would be 8.91

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                Just appears that the size is too small.

                                wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • wirestyle22W
                                  wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller That confuses me because each is 1.9T

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                                    last edited by scottalanmiller

                                    @wirestyle22 said in Attempting to increase the size of a Linux LVM Disk:

                                    @scottalanmiller That confuses me because each is 1.9T

                                    Why? Your total from your LVS command looks like 3.89TB but you are trying to expand to 3.91TB.

                                    wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • wirestyle22W
                                      wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by wirestyle22

                                      @scottalanmiller LVS is 3.89T

                                      0_1490314853970_LVS.JPG

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        I edited while you were typing. I read the wrong field. But it is still too small. The FS must be smaller than the container holding it.

                                        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • wirestyle22W
                                          wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Attempting to increase the size of a Linux LVM Disk:

                                          I edited while you were typing. I read the wrong field. But it is still too small. The FS must be smaller than the container holding it.

                                          How much smaller? even 3.86 kicks back the same error

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                                            last edited by

                                            @wirestyle22 said in Attempting to increase the size of a Linux LVM Disk:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Attempting to increase the size of a Linux LVM Disk:

                                            I edited while you were typing. I read the wrong field. But it is still too small. The FS must be smaller than the container holding it.

                                            How much smaller? even 3.86 kicks back the same error

                                            Try something like 3.4TB. Remember FS overhead.

                                            wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post