I can't even
-
@dustinb3403 said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@bigbear said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
That's mostly tongue in cheek, but only mostly.
Cisco wasn't his choice, nor Meraki...
I gotta get back to my desktop and read closer. I did see your point though originally. And is it only recommends to use PAP?
Didn't say it was. But his question was was it good for Cisco to make that decision, but the real question is... why did someone choose Cisco if it didn't meet the needs?
The real question is, why the hell is this the "configuration method" that is recommended by Cisco.
Not "why did someone choose cisco if it doesn't meed the needs".
That is a derailment from the question I have, which is "wtf is this doing, if it is clearly wrong?!"
I'm sure there's some context ties to an old support ticket where someone said something meraki recommended wasn't secure and then some engineer updated the article, etc
-
Crazy people with emotional reactions to the name IoT when no IoT exists, and people fearing Windows 10 compared to 7. WTF people?
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
when no IoT exists, and people fearing Windows 10 compared to 7. WTF people?
What does IoT even mean in this case? I've always been unclear on it..
-
@dave247 said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
when no IoT exists, and people fearing Windows 10 compared to 7. WTF people?
What does IoT even mean in this case? I've always been unclear on it..
IoT is the name of the OS version. There is no IoT involved in his use case.
-
@dave247 said in I can't even:
What does IoT even mean in this case? I've always been unclear on it..
IoT is not a real term, it doesn't mean anything specific. It's a loose reference to devices that you'd not expect to be computing devices that are networked, but are. POS doesn't fall into that category. Your toaster, microwave, or fridge would. A sensor in your attic might. Thermostats really can't be considered this any longer, they are full computing devices and expected to be so, now. So they've left IoT, IMHO.
IoT is a useless term based around the cluelessness or expectations of the observer. It is always subjective and can't be used in any technical context.
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@dave247 said in I can't even:
What does IoT even mean in this case? I've always been unclear on it..
IoT is not a real term, it doesn't mean anything specific. It's a loose reference to devices that you'd not expect to be computing devices that are networked, but are. POS doesn't fall into that category. Your toaster, microwave, or fridge would. A sensor in your attic might. Thermostats really can't be considered this any longer, they are full computing devices and expected to be so, now. So they've left IoT, IMHO.
IoT is a useless term based around the cluelessness or expectations of the observer. It is always subjective and can't be used in any technical context.
Lmao, I love it. I always though it seemed like an odd/vague term.
-
@dave247 said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@dave247 said in I can't even:
What does IoT even mean in this case? I've always been unclear on it..
IoT is not a real term, it doesn't mean anything specific. It's a loose reference to devices that you'd not expect to be computing devices that are networked, but are. POS doesn't fall into that category. Your toaster, microwave, or fridge would. A sensor in your attic might. Thermostats really can't be considered this any longer, they are full computing devices and expected to be so, now. So they've left IoT, IMHO.
IoT is a useless term based around the cluelessness or expectations of the observer. It is always subjective and can't be used in any technical context.
Lmao, I love it. I always though it seemed like an odd/vague term.
I need to make a video on it.
-
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.
-
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
-
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
Nah. I'd just have her machine setup so I could SSH in as root. Nobody has time for that
sudobusiness.
-
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
Nah. I'd just have her machine setup so I could SSH in as root. Nobody has time for that
sudobusiness.any how come none of you asshats tagged me in that thread!! /hate /grumble /wtfever
-
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
Nah. I'd just have her machine setup so I could SSH in as root. Nobody has time for that
sudobusiness.any how come none of you asshats tagged me in that thread!! /hate /grumble /wtfever
I assumed it was beneath your paygrade.
-
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
Nah. I'd just have her machine setup so I could SSH in as root. Nobody has time for that
sudobusiness.any how come none of you asshats tagged me in that thread!! /hate /grumble /wtfever
I assumed it was beneath your paygrade.
I actually didn't read all the posts. Just added on tot he pile to not call local.
THen invited her to come out to the local SPiceCorp meetup tonight. -
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
Nah. I'd just have her machine setup so I could SSH in as root. Nobody has time for that
sudobusiness.any how come none of you asshats tagged me in that thread!! /hate /grumble /wtfever
I assumed it was beneath your paygrade.
I actually didn't read all the posts. Just added on tot he pile to not call local.
THen invited her to come out to the local SPiceCorp meetup tonight.I didn't even touch that thread. All I know is what is in this thread.
-
@jaredbusch said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
@nerdydad said in I can't even:
@eddiejennings said in I can't even:
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2081111-looking-for-local-centos-support
I can run
sudo yum update -y. I should be her CentOS guy.FTFY
Nah. I'd just have her machine setup so I could SSH in as root. Nobody has time for that
sudobusiness.any how come none of you asshats tagged me in that thread!! /hate /grumble /wtfever
She was being weird, I didn't want to subject anyone to that. LOL
-
Claims he knows nothing about what a CAL is. But also claims that he knows that he's never needed them. How he can know so little but then know so much... makes no sense. He's an IT Service Provider, but doesn't know the most basic things about using Windows.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2085827-what-exactly-is-a-cal
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Claims he knows nothing about what a CAL is. But also claims that he knows that he's never needed them. How he can know so little but then know so much... makes no sense. He's an IT Service Provider, but doesn't know the most basic things about using Windows.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2085827-what-exactly-is-a-cal
"What exactly is a CAL?"
A reason not to use Windows.
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Claims he knows nothing about what a CAL is. But also claims that he knows that he's never needed them. How he can know so little but then know so much... makes no sense. He's an IT Service Provider, but doesn't know the most basic things about using Windows.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2085827-what-exactly-is-a-cal
Probably managing very small environments where he has never had more than 10 connections. I am not sure Windows Server governs CALs very closely, or at all if you dont configure it.
-
@bigbear said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Claims he knows nothing about what a CAL is. But also claims that he knows that he's never needed them. How he can know so little but then know so much... makes no sense. He's an IT Service Provider, but doesn't know the most basic things about using Windows.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2085827-what-exactly-is-a-cal
Probably managing very small environments where he has never had more than 10 connections. I am not sure Windows Server governs CALs very closely, or at all if you dont configure it.
From my experirence with Windows Server (not using remote desktop services), there's no technical limitations regarding CALs. It's pure licensing costs (and revenue).
-
@bigbear said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
Claims he knows nothing about what a CAL is. But also claims that he knows that he's never needed them. How he can know so little but then know so much... makes no sense. He's an IT Service Provider, but doesn't know the most basic things about using Windows.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2085827-what-exactly-is-a-cal
Probably managing very small environments where he has never had more than 10 connections. I am not sure Windows Server governs CALs very closely, or at all if you dont configure it.
It doesn't govern them AT ALL. And you need CALs regardless of the size of your environment, so size doesn't matter. He claims to have used Windows Server and that means he has to know CALs (either because he directly had to buy them or he had to choose Windows Server versions that specifically allowed him to work without them.) It's that you install Windows Server is the act that requires that you be aware of CALs.
