Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I could combine the above and just use normal Windows Remote Desktop, but I would have to maintain my own user account on the server,
How else do you audit the access? You need a CAL regardless as you are a user.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
And all this needs set up in a way where the owner has to grant access so that I don't have any-time access for liability reasons.
I don't agree here. I think that that is silly. Good controls and he knows if you have accessed or not. If you dont have those, you have the liability regardless. If he has to grant you access, how will he do that when things are broken? Often it'll mean that you can't get in when needed.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I could create some kind of dedicated jump box that only I have access to which then allows me in to various things over local network. Not sure how this works. Is it Linux? Can I still use the Windows VM gui?
We use LInux. What is a Windows VM GUI?
I just mean if I use Linux, Ubuntu or something, can I still use the Windows GUI or would I be stuck with command line stuff?
Do you use a GUI on Linux? Mint or something? Fedora? I just mean I want full desktop access to Windows.@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I could combine the above and just use normal Windows Remote Desktop, but I would have to maintain my own user account on the server,
How else do you audit the access? You need a CAL regardless as you are a user.
Win Essentials here.
@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
And all this needs set up in a way where the owner has to grant access so that I don't have any-time access for liability reasons.
I don't agree here. I think that that is silly. Good controls and he knows if you have accessed or not. If you dont have those, you have the liability regardless. If he has to grant you access, how will he do that when things are broken? Often it'll mean that you can't get in when needed.
Of course true.
The liability is if his business ever suffers a data loss or data theft or even remote hacks, that nobody can point a finger at me thinking it must have come through my access. If that is just tin foil thinking, then ya, I'd much rather have full access any time, as needed.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I just mean if I use Linux, Ubuntu or something, can I still use the Windows GUI or would I be stuck with command line stuff?
Do you use a GUI on Linux? Mint or something? Fedora? I just mean I want full desktop access to Windows.You can but I rarely would. Just launch whatever tool you need directly. Like if you want to use Remmina to access RDP, just launch Remmina alone, not an entire desktop.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
How else do you audit the access? You need a CAL regardless as you are a user.
Win Essentials here.
CALs are requried the same regardless. In any case, you are consuming one of their "seats", might as well take advantage of the auditing that it brings.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
The liability is if his business ever suffers a data loss or data theft or even remote hacks, that nobody can point a finger at me thinking it must have come through my access. If that is just tin foil thinking, then ya, I'd much rather have full access any time, as needed.
Bottom line is people will lie and blame you anyway. Might as well at least be useful and have auditing. Otherwise, how do you even prove that you didn't have access? They'll just say that you did.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
The liability is if his business ever suffers a data loss or data theft or even remote hacks, that nobody can point a finger at me thinking it must have come through my access. If that is just tin foil thinking, then ya, I'd much rather have full access any time, as needed.
Bottom line is people will lie and blame you anyway. Might as well at least be useful and have auditing. Otherwise, how do you even prove that you didn't have access? They'll just say that you did.
This is true. The person in question is a good dude, I'm just being overly paranoid probably.
I am also a sucker for tools. I like to play with new things, especially if they are free!
Speaking of that, what's the best free option for Win Essentials anyway?
-
I get the feeling that we might not be on the same page.
When you use TeamViewer or ScreenConnect, etc, to take over the owners computer, you could use that computer to access the iDRAC or any other IP services on their LAN.
You wouldn't need to worry about changing any routes or IPs, etc. The same would mostly be said if you use something like a jumpbox. This server, normally based on a free linux server, is published through the firewall onto the internet where you can access it remotely. You connect to the jump server, then use tools like RDP from linux to connect to your Windows server, or a web browser to access iDRAC, etc. -
@Dashrender said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I get the feeling that we might not be on the same page.
When you use TeamViewer or ScreenConnect, etc, to take over the owners computer, you could use that computer to access the iDRAC or any other IP services on their LAN.
You wouldn't need to worry about changing any routes or IPs, etc. The same would mostly be said if you use something like a jumpbox. This server, normally based on a free linux server, is published through the firewall onto the internet where you can access it remotely. You connect to the jump server, then use tools like RDP from linux to connect to your Windows server, or a web browser to access iDRAC, etc.Ya that makes sense, but same rules apply. I don't necessarily want hands-off remote control of his workstation either.
I was thinking more along the lines of a remote tool directly to Win Server on the VM. Or connect to XS and use a console view or something for VM(s).At another location I have a server with XS and I have XO running on a VM. I've just found using XC to be nicer than XO.
I guess if I had my way, I would want this:
- I open my super secret client control panel.
- Find client and auth into that individually.
- Inside client control, find server or device I can remotely control and monitor.
- Select to remote control it or change something. Go to work.
Like a master control panel of all clients, and all system under those clients which I can control or monitor.
My master control panel would, of course, notify me of danger on monitored devices.I suppose MSPs have cool things like that.
-
@Dashrender said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
What about Google Chrome Remoting?
The tool doesn't matter. It depends on the issue. What if it's the case that the VM is down but Xen is accessible? I could fix it that way if I had access to Xen.
To get to that level, we use a Jump server.
I don't understand how you get web gui access with a Jump server.
SSH Tunnel
-
This is the most long and drawn out thread for something simple:
- I feel like you are doing this for free or really cheap. If that is the case...walk away immediately. You sound like a young, excitable guy. I was there once, but after you get used a few times. You won't be so willing to help for nothing or very little.
- Pick a remote control tool. I've used Deskroll in the past and it is really nice because the user can launch a one time .exe file and has the option to install the client at the end so you always have access. If they prefer not to, then that's ok too. You can just send them the .exe everytime you need access.
- I think you don't need idrac access. I think you are being way too paranoid. You are talking about a business with 6 computers. If they are paying you by the incident then make them sweat a little. Otherwise they see you fix the problem in 10 or 15 minutes and they don't appreciate your work. You can always remote in and gain SSH access if you need to do so. If everything is too easy and streamline they will never realize your value. Many small businesses think IT is a waste of money anyway.
-
@IRJ said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
This is the most long and drawn out thread for something simple:
- I feel like you are doing this for free or really cheap. If that is the case...walk away immediately. You sound like a young, excitable guy. I was there once, but after you get used a few times. You won't be so willing to help for nothing or very little.
- Pick a remote control tool. I've used Deskroll in the past and it is really nice because the user can launch a one time .exe file and has the option to install the client at the end so you always have access. If they prefer not to, then that's ok too. You can just send them the .exe everytime you need access.
- I think you don't need idrac access. I think you are being way too paranoid. You are talking about a business with 6 computers. If they are paying you by the incident then make them sweat a little. Otherwise they see you fix the problem in 10 or 15 minutes and they don't appreciate your work. You can always remote in and gain SSH access if you need to do so. If everything is too easy and streamline they will never realize your value. Many small businesses think IT is a waste of money anyway.
Everything here.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I suppose MSPs have cool things like that.
This is often in your RMM suite.
-
Getting remote access is always a weird subject. Are you their support or not? If so, you need access, always. If not, their support needs the skills to get you access when it is needed. You need to really determine the goal.
-
@IRJ said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
This is the most long and drawn out thread for something simple:
- I feel like you are doing this for free or really cheap. If that is the case...walk away immediately. You sound like a young, excitable guy. I was there once, but after you get used a few times. You won't be so willing to help for nothing or very little.
- Pick a remote control tool. I've used Deskroll in the past and it is really nice because the user can launch a one time .exe file and has the option to install the client at the end so you always have access. If they prefer not to, then that's ok too. You can just send them the .exe everytime you need access.
- I think you don't need idrac access. I think you are being way too paranoid. You are talking about a business with 6 computers. If they are paying you by the incident then make them sweat a little. Otherwise they see you fix the problem in 10 or 15 minutes and they don't appreciate your work. You can always remote in and gain SSH access if you need to do so. If everything is too easy and streamline they will never realize your value. Many small businesses think IT is a waste of money anyway.
I appreciate the sentiments, but nothing is ever that easy. For every situation, 52 techs will give 52 different options which are their favorite. Deskroll has not been mentioned once before, I've never even heard of it!
iDRAC is probably overkill. Just figure if it's there, might as well enable it and leave the option open eh? I can ignore it for now. I only worked on their previous server twice in a year, so these things are pretty stable anyway.
I'm not doing the job for free or anything, but I try to avoid telling them that along with their upgraded server that will do the exact same thing as the old one, they now have to make monthly payments to some service they never needed before. Or on the flip side, I don't want to personally make payments for a new tool I may use for them once a year.
You are right about this being drawn out. It's just a conversation, talking about tools and techniques. I never needed to start this thread at all. I could have just stuck TeamViewer on there and called it good. But it never hurts to ask questions and see what's new, what people are using, what tools I haven't heard of, and how other people do the same things.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I appreciate the sentiments, but nothing is ever that easy. For every situation, 52 techs will give 52 different options which are their favorite. Deskroll has not been mentioned once before, I've never even heard of it!
That's not confusing the answer is simple. 51 are wrong and I'm right. Where have you been?
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
iDRAC is probably overkill. Just figure if it's there, might as well enable it and leave the option open eh? I can ignore it for now. I only worked on their previous server twice in a year, so these things are pretty stable anyway.
IF there, yes. If it is already there, we would assume that after paying that much for it that they would have enabled it, too. But you never know.
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
You are right about this being drawn out. It's just a conversation, talking about tools and techniques. I never needed to start this thread at all. I could have just stuck TeamViewer on there and called it good. But it never hurts to ask questions and see what's new, what people are using, what tools I haven't heard of, and how other people do the same things.
We found ScreenConnect to be more cost effective than TV. We like SC a lot.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
Getting remote access is always a weird subject. Are you their support or not? If so, you need access, always. If not, their support needs the skills to get you access when it is needed. You need to really determine the goal.
Yes I am their support as far as break/fix and upgrades. The only other support is their copier guy, and their medical software support people.
My issue is that, while I typically do all their support, I don't have any kind of retainer fee or contract or policies regarding maintaining any kind of remote control.
Is it typical to create a contract for this for liability reasons? Or just a handshake on "hey I can get in the server whenever I want, cool with you?"
If there is a contract for this, I'd like to see a sample or what that might look like. And for that reason, why not give myself access to every workstation in there while I'm at it?
-
@guyinpv said in Best way to maintain some remote control but not absolute?:
I'm not doing the job for free or anything, but I try to avoid telling them that along with their upgraded server that will do the exact same thing as the old one, they now have to make monthly payments to some service they never needed before. Or on the flip side, I don't want to personally make payments for a new tool I may use for them once a year.
One of the things that we struggle with (we being NTG) is balancing between "this is what the customer does" and "this is what we do."
We use and provide ScreenConnect. But lots of customers have their own policies, products, etc. We have an RMM tool, but not many customers on it. We have jump servers, but only with certain customers. It's complicated.
I think one thing you have to decide is... are you an MSP (you determine the tools) or are you an ITSP/Consultant (they determine the tools much of the time?)
