What Are You Doing Right Now
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
I can't believe how many people let end users manage their own computer just because it is remote.
yeah, that is a bizarre one.
I'm starting to realize that most IT pros are ignorant, and somehow just got into the field. I also think this might be why I have trouble getting some job offers, because they don't want to hire someone smarter than them.. Not that I'm all that smart.
I've struggled at many a job because of that...I don't do well with limiting the scope of my vision. That is one way that NTG was both good and bad for me. At NTG, if it was on the network, we handled it. The job after that, I was a glorified secretary. Have an issue with this product? Call the vendor. That product? Call the vendor? Need something on their phone system tweaked? Schedule a tech from another vendor. We didn't actually get to work on much directly. Going from the one extreme to another was a HUGE system shock and ultimately why it didn't work out there.
NTG spoiled me in the "you see an issue, fix it" style of work. Granted, if there was something to RMA, etc, we'd reach out to the manufacturer. Or if it was a TWC issue, we'd work with them. But the whole thing about just calling all these different vendors and techs, made me realize how unique NTG is in their "one-stop shop" mentality. Not how most businesses handle things. I don't think most businesses have enough confidence in their techs to do that.
-
@thanksajdotcom That is the situation I am in -- kinda. At my last job, I had my hand in all the cookie jars... At my new employer, I am a Systems Administrator only... We have a lot of nice Cisco Networking gear that I could quickly fix issues on, but I am a System Administrator, not part of the Networking Team. (Sadly, all of our IT Functions are siloed like that... it breaks my heart).
I do like my bosses and folks that I work with, so that is a plus!
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
I can't believe how many people let end users manage their own computer just because it is remote.
yeah, that is a bizarre one.
I'm starting to realize that most IT pros are ignorant, and somehow just got into the field. I also think this might be why I have trouble getting some job offers, because they don't want to hire someone smarter than them.. Not that I'm all that smart.
I've struggled at many a job because of that...I don't do well with limiting the scope of my vision. That is one way that NTG was both good and bad for me. At NTG, if it was on the network, we handled it. The job after that, I was a glorified secretary. Have an issue with this product? Call the vendor. That product? Call the vendor? Need something on their phone system tweaked? Schedule a tech from another vendor. We didn't actually get to work on much directly. Going from the one extreme to another was a HUGE system shock and ultimately why it didn't work out there.
NTG spoiled me in the "you see an issue, fix it" style of work. Granted, if there was something to RMA, etc, we'd reach out to the manufacturer. Or if it was a TWC issue, we'd work with them. But the whole thing about just calling all these different vendors and techs, made me realize how unique NTG is in their "one-stop shop" mentality. Not how most businesses handle things. I don't think most businesses have enough confidence in their techs to do that.
I've never had that issue. Once I get in the door most usually let me put my hands in a little of everything once they get to know me.
-
Sadly, this is a state level job, so yeah, I don't see that happening any time soon, lol.
-
@dafyre said:
Sadly, this is a state level job, so yeah, I don't see that happening any time soon, lol.
Guess it depends on the state.
-
@dafyre said:
@thanksajdotcom That is the situation I am in -- kinda. At my last job, I had my hand in all the cookie jars... At my new employer, I am a Systems Administrator only... We have a lot of nice Cisco Networking gear that I could quickly fix issues on, but I am a System Administrator, not part of the Networking Team. (Sadly, all of our IT Functions are siloed like that... it breaks my heart).
I do like my bosses and folks that I work with, so that is a plus!
It's also the issue I'm running into at Staples, although with a slightly different spin. One, we don't do much of the tech work in-house anymore. We connect it up to Staples techs who work out of a call-center somewhere in the USA. This means I don't get to do much hands-on tech work anymore, which drives me nuts. I also lost my two assistant managers who backed me up on all my calls. It had gotten to the point at Staples where they trusted me so much that if I made a call on something or felt something needed to be done a certain way, the default was just to accept my call and move on. If they wanted more info, they'd ask but as a rule, my word was as good as a manager's with 90% of stuff.
The reason I struggle with the current system is mostly because the way I handled things worked out well for all parties: the store, the customer and Staples as a whole. Customers were always thrilled with their customer service, Staples and the store made out well in terms of good referrals, good CSAT scores, and increased revenue. The issue is that my new assistant managers don't understand my style, haven't seen it work over several years, and also do things very differently. The problem is that what they do is self-destructive to the store, and that's more than I can deal with.
I'm very used to just dealing with everything in the tech department and my current sales manager is on a power trip (not just with me and those aren't just my words) and wants to micro-manage everything but in a way that's totally wrong. The only positive is that my GM has my back 100% and while my sales manager thinks he's got me on the ropes, he doesn't realize that he's not even close. So that's good. However, my GM retires in five years, after which my time at Staples will permanently be done.
-
@thanksajdotcom Give it a chance... Maybe you'll get a new GM who is also halfway decent... and one who can fire the Sales manager....
-
@dafyre said:
@thanksajdotcom That is the situation I am in -- kinda. At my last job, I had my hand in all the cookie jars... At my new employer, I am a Systems Administrator only... We have a lot of nice Cisco Networking gear that I could quickly fix issues on, but I am a System Administrator, not part of the Networking Team. (Sadly, all of our IT Functions are siloed like that... it breaks my heart).
I do like my bosses and folks that I work with, so that is a plus!
Welcome to the enterprise space
-
@dafyre said:
Sadly, this is a state level job, so yeah, I don't see that happening any time soon, lol.
I've rarely seen any large company not like that.
-
@dafyre said:
@thanksajdotcom Give it a chance... Maybe you'll get a new GM who is also halfway decent... and one who can fire the Sales manager....
Sadly the only one who can fire the sales manager is the district manager, and he's a bigger idiot than the sales manager (and that's saying something). But no, even if I got a new GM who was great, the standard rule is that once a GM leaves, the stuff who were tenured under him kind of just leave too. There are only really three of us left who are tenured under my current GM. In five years, I can guarantee none of us will be there anymore.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@dafyre said:
Sadly, this is a state level job, so yeah, I don't see that happening any time soon, lol.
I've rarely seen any large company not like that.
We're semi-large here (4,000 ish employees depending on season). But we have cross over. Technician's don't. But most of us as Linux Admins also do networking too. We also have server techs on top of the desktop techs that don't have cross over either they just rack stuff and deal with physical hardware and cabling in the DC (granted they will rack switches, routers and replace them too so maybe it is cross over). We have around 100 Linux VMs per Admin (and many of us are contract).
-
@dafyre, the flip side to my GM not being able to fire my sales manager, despite how much he wants to, is that my sales manager cannot fire me without my GM's approval, and that will never happen. Even if my sales manager writes me up, my GM has to sign off on it to approve the write-up, and if it's not reviewed with me by both the GM and sales manager within a certain time frame it invalidates the write-up. My GM can basically use a filibuster technique to invalidate write-ups that way. I'm sorry but I get a chuckle out of that.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
I can't believe how many people let end users manage their own computer just because it is remote.
yeah, that is a bizarre one.
I'm starting to realize that most IT pros are ignorant, and somehow just got into the field. I also think this might be why I have trouble getting some job offers, because they don't want to hire someone smarter than them.. Not that I'm all that smart.
I've struggled at many a job because of that...I don't do well with limiting the scope of my vision. That is one way that NTG was both good and bad for me. At NTG, if it was on the network, we handled it. The job after that, I was a glorified secretary. Have an issue with this product? Call the vendor. That product? Call the vendor? Need something on their phone system tweaked? Schedule a tech from another vendor. We didn't actually get to work on much directly. Going from the one extreme to another was a HUGE system shock and ultimately why it didn't work out there.
NTG spoiled me in the "you see an issue, fix it" style of work. Granted, if there was something to RMA, etc, we'd reach out to the manufacturer. Or if it was a TWC issue, we'd work with them. But the whole thing about just calling all these different vendors and techs, made me realize how unique NTG is in their "one-stop shop" mentality. Not how most businesses handle things. I don't think most businesses have enough confidence in their techs to do that.
I wonder how much of this came from me because I came from a background of "you never call the vendor." Not that you literally would never call, but you only call when it is their fault (bug in code or whatever.) You never ask them to do the IT job for the IT people - if you do, you aren't the IT person but just a vendor coordinator. I've never worked in a place where it was culturally acceptable to turn to the vendor for IT tasks that are the IT department's responsibility. I've carried that on. You lose a lot of advantages when you do that (delays, lack of cohesive vision, etc.)
It is only since joining some online communities that I even learned that there were vendors that would participate in this and would do IT work or handhold in the way that they do.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
I can't believe how many people let end users manage their own computer just because it is remote.
yeah, that is a bizarre one.
I'm starting to realize that most IT pros are ignorant, and somehow just got into the field. I also think this might be why I have trouble getting some job offers, because they don't want to hire someone smarter than them.. Not that I'm all that smart.
I've struggled at many a job because of that...I don't do well with limiting the scope of my vision. That is one way that NTG was both good and bad for me. At NTG, if it was on the network, we handled it. The job after that, I was a glorified secretary. Have an issue with this product? Call the vendor. That product? Call the vendor? Need something on their phone system tweaked? Schedule a tech from another vendor. We didn't actually get to work on much directly. Going from the one extreme to another was a HUGE system shock and ultimately why it didn't work out there.
NTG spoiled me in the "you see an issue, fix it" style of work. Granted, if there was something to RMA, etc, we'd reach out to the manufacturer. Or if it was a TWC issue, we'd work with them. But the whole thing about just calling all these different vendors and techs, made me realize how unique NTG is in their "one-stop shop" mentality. Not how most businesses handle things. I don't think most businesses have enough confidence in their techs to do that.
I wonder how much of this came from me because I came from a background of "you never call the vendor." Not that you literally would never call, but you only call when it is their fault (bug in code or whatever.) You never ask them to do the IT job for the IT people - if you do, you aren't the IT person but just a vendor coordinator. I've never worked in a place where it was culturally acceptable to turn to the vendor for IT tasks that are the IT department's responsibility. I've carried that on. You lose a lot of advantages when you do that (delays, lack of cohesive vision, etc.)
It is only since joining some online communities that I even learned that there were vendors that would participate in this and would do IT work or handhold in the way that they do.
Doesn't make sense to me. It seems a lot of companies do that though.
-
@thanksajdotcom This is why it is helpful to be friendly with those higher up than your direct supervisor(s), lol.
-
@dafyre said:
@thanksajdotcom This is why it is helpful to be friendly with those higher up than your direct supervisor(s), lol.
Or you know just everyone in general.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I wonder how much of this came from me because I came from a background of "you never call the vendor." Not that you literally would never call, but you only call when it is their fault (bug in code or whatever.) You never ask them to do the IT job for the IT people - if you do, you aren't the IT person but just a vendor coordinator. I've never worked in a place where it was culturally acceptable to turn to the vendor for IT tasks that are the IT department's responsibility. I've carried that on. You lose a lot of advantages when you do that (delays, lack of cohesive vision, etc.)
It is only since joining some online communities that I even learned that there were vendors that would participate in this and would do IT work or handhold in the way that they do.
It also depends on the problem. I've worked in Student Information systems that were buggy as all get out. Sure, IT can work aroudn the issues with a few SQL Queries and patch the problem until it happens again... But instead, we should call the vendor and see what their recommendations are first. If they say "We'll fix it later"... Then "A patching we will go... "
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
I can't believe how many people let end users manage their own computer just because it is remote.
yeah, that is a bizarre one.
I'm starting to realize that most IT pros are ignorant, and somehow just got into the field. I also think this might be why I have trouble getting some job offers, because they don't want to hire someone smarter than them.. Not that I'm all that smart.
I've struggled at many a job because of that...I don't do well with limiting the scope of my vision. That is one way that NTG was both good and bad for me. At NTG, if it was on the network, we handled it. The job after that, I was a glorified secretary. Have an issue with this product? Call the vendor. That product? Call the vendor? Need something on their phone system tweaked? Schedule a tech from another vendor. We didn't actually get to work on much directly. Going from the one extreme to another was a HUGE system shock and ultimately why it didn't work out there.
NTG spoiled me in the "you see an issue, fix it" style of work. Granted, if there was something to RMA, etc, we'd reach out to the manufacturer. Or if it was a TWC issue, we'd work with them. But the whole thing about just calling all these different vendors and techs, made me realize how unique NTG is in their "one-stop shop" mentality. Not how most businesses handle things. I don't think most businesses have enough confidence in their techs to do that.
I wonder how much of this came from me because I came from a background of "you never call the vendor." Not that you literally would never call, but you only call when it is their fault (bug in code or whatever.) You never ask them to do the IT job for the IT people - if you do, you aren't the IT person but just a vendor coordinator. I've never worked in a place where it was culturally acceptable to turn to the vendor for IT tasks that are the IT department's responsibility. I've carried that on. You lose a lot of advantages when you do that (delays, lack of cohesive vision, etc.)
It is only since joining some online communities that I even learned that there were vendors that would participate in this and would do IT work or handhold in the way that they do.
Doesn't make sense to me. It seems a lot of companies do that though.
I agree, I have no idea where the value comes from, other than an attempt to cover up that IT isn't doing or isn't able to do what they need to do. If I was running and IT department and figured out that my employees weren't working but were just calling vendors and letting them do everything, I'd likely just eliminate them. Anyone can ask a vendor to do work, don't need high pay, skilled IT people for that.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@dafyre said:
@thanksajdotcom This is why it is helpful to be friendly with those higher up than your direct supervisor(s), lol.
Or you know just everyone in general.
Generally, I agree... but there is almost always that one person who just refuses to let you be friendly to them.
-
@dafyre said:
It also depends on the problem. I've worked in Student Information systems that were buggy as all get out. Sure, IT can work aroudn the issues with a few SQL Queries and patch the problem until it happens again... But instead, we should call the vendor and see what their recommendations are first. If they say "We'll fix it later"... Then "A patching we will go... "
People soft? I always say replace the crappy software.
